Cargando…
Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to methicillin in methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is due to the presence of mec-A gene, which encodes a low affinity penicillin binding protein (PBP)-2a or PBP2. Accurate and rapid identification of MRSA in clinical specimens is ess...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889360 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v13i1.5489 |
_version_ | 1783678374211747840 |
---|---|
author | Madhavan, Anitha Sachu, Arun Balakrishnan, Anukumar Vasudevan, Anu Balakrishnan, Sobha Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi |
author_facet | Madhavan, Anitha Sachu, Arun Balakrishnan, Anukumar Vasudevan, Anu Balakrishnan, Sobha Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi |
author_sort | Madhavan, Anitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to methicillin in methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is due to the presence of mec-A gene, which encodes a low affinity penicillin binding protein (PBP)-2a or PBP2. Accurate and rapid identification of MRSA in clinical specimens is essential for timely decision on effective treatment. The aim of the study was to compare three different methods for detection of MRSA namely cefoxitin disc diffusion, CHROM agar MRSA and VITEK-2 susceptibility with PCR which is the gold standard reference method and to find the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of these isolates by VITEK-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Total of 100 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were collected from different clinical samples among both outpatient and inpatients. Detection of MRSA among these isolates was done by cefoxitin disc diffusion, VITEK-2, CHROM agar MRSA and PCR. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of cefoxitin disc diffusion and Vitek was found to be 97.2% and 100%, while that of CHROM agar was found to be 100% and 78.6%. The overall prevalence of MRSA in our study by PCR was 72%. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings in our study, isolates which show cefoxitin zone diameter < 22 mm can be reported as MRSA. However, those isolates which have a zone diameter between 22–24 mm, should ideally be confirmed by PCR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8043827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80438272021-04-21 Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus Madhavan, Anitha Sachu, Arun Balakrishnan, Anukumar Vasudevan, Anu Balakrishnan, Sobha Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi Iran J Microbiol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to methicillin in methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is due to the presence of mec-A gene, which encodes a low affinity penicillin binding protein (PBP)-2a or PBP2. Accurate and rapid identification of MRSA in clinical specimens is essential for timely decision on effective treatment. The aim of the study was to compare three different methods for detection of MRSA namely cefoxitin disc diffusion, CHROM agar MRSA and VITEK-2 susceptibility with PCR which is the gold standard reference method and to find the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of these isolates by VITEK-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Total of 100 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were collected from different clinical samples among both outpatient and inpatients. Detection of MRSA among these isolates was done by cefoxitin disc diffusion, VITEK-2, CHROM agar MRSA and PCR. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of cefoxitin disc diffusion and Vitek was found to be 97.2% and 100%, while that of CHROM agar was found to be 100% and 78.6%. The overall prevalence of MRSA in our study by PCR was 72%. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings in our study, isolates which show cefoxitin zone diameter < 22 mm can be reported as MRSA. However, those isolates which have a zone diameter between 22–24 mm, should ideally be confirmed by PCR. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8043827/ /pubmed/33889360 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v13i1.5489 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Madhavan, Anitha Sachu, Arun Balakrishnan, Anukumar Vasudevan, Anu Balakrishnan, Sobha Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title | Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_full | Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_fullStr | Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_short | Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
title_sort | comparison of pcr and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889360 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v13i1.5489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madhavananitha comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT sachuarun comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT balakrishnananukumar comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT vasudevananu comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT balakrishnansobha comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT vasudevapanickerjayalakshmi comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus |