Characteristics of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Medicine Applicants and Fellowships

Background: Little is known about historical and recent application trends for pulmonary critical care medicine (PCCM) or pulmonary medicine (PM) fellowship programs. Describing trends in and characteristics of PCCM and PM applications, applicants, and fellowship programs can help program directors and medical educators understand trainees’ interest in and application patterns for these fellowship programs. Objective: The objective of this study was to use National Residency Match Program data to assess recent trends in PCCM and PM fellowship applications and compare characteristics of applicants and fellowship programs. Methods: In 2019, we used National Residency Match Program data to evaluate applicant ranking and matching in PCCM and PM fellowship programs and to compare applicant and fellowship program characteristics. Results: From 2008 through 2019, the majority of applicants (59.1%) matched into PCCM were graduates of U.S. allopathic or osteopathic medical schools, whereas 87% of PM fellows were non-U.S. graduates. PCCM was the preferred specialty for 90.8% of matched applicants versus only 31.6% of matched PM applicants (P < 0.001). The match rate for PCCM applicants was 67.2% versus 23.8% for PM applicants (P < 0.001). Of PCCM applicants, 36.6% matched into their top choice versus 10.8% of PM applicants (P < 0.001). There are far fewer PM fellowship positions (n = 23) and programs (n = 12) than PCCM positions (n = 450) and programs (n = 131). The mean fill rates from the 2004 through 2016 appointment years are 94.1% in PCCM and 97.4% in PM (P = 0.009). Conclusion: PCCM is a prevailing specialty choice over PM among residency graduates, with matched applicants more likely to list PCCM than PM as their preferred specialty. Further exploration into applicants’ interest in critical care compared with PM may prove beneficial in guiding applicants to programs that will best meet their career goals.