Cargando…

Implementation of a Rapid Post-Code Debrief Quality Improvement Project in a Community Emergency Department Setting

CONTEXT: Regular debriefing has been associated with improved resource utilization and measurable improvements in team performance in crisis situations. While Emergency Department (ED) staff have often stated that they would like to be provided a formal debriefing model after “code blue” and similar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Przednowek, Tomasz, Stacey, Camille, Baird, Katherine, Nolan, Robert, Kellar, Jesse, Corser, William D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33870002
http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.21376
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Regular debriefing has been associated with improved resource utilization and measurable improvements in team performance in crisis situations. While Emergency Department (ED) staff have often stated that they would like to be provided a formal debriefing model after “code blue” and similar events, few EDs have such protocols in place. METHODS: The study consisted of two data collection processes: (1) completion of a 7-item survey distributed pre-intervention, 6-months post-intervention, and 1-year post-intervention, and (2) completion of a Rapid Post-Code Debriefing form. Overall responses were measured on a possible 0-10 scale and individual responses were tracked. The debrief process was triggered by one of four criteria and followed a standard format using a readily available form. RESULTS: A total of 178 pre- and post-debriefing protocol implementation survey responses were collected throughout the duration of the study. Of those, 79 (44.4%) were pre-protocol response surveys. The post-protocol responses were comprised of 51 (51.5%) six month and 48 (48.5%) 12-month surveys. The average overall satisfaction with code-response performance increased significantly following the implementation of the debriefing protocol, from M=6.661, SD=2.028 to M=7.90, SD=1.359 (independent t-test = 5.069, p<0.001). There was a statistically significant decrease regarding how respondents felt emotionally supported after a code by their staff, (Pearson Chi Square 14.977, df 4, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: During this study, implementation of a post-code debriefing resulted in increased overall satisfaction with how codes had been conducted and there was a significant change in how staff felt in regards to code team leaders and an expectation of “returning to work.” However, there a noted overall decrease in perceptions of feeling supported by other staff involved during the code. Further studies in both community and academic-based ED settings are needed to further explore these complex relationships.