Cargando…
Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna
The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured model...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33783356 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63870 |
_version_ | 1783678359278977024 |
---|---|
author | Bradshaw, Corey JA Johnson, Christopher N Llewelyn, John Weisbecker, Vera Strona, Giovanni Saltré, Frédérik |
author_facet | Bradshaw, Corey JA Johnson, Christopher N Llewelyn, John Weisbecker, Vera Strona, Giovanni Saltré, Frédérik |
author_sort | Bradshaw, Corey JA |
collection | PubMed |
description | The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured models for 13 extinct megafauna species from five functional/taxonomic groups, as well as 8 extant species within these groups for comparison. Perturbing specific demographic rates individually, we tested which species were more demographically susceptible to extinction, and then compared these relative sensitivities to the fossil-derived extinction chronology. Our models show that the macropodiformes were the least demographically susceptible to extinction, followed by carnivores, monotremes, vombatiform herbivores, and large birds. Five of the eight extant species were as or more susceptible than the extinct species. There was no clear relationship between extinction susceptibility and the extinction chronology for any perturbation scenario, while body mass and generation length explained much of the variation in relative risk. Our results reveal that the actual mechanisms leading to the observed extinction chronology were unlikely related to variation in demographic susceptibility per se, but were possibly driven instead by finer-scale variation in climate change and/or human prey choice and relative hunting success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8043753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80437532021-04-21 Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna Bradshaw, Corey JA Johnson, Christopher N Llewelyn, John Weisbecker, Vera Strona, Giovanni Saltré, Frédérik eLife Ecology The causes of Sahul’s megafauna extinctions remain uncertain, although several interacting factors were likely responsible. To examine the relative support for hypotheses regarding plausible ecological mechanisms underlying these extinctions, we constructed the first stochastic, age-structured models for 13 extinct megafauna species from five functional/taxonomic groups, as well as 8 extant species within these groups for comparison. Perturbing specific demographic rates individually, we tested which species were more demographically susceptible to extinction, and then compared these relative sensitivities to the fossil-derived extinction chronology. Our models show that the macropodiformes were the least demographically susceptible to extinction, followed by carnivores, monotremes, vombatiform herbivores, and large birds. Five of the eight extant species were as or more susceptible than the extinct species. There was no clear relationship between extinction susceptibility and the extinction chronology for any perturbation scenario, while body mass and generation length explained much of the variation in relative risk. Our results reveal that the actual mechanisms leading to the observed extinction chronology were unlikely related to variation in demographic susceptibility per se, but were possibly driven instead by finer-scale variation in climate change and/or human prey choice and relative hunting success. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8043753/ /pubmed/33783356 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63870 Text en © 2021, Bradshaw et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Ecology Bradshaw, Corey JA Johnson, Christopher N Llewelyn, John Weisbecker, Vera Strona, Giovanni Saltré, Frédérik Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna |
title | Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna |
title_full | Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna |
title_fullStr | Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna |
title_short | Relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of Sahul’s megafauna |
title_sort | relative demographic susceptibility does not explain the extinction chronology of sahul’s megafauna |
topic | Ecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33783356 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bradshawcoreyja relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna AT johnsonchristophern relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna AT llewelynjohn relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna AT weisbeckervera relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna AT stronagiovanni relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna AT saltrefrederik relativedemographicsusceptibilitydoesnotexplaintheextinctionchronologyofsahulsmegafauna |