Cargando…

Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna

The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradshaw, Corey JA, Johnson, Christopher N, Llewelyn, John, Weisbecker, Vera, Strona, Giovanni, Saltré, Frédérik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33783356
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63870
_version_ 1783678359278977024
author Bradshaw, Corey JA
Johnson, Christopher N
Llewelyn, John
Weisbecker, Vera
Strona, Giovanni
Saltré, Frédérik
author_facet Bradshaw, Corey JA
Johnson, Christopher N
Llewelyn, John
Weisbecker, Vera
Strona, Giovanni
Saltré, Frédérik
author_sort Bradshaw, Corey JA
collection PubMed
description The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured models for 13 extinct megafauna species from five functional/taxonomic groups, as well as 8 extant species within these groups for comparison. Perturbing specific demographic rates individually, we tested which species were more demographically susceptible to extinction, and then compared these relative sensitivities to the fossil-derived extinction chronology. Our models show that the macropodiformes were the least demographically susceptible to extinction, followed by carnivores, monotremes, vombatiform herbivores, and large birds. Five of the eight extant species were as or more susceptible than the extinct species. There was no clear relationship between extinction susceptibility and the extinction chronology for any perturbation scenario, while body mass and generation length explained much of the variation in relative risk. Our results reveal that the actual mechanisms leading to the observed extinction chronology were unlikely related to variation in demographic susceptibility per se, but were possibly driven instead by finer-scale variation in climate change and/or human prey choice and relative hunting success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8043753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80437532021-04-21 Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna Bradshaw, Corey JA Johnson, Christopher N Llewelyn, John Weisbecker, Vera Strona, Giovanni Saltré, Frédérik eLife Ecology The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured models for 13 extinct megafauna species from five functional/taxonomic groups, as well as 8 extant species within these groups for comparison. Perturbing specific demographic rates individually, we tested which species were more demographically susceptible to extinction, and then compared these relative sensitivities to the fossil-derived extinction chronology. Our models show that the macropodiformes were the least demographically susceptible to extinction, followed by carnivores, monotremes, vombatiform herbivores, and large birds. Five of the eight extant species were as or more susceptible than the extinct species. There was no clear relationship between extinction susceptibility and the extinction chronology for any perturbation scenario, while body mass and generation length explained much of the variation in relative risk. Our results reveal that the actual mechanisms leading to the observed extinction chronology were unlikely related to variation in demographic susceptibility per se, but were possibly driven instead by finer-scale variation in climate change and/or human prey choice and relative hunting success. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8043753/ /pubmed/33783356 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63870 Text en © 2021, Bradshaw et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Bradshaw, Corey JA
Johnson, Christopher N
Llewelyn, John
Weisbecker, Vera
Strona, Giovanni
Saltré, Frédérik
Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna
title Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna
title_full Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna
title_fullStr Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna
title_full_unstemmed Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna
title_short Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna
title_sort relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of sahul’s megafauna
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33783356
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63870
work_keys_str_mv AT bradshawcoreyja relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna
AT johnsonchristophern relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna
AT llewelynjohn relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna
AT weisbeckervera relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna
AT stronagiovanni relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna
AT saltrefrederik relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna