Cargando…

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: In recent years, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been applied to different psychiatric conditions beyond post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and an increasing number of studies have evaluated its effect on depression. To date, no quantitative synthesis of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carletto, Sara, Malandrone, Francesca, Berchialla, Paola, Oliva, Francesco, Colombi, Nicoletta, Hase, Michael, Hofmann, Arne, Ostacoli, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1894736
_version_ 1783678322591399936
author Carletto, Sara
Malandrone, Francesca
Berchialla, Paola
Oliva, Francesco
Colombi, Nicoletta
Hase, Michael
Hofmann, Arne
Ostacoli, Luca
author_facet Carletto, Sara
Malandrone, Francesca
Berchialla, Paola
Oliva, Francesco
Colombi, Nicoletta
Hase, Michael
Hofmann, Arne
Ostacoli, Luca
author_sort Carletto, Sara
collection PubMed
description Background: In recent years, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been applied to different psychiatric conditions beyond post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and an increasing number of studies have evaluated its effect on depression. To date, no quantitative synthesis of the efficacy of EMDR on depression has been conducted. Objective: To meta-analytically review the studies on EMDR for depression as the primary target for treatment. Method: Studies with a controlled design evaluating the effect of EMDR on depression were searched on six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane database, and Francine Shapiro Library) and then selected by two independent reviewers. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Eleven studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 373 participants. The overall effect size of EMDR for depressive symptoms is large (n = 9, Hedges’ g = – 1.07; 95%CI [–1.66; – 0.48]), with high heterogeneity (I(2) = 84%), and corresponds to a ‘number needed to treat’ of 1.8. At follow-up (range 3–6 months), the effect remains significant but moderate (n = 3, Hedges’ g = – 0.62; 95%CI [–0.97; – 0.28]; I(2) = 0%). The effect of EMDR compared with active controls is also moderate (n = 7, g = – 0.68; 95%CI [–0.92; – 0.43]; I(2) = 0%). No publication bias was found, although the results are limited by the small number and poor methodological quality of the included studies. Conclusions: Review findings suggest that EMDR may be considered an effective treatment for improving symptoms of depression, with effects comparable to other active treatments. However, findings need to be interpreted in light of the limited number of the studies and their quality. Further research is required to understand the longer-term of effects EMDR in treating depression and preventing depression relapse. Protocol registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018090086).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8043524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80435242021-04-21 Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Carletto, Sara Malandrone, Francesca Berchialla, Paola Oliva, Francesco Colombi, Nicoletta Hase, Michael Hofmann, Arne Ostacoli, Luca Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article Background: In recent years, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) has been applied to different psychiatric conditions beyond post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and an increasing number of studies have evaluated its effect on depression. To date, no quantitative synthesis of the efficacy of EMDR on depression has been conducted. Objective: To meta-analytically review the studies on EMDR for depression as the primary target for treatment. Method: Studies with a controlled design evaluating the effect of EMDR on depression were searched on six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane database, and Francine Shapiro Library) and then selected by two independent reviewers. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Eleven studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 373 participants. The overall effect size of EMDR for depressive symptoms is large (n = 9, Hedges’ g = – 1.07; 95%CI [–1.66; – 0.48]), with high heterogeneity (I(2) = 84%), and corresponds to a ‘number needed to treat’ of 1.8. At follow-up (range 3–6 months), the effect remains significant but moderate (n = 3, Hedges’ g = – 0.62; 95%CI [–0.97; – 0.28]; I(2) = 0%). The effect of EMDR compared with active controls is also moderate (n = 7, g = – 0.68; 95%CI [–0.92; – 0.43]; I(2) = 0%). No publication bias was found, although the results are limited by the small number and poor methodological quality of the included studies. Conclusions: Review findings suggest that EMDR may be considered an effective treatment for improving symptoms of depression, with effects comparable to other active treatments. However, findings need to be interpreted in light of the limited number of the studies and their quality. Further research is required to understand the longer-term of effects EMDR in treating depression and preventing depression relapse. Protocol registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018090086). Taylor & Francis 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8043524/ /pubmed/33889310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1894736 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Carletto, Sara
Malandrone, Francesca
Berchialla, Paola
Oliva, Francesco
Colombi, Nicoletta
Hase, Michael
Hofmann, Arne
Ostacoli, Luca
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1894736
work_keys_str_mv AT carlettosara eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malandronefrancesca eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT berchiallapaola eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT olivafrancesco eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT colombinicoletta eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hasemichael eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hofmannarne eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ostacoliluca eyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessingfordepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis