Cargando…

Can Text Messaging Teach Residents? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Spaced education and the testing effect are both educational methods that increase long-term memory formation; however, these can be difficult to implement during residency training given time constraints. Text messaging is ubiquitous but has not been studied as a spaced education tool....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Artinian, Hovig K., Keens, Thomas G., Kato, Roberta, Chang, Todd P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870294
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0025OC
_version_ 1783678280862269440
author Artinian, Hovig K.
Keens, Thomas G.
Kato, Roberta
Chang, Todd P.
author_facet Artinian, Hovig K.
Keens, Thomas G.
Kato, Roberta
Chang, Todd P.
author_sort Artinian, Hovig K.
collection PubMed
description Background: Spaced education and the testing effect are both educational methods that increase long-term memory formation; however, these can be difficult to implement during residency training given time constraints. Text messaging is ubiquitous but has not been studied as a spaced education tool. Objective: Assess if text messaging improves resident knowledge during an inpatient pediatric pulmonary rotation. Methods: A prospective randomized control study with pediatric residents on a pulmonary inpatient rotation was conducted at an urban free-standing children’s hospital between 2016 and 2017. The intervention arm received one daily multiple-choice text message scenario and a scripted teaching text for each response. Both arms received standard pulmonary education. Knowledge was assessed using a 23-item pretest and posttest with unique, nonrepeated items with fair reliability, following iterative revisions. Perceived value of texting was assessed using Likert scales. Paired and unpaired t tests compared knowledge and value scores. The difference between pretest and posttest scores (delta) for both arms was calculated, then compared using an unpaired t test. Spearman’s rho evaluated maturation bias. Analysis of variance evaluated year of training as a confounding factor. Results: A total of 65 residents were randomized, with a response rate of 81%. Posttest mean scores were lower than pretest in both arms, attributed to more difficult questions randomized to the posttest. The intervention arm scored higher on the posttest (P = 0.04). However, the delta mean did not show a statistically significant difference (P = 0.6). Text messaging was viewed as “effective” by 80% of participants in the intervention arm. Conclusion: A scripted text messaging intervention is perceived as effective by learners but did not result in measurable increased resident knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8043317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80433172021-04-16 Can Text Messaging Teach Residents? A Randomized Controlled Trial Artinian, Hovig K. Keens, Thomas G. Kato, Roberta Chang, Todd P. ATS Sch Original Research Background: Spaced education and the testing effect are both educational methods that increase long-term memory formation; however, these can be difficult to implement during residency training given time constraints. Text messaging is ubiquitous but has not been studied as a spaced education tool. Objective: Assess if text messaging improves resident knowledge during an inpatient pediatric pulmonary rotation. Methods: A prospective randomized control study with pediatric residents on a pulmonary inpatient rotation was conducted at an urban free-standing children’s hospital between 2016 and 2017. The intervention arm received one daily multiple-choice text message scenario and a scripted teaching text for each response. Both arms received standard pulmonary education. Knowledge was assessed using a 23-item pretest and posttest with unique, nonrepeated items with fair reliability, following iterative revisions. Perceived value of texting was assessed using Likert scales. Paired and unpaired t tests compared knowledge and value scores. The difference between pretest and posttest scores (delta) for both arms was calculated, then compared using an unpaired t test. Spearman’s rho evaluated maturation bias. Analysis of variance evaluated year of training as a confounding factor. Results: A total of 65 residents were randomized, with a response rate of 81%. Posttest mean scores were lower than pretest in both arms, attributed to more difficult questions randomized to the posttest. The intervention arm scored higher on the posttest (P = 0.04). However, the delta mean did not show a statistically significant difference (P = 0.6). Text messaging was viewed as “effective” by 80% of participants in the intervention arm. Conclusion: A scripted text messaging intervention is perceived as effective by learners but did not result in measurable increased resident knowledge. American Thoracic Society 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8043317/ /pubmed/33870294 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0025OC Text en Copyright © 2020 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). For commercial usage and reprints, please contact Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org).
spellingShingle Original Research
Artinian, Hovig K.
Keens, Thomas G.
Kato, Roberta
Chang, Todd P.
Can Text Messaging Teach Residents? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Can Text Messaging Teach Residents? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Can Text Messaging Teach Residents? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Can Text Messaging Teach Residents? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Can Text Messaging Teach Residents? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Can Text Messaging Teach Residents? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort can text messaging teach residents? a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870294
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0025OC
work_keys_str_mv AT artinianhovigk cantextmessagingteachresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT keensthomasg cantextmessagingteachresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT katoroberta cantextmessagingteachresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT changtoddp cantextmessagingteachresidentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial