Cargando…

Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to methicillin in methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is due to the presence of mec-A gene, which encodes a low affinity penicillin binding protein (PBP)-2a or PBP2. Accurate and rapid identification of MRSA in clinical specimens is ess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madhavan, Anitha, Sachu, Arun, Balakrishnan, Anukumar, Vasudevan, Anu, Balakrishnan, Sobha, Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889360
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v13i1.5489
_version_ 1783678374211747840
author Madhavan, Anitha
Sachu, Arun
Balakrishnan, Anukumar
Vasudevan, Anu
Balakrishnan, Sobha
Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi
author_facet Madhavan, Anitha
Sachu, Arun
Balakrishnan, Anukumar
Vasudevan, Anu
Balakrishnan, Sobha
Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi
author_sort Madhavan, Anitha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to methicillin in methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is due to the presence of mec-A gene, which encodes a low affinity penicillin binding protein (PBP)-2a or PBP2. Accurate and rapid identification of MRSA in clinical specimens is essential for timely decision on effective treatment. The aim of the study was to compare three different methods for detection of MRSA namely cefoxitin disc diffusion, CHROM agar MRSA and VITEK-2 susceptibility with PCR which is the gold standard reference method and to find the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of these isolates by VITEK-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Total of 100 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were collected from different clinical samples among both outpatient and inpatients. Detection of MRSA among these isolates was done by cefoxitin disc diffusion, VITEK-2, CHROM agar MRSA and PCR. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of cefoxitin disc diffusion and Vitek was found to be 97.2% and 100%, while that of CHROM agar was found to be 100% and 78.6%. The overall prevalence of MRSA in our study by PCR was 72%. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings in our study, isolates which show cefoxitin zone diameter < 22 mm can be reported as MRSA. However, those isolates which have a zone diameter between 22–24 mm, should ideally be confirmed by PCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8043827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80438272021-04-21 Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus Madhavan, Anitha Sachu, Arun Balakrishnan, Anukumar Vasudevan, Anu Balakrishnan, Sobha Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi Iran J Microbiol Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resistance to methicillin in methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is due to the presence of mec-A gene, which encodes a low affinity penicillin binding protein (PBP)-2a or PBP2. Accurate and rapid identification of MRSA in clinical specimens is essential for timely decision on effective treatment. The aim of the study was to compare three different methods for detection of MRSA namely cefoxitin disc diffusion, CHROM agar MRSA and VITEK-2 susceptibility with PCR which is the gold standard reference method and to find the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of these isolates by VITEK-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Total of 100 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were collected from different clinical samples among both outpatient and inpatients. Detection of MRSA among these isolates was done by cefoxitin disc diffusion, VITEK-2, CHROM agar MRSA and PCR. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of cefoxitin disc diffusion and Vitek was found to be 97.2% and 100%, while that of CHROM agar was found to be 100% and 78.6%. The overall prevalence of MRSA in our study by PCR was 72%. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings in our study, isolates which show cefoxitin zone diameter < 22 mm can be reported as MRSA. However, those isolates which have a zone diameter between 22–24 mm, should ideally be confirmed by PCR. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8043827/ /pubmed/33889360 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v13i1.5489 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Madhavan, Anitha
Sachu, Arun
Balakrishnan, Anukumar
Vasudevan, Anu
Balakrishnan, Sobha
Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi
Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_full Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_short Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort comparison of pcr and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889360
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v13i1.5489
work_keys_str_mv AT madhavananitha comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT sachuarun comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT balakrishnananukumar comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT vasudevananu comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT balakrishnansobha comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT vasudevapanickerjayalakshmi comparisonofpcrandphenotypicmethodsforthedetectionofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus