Cargando…

Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The intraperitoneal route of administration accounts for less than 1% of insulin treatment regimes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1). Despite being used for decades, a systematic review of various physiological effects of this route of insulin administration is lacking. Thus, the aim o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dirnena-Fusini, Ilze, Åm, Marte Kierulf, Fougner, Anders Lyngvi, Carlsen, Sven Magnus, Christiansen, Sverre Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33848314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249611
_version_ 1783678291490635776
author Dirnena-Fusini, Ilze
Åm, Marte Kierulf
Fougner, Anders Lyngvi
Carlsen, Sven Magnus
Christiansen, Sverre Christian
author_facet Dirnena-Fusini, Ilze
Åm, Marte Kierulf
Fougner, Anders Lyngvi
Carlsen, Sven Magnus
Christiansen, Sverre Christian
author_sort Dirnena-Fusini, Ilze
collection PubMed
description The intraperitoneal route of administration accounts for less than 1% of insulin treatment regimes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1). Despite being used for decades, a systematic review of various physiological effects of this route of insulin administration is lacking. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to identify the physiological effects of continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) compared to those of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in patients with DM1. Four databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL) were searched beginning from the inception date of each database to 10(th) of July 2020, using search terms related to intraperitoneal and subcutaneous insulin administration. Only studies comparing CIPII treatment (≥ 1 month) with CSII treatment were included. Primary outcomes were long-term glycaemic control (after ≥ 3 months of CIPII inferred from glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels) and short-term (≥ 1 day for each intervention) measurements of insulin dynamics in the systematic circulation. Secondary outcomes included all reported parameters other than the primary outcomes. The search identified a total of 2242 records; 39 reports from 32 studies met the eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis focused on the most relevant clinical end points; the mean difference (MD) in HbA1c levels during CIPII was significantly lower than during CSII (MD = -6.7 mmol/mol, [95% CI: -10.3 –-3.1]; in percentage: MD = -0.61%, [95% CI: -0.94 –- 0.28], p = 0.0002), whereas fasting blood glucose levels were similar (MD = 0.20 mmol/L, [95% CI: -0.34–0.74], p = 0.47; in mg/dL: MD = 3.6 mg/dL, [95% CI: -6.1–13.3], p = 0.47). The frequencies of severe hypo- and hyper-glycaemia were reduced. The fasting insulin levels were significantly lower during CIPII than during CSII (MD = 16.70 pmol/L, [95% CI: -23.62 –-9.77], p < 0.0001). Compared to CSII treatment, CIPII treatment improved overall glucose control and reduced fasting insulin levels in patients with DM1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8043377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80433772021-04-20 Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis Dirnena-Fusini, Ilze Åm, Marte Kierulf Fougner, Anders Lyngvi Carlsen, Sven Magnus Christiansen, Sverre Christian PLoS One Research Article The intraperitoneal route of administration accounts for less than 1% of insulin treatment regimes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1). Despite being used for decades, a systematic review of various physiological effects of this route of insulin administration is lacking. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to identify the physiological effects of continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) compared to those of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in patients with DM1. Four databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL) were searched beginning from the inception date of each database to 10(th) of July 2020, using search terms related to intraperitoneal and subcutaneous insulin administration. Only studies comparing CIPII treatment (≥ 1 month) with CSII treatment were included. Primary outcomes were long-term glycaemic control (after ≥ 3 months of CIPII inferred from glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels) and short-term (≥ 1 day for each intervention) measurements of insulin dynamics in the systematic circulation. Secondary outcomes included all reported parameters other than the primary outcomes. The search identified a total of 2242 records; 39 reports from 32 studies met the eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis focused on the most relevant clinical end points; the mean difference (MD) in HbA1c levels during CIPII was significantly lower than during CSII (MD = -6.7 mmol/mol, [95% CI: -10.3 –-3.1]; in percentage: MD = -0.61%, [95% CI: -0.94 –- 0.28], p = 0.0002), whereas fasting blood glucose levels were similar (MD = 0.20 mmol/L, [95% CI: -0.34–0.74], p = 0.47; in mg/dL: MD = 3.6 mg/dL, [95% CI: -6.1–13.3], p = 0.47). The frequencies of severe hypo- and hyper-glycaemia were reduced. The fasting insulin levels were significantly lower during CIPII than during CSII (MD = 16.70 pmol/L, [95% CI: -23.62 –-9.77], p < 0.0001). Compared to CSII treatment, CIPII treatment improved overall glucose control and reduced fasting insulin levels in patients with DM1. Public Library of Science 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8043377/ /pubmed/33848314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249611 Text en © 2021 Dirnena-Fusini et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dirnena-Fusini, Ilze
Åm, Marte Kierulf
Fougner, Anders Lyngvi
Carlsen, Sven Magnus
Christiansen, Sverre Christian
Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33848314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249611
work_keys_str_mv AT dirnenafusiniilze physiologicaleffectsofintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulininfusioninpatientswithdiabetesmellitustype1asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ammartekierulf physiologicaleffectsofintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulininfusioninpatientswithdiabetesmellitustype1asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fougneranderslyngvi physiologicaleffectsofintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulininfusioninpatientswithdiabetesmellitustype1asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carlsensvenmagnus physiologicaleffectsofintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulininfusioninpatientswithdiabetesmellitustype1asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT christiansensverrechristian physiologicaleffectsofintraperitonealversussubcutaneousinsulininfusioninpatientswithdiabetesmellitustype1asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis