Cargando…
Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review
OBJECTIVES: “True” breast cancers, defined as not being visible on prior screening mammograms, are expected to be more aggressive than “missed” cancers, which are visible in retrospect. However, the evidence to support this hypothesis is limited. We compared the risk of death from any cause for wome...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33180162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07340-4 |
_version_ | 1783678395317485568 |
---|---|
author | Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M. Hovda, Tone Bhargava, Sameer Veierød, Marit B. Hofvind, Solveig |
author_facet | Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M. Hovda, Tone Bhargava, Sameer Veierød, Marit B. Hofvind, Solveig |
author_sort | Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: “True” breast cancers, defined as not being visible on prior screening mammograms, are expected to be more aggressive than “missed” cancers, which are visible in retrospect. However, the evidence to support this hypothesis is limited. We compared the risk of death from any cause for women with true, minimal signs, and missed invasive screen-detected (SDC) and interval breast cancers (IC). METHODS: This nation-wide study included 1022 SDC and 788 IC diagnosed through BreastScreen Norway during 2005–2016. Cancers were classified as true, minimal signs, or missed by five breast radiologists in a consensus-based informed review of prior screening and diagnostic images. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of death from any cause associated with true, minimal signs, and missed breast cancers, adjusting for age at diagnosis, histopathologic tumour diameter and grade, and subtype. Separate models were created for SDC and IC. RESULTS: Among SDC, 463 (44%) were classified as true and 242 (23%) as missed; among IC, 325 (39%) were classified as true and 235 (32%) missed. Missed SDC were associated with a similar risk of death as true SDC (HR = 1.20, 95% CI (0.49, 2.46)). Similar results were observed for missed versus true IC (HR = 1.31, 95% CI (0.77, 2.23)). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a statistical difference in the risk of death for women diagnosed with true or missed SDC or IC; however, the number of cases reviewed and follow-up time limited the precision of our estimates. KEY POINTS: • An informed radiological review classified screen-detected and interval cancers as true, minimal signs, or missed based on prior screening and diagnostic mammograms. • It has been hypothesised that true cancers, not visible on the prior screening examination, may be more aggressive than missed cancers. • We did not observe a statistical difference in the risk of death from any cause for women with missed versus true screen-detected or interval breast cancers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07340-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8043922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80439222021-04-27 Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M. Hovda, Tone Bhargava, Sameer Veierød, Marit B. Hofvind, Solveig Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVES: “True” breast cancers, defined as not being visible on prior screening mammograms, are expected to be more aggressive than “missed” cancers, which are visible in retrospect. However, the evidence to support this hypothesis is limited. We compared the risk of death from any cause for women with true, minimal signs, and missed invasive screen-detected (SDC) and interval breast cancers (IC). METHODS: This nation-wide study included 1022 SDC and 788 IC diagnosed through BreastScreen Norway during 2005–2016. Cancers were classified as true, minimal signs, or missed by five breast radiologists in a consensus-based informed review of prior screening and diagnostic images. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of death from any cause associated with true, minimal signs, and missed breast cancers, adjusting for age at diagnosis, histopathologic tumour diameter and grade, and subtype. Separate models were created for SDC and IC. RESULTS: Among SDC, 463 (44%) were classified as true and 242 (23%) as missed; among IC, 325 (39%) were classified as true and 235 (32%) missed. Missed SDC were associated with a similar risk of death as true SDC (HR = 1.20, 95% CI (0.49, 2.46)). Similar results were observed for missed versus true IC (HR = 1.31, 95% CI (0.77, 2.23)). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a statistical difference in the risk of death for women diagnosed with true or missed SDC or IC; however, the number of cases reviewed and follow-up time limited the precision of our estimates. KEY POINTS: • An informed radiological review classified screen-detected and interval cancers as true, minimal signs, or missed based on prior screening and diagnostic mammograms. • It has been hypothesised that true cancers, not visible on the prior screening examination, may be more aggressive than missed cancers. • We did not observe a statistical difference in the risk of death from any cause for women with missed versus true screen-detected or interval breast cancers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07340-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8043922/ /pubmed/33180162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07340-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Breast Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M. Hovda, Tone Bhargava, Sameer Veierød, Marit B. Hofvind, Solveig Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review |
title | Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review |
title_full | Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review |
title_fullStr | Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review |
title_short | Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review |
title_sort | survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33180162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07340-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsurudakaitlynm survivalamongwomendiagnosedwithscreendetectedorintervalbreastcancerclassifiedastrueminimalsignsormissedthroughaninformedradiologicalreview AT hovdatone survivalamongwomendiagnosedwithscreendetectedorintervalbreastcancerclassifiedastrueminimalsignsormissedthroughaninformedradiologicalreview AT bhargavasameer survivalamongwomendiagnosedwithscreendetectedorintervalbreastcancerclassifiedastrueminimalsignsormissedthroughaninformedradiologicalreview AT veierødmaritb survivalamongwomendiagnosedwithscreendetectedorintervalbreastcancerclassifiedastrueminimalsignsormissedthroughaninformedradiologicalreview AT hofvindsolveig survivalamongwomendiagnosedwithscreendetectedorintervalbreastcancerclassifiedastrueminimalsignsormissedthroughaninformedradiologicalreview |