Cargando…
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: In recent years, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been applied to different psychiatric conditions beyond post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and an increasing number of studies have evaluated its effect on depression. To date, no quantitative synthesis of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1894736 |
_version_ | 1783678322591399936 |
---|---|
author | Carletto, Sara Malandrone, Francesca Berchialla, Paola Oliva, Francesco Colombi, Nicoletta Hase, Michael Hofmann, Arne Ostacoli, Luca |
author_facet | Carletto, Sara Malandrone, Francesca Berchialla, Paola Oliva, Francesco Colombi, Nicoletta Hase, Michael Hofmann, Arne Ostacoli, Luca |
author_sort | Carletto, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In recent years, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been applied to different psychiatric conditions beyond post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and an increasing number of studies have evaluated its effect on depression. To date, no quantitative synthesis of the efficacy of EMDR on depression has been conducted. Objective: To meta-analytically review the studies on EMDR for depression as the primary target for treatment. Method: Studies with a controlled design evaluating the effect of EMDR on depression were searched on six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane database, and Francine Shapiro Library) and then selected by two independent reviewers. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Eleven studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 373 participants. The overall effect size of EMDR for depressive symptoms is large (n = 9, Hedges’ g = – 1.07; 95%CI [–1.66; – 0.48]), with high heterogeneity (I(2) = 84%), and corresponds to a ‘number needed to treat’ of 1.8. At follow-up (range 3–6 months), the effect remains significant but moderate (n = 3, Hedges’ g = – 0.62; 95%CI [–0.97; – 0.28]; I(2) = 0%). The effect of EMDR compared with active controls is also moderate (n = 7, g = – 0.68; 95%CI [–0.92; – 0.43]; I(2) = 0%). No publication bias was found, although the results are limited by the small number and poor methodological quality of the included studies. Conclusions: Review findings suggest that EMDR may be considered an effective treatment for improving symptoms of depression, with effects comparable to other active treatments. However, findings need to be interpreted in light of the limited number of the studies and their quality. Further research is required to understand the longer-term of effects EMDR in treating depression and preventing depression relapse. Protocol registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018090086). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8043524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80435242021-04-21 Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Carletto, Sara Malandrone, Francesca Berchialla, Paola Oliva, Francesco Colombi, Nicoletta Hase, Michael Hofmann, Arne Ostacoli, Luca Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article Background: In recent years, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been applied to different psychiatric conditions beyond post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and an increasing number of studies have evaluated its effect on depression. To date, no quantitative synthesis of the efficacy of EMDR on depression has been conducted. Objective: To meta-analytically review the studies on EMDR for depression as the primary target for treatment. Method: Studies with a controlled design evaluating the effect of EMDR on depression were searched on six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane database, and Francine Shapiro Library) and then selected by two independent reviewers. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Eleven studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 373 participants. The overall effect size of EMDR for depressive symptoms is large (n = 9, Hedges’ g = – 1.07; 95%CI [–1.66; – 0.48]), with high heterogeneity (I(2) = 84%), and corresponds to a ‘number needed to treat’ of 1.8. At follow-up (range 3–6 months), the effect remains significant but moderate (n = 3, Hedges’ g = – 0.62; 95%CI [–0.97; – 0.28]; I(2) = 0%). The effect of EMDR compared with active controls is also moderate (n = 7, g = – 0.68; 95%CI [–0.92; – 0.43]; I(2) = 0%). No publication bias was found, although the results are limited by the small number and poor methodological quality of the included studies. Conclusions: Review findings suggest that EMDR may be considered an effective treatment for improving symptoms of depression, with effects comparable to other active treatments. However, findings need to be interpreted in light of the limited number of the studies and their quality. Further research is required to understand the longer-term of effects EMDR in treating depression and preventing depression relapse. Protocol registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018090086). Taylor & Francis 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8043524/ /pubmed/33889310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1894736 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Carletto, Sara Malandrone, Francesca Berchialla, Paola Oliva, Francesco Colombi, Nicoletta Hase, Michael Hofmann, Arne Ostacoli, Luca Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1894736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlettosara eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malandronefrancesca eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT berchiallapaola eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT olivafrancesco eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT colombinicoletta eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hasemichael eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hofmannarne eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ostacoliluca eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |