Cargando…
Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study)
OBJECTIVES: MRI remains the preferred imaging investigation for glioblastoma. Appropriate and timely neuroimaging in the follow-up period is considered to be important in making management decisions. There is a paucity of evidence-based information in current UK, European and international guideline...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07387-3 |
_version_ | 1783678381284392960 |
---|---|
author | Booth, Thomas C. Luis, Aysha Brazil, Lucy Thompson, Gerry Daniel, Rachel A. Shuaib, Haris Ashkan, Keyoumars Pandey, Anmol |
author_facet | Booth, Thomas C. Luis, Aysha Brazil, Lucy Thompson, Gerry Daniel, Rachel A. Shuaib, Haris Ashkan, Keyoumars Pandey, Anmol |
author_sort | Booth, Thomas C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: MRI remains the preferred imaging investigation for glioblastoma. Appropriate and timely neuroimaging in the follow-up period is considered to be important in making management decisions. There is a paucity of evidence-based information in current UK, European and international guidelines regarding the optimal timing and type of neuroimaging following initial neurosurgical treatment. This study assessed the current imaging practices amongst UK neuro-oncology centres, thus providing baseline data and informing future practice. METHODS: The lead neuro-oncologist, neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon from every UK neuro-oncology centre were invited to complete an online survey. Participants were asked about current and ideal imaging practices following initial treatment. RESULTS: Ninety-two participants from all 31 neuro-oncology centres completed the survey (100% response rate). Most centres routinely performed an early post-operative MRI (87%, 27/31), whereas only a third performed a pre-radiotherapy MRI (32%, 10/31). The number and timing of scans routinely performed during adjuvant TMZ treatment varied widely between centres. At the end of the adjuvant period, most centres performed an MRI (71%, 22/31), followed by monitoring scans at 3 monthly intervals (81%, 25/31). Additional short-interval imaging was carried out in cases of possible pseudoprogression in most centres (71%, 22/31). Routine use of advanced imaging was infrequent; however, the addition of advanced sequences was the most popular suggestion for ideal imaging practice, followed by changes in the timing of EPMRI. CONCLUSION: Variations in neuroimaging practices exist after initial glioblastoma treatment within the UK. Multicentre, longitudinal, prospective trials are needed to define the optimal imaging schedule for assessment. KEY POINTS: • Variations in imaging practices exist in the frequency, timing and type of interval neuroimaging after initial treatment of glioblastoma within the UK. • Large, multicentre, longitudinal, prospective trials are needed to define the optimal imaging schedule for assessment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07387-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8043861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80438612021-04-27 Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study) Booth, Thomas C. Luis, Aysha Brazil, Lucy Thompson, Gerry Daniel, Rachel A. Shuaib, Haris Ashkan, Keyoumars Pandey, Anmol Eur Radiol Neuro OBJECTIVES: MRI remains the preferred imaging investigation for glioblastoma. Appropriate and timely neuroimaging in the follow-up period is considered to be important in making management decisions. There is a paucity of evidence-based information in current UK, European and international guidelines regarding the optimal timing and type of neuroimaging following initial neurosurgical treatment. This study assessed the current imaging practices amongst UK neuro-oncology centres, thus providing baseline data and informing future practice. METHODS: The lead neuro-oncologist, neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon from every UK neuro-oncology centre were invited to complete an online survey. Participants were asked about current and ideal imaging practices following initial treatment. RESULTS: Ninety-two participants from all 31 neuro-oncology centres completed the survey (100% response rate). Most centres routinely performed an early post-operative MRI (87%, 27/31), whereas only a third performed a pre-radiotherapy MRI (32%, 10/31). The number and timing of scans routinely performed during adjuvant TMZ treatment varied widely between centres. At the end of the adjuvant period, most centres performed an MRI (71%, 22/31), followed by monitoring scans at 3 monthly intervals (81%, 25/31). Additional short-interval imaging was carried out in cases of possible pseudoprogression in most centres (71%, 22/31). Routine use of advanced imaging was infrequent; however, the addition of advanced sequences was the most popular suggestion for ideal imaging practice, followed by changes in the timing of EPMRI. CONCLUSION: Variations in neuroimaging practices exist after initial glioblastoma treatment within the UK. Multicentre, longitudinal, prospective trials are needed to define the optimal imaging schedule for assessment. KEY POINTS: • Variations in imaging practices exist in the frequency, timing and type of interval neuroimaging after initial treatment of glioblastoma within the UK. • Large, multicentre, longitudinal, prospective trials are needed to define the optimal imaging schedule for assessment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07387-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8043861/ /pubmed/33151394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07387-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Neuro Booth, Thomas C. Luis, Aysha Brazil, Lucy Thompson, Gerry Daniel, Rachel A. Shuaib, Haris Ashkan, Keyoumars Pandey, Anmol Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study) |
title | Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study) |
title_full | Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study) |
title_fullStr | Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study) |
title_short | Glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current UK practice (GIN CUP study) |
title_sort | glioblastoma post-operative imaging in neuro-oncology: current uk practice (gin cup study) |
topic | Neuro |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07387-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT booththomasc glioblastomapostoperativeimaginginneurooncologycurrentukpracticegincupstudy AT luisaysha glioblastomapostoperativeimaginginneurooncologycurrentukpracticegincupstudy AT brazillucy glioblastomapostoperativeimaginginneurooncologycurrentukpracticegincupstudy AT thompsongerry glioblastomapostoperativeimaginginneurooncologycurrentukpracticegincupstudy AT danielrachela glioblastomapostoperativeimaginginneurooncologycurrentukpracticegincupstudy AT shuaibharis glioblastomapostoperativeimaginginneurooncologycurrentukpracticegincupstudy AT ashkankeyoumars glioblastomapostoperativeimaginginneurooncologycurrentukpracticegincupstudy AT pandeyanmol glioblastomapostoperativeimaginginneurooncologycurrentukpracticegincupstudy |