Cargando…

Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance

OBJECTIVES: To assess how modifying multiple protocol parameters affects the dose and diagnostic performance of a neck CT protocol using patient-mimicking phantoms and task-based methods. METHODS: Six patient-mimicking neck phantoms containing hypodense lesions of 1 cm diameter and 30 HU contrast an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahnke, Paul, Conzelmann, Juliane, Genske, Ulrich, Nunninger, Maximilian, Scheel, Michael, Hamm, Bernd, Diekhoff, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8
_version_ 1783678397618061312
author Jahnke, Paul
Conzelmann, Juliane
Genske, Ulrich
Nunninger, Maximilian
Scheel, Michael
Hamm, Bernd
Diekhoff, Torsten
author_facet Jahnke, Paul
Conzelmann, Juliane
Genske, Ulrich
Nunninger, Maximilian
Scheel, Michael
Hamm, Bernd
Diekhoff, Torsten
author_sort Jahnke, Paul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess how modifying multiple protocol parameters affects the dose and diagnostic performance of a neck CT protocol using patient-mimicking phantoms and task-based methods. METHODS: Six patient-mimicking neck phantoms containing hypodense lesions of 1 cm diameter and 30 HU contrast and one non-lesion phantom were examined with 36 CT protocols. All possible combinations of the following parameters were investigated: 100- and 120-kVp tube voltage; tube current modulation (TCM) noise levels of SD 7.5, 10, and 14; pitches of 0.637, 0.813, and 1.388; filtered back projection (FBP); and iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D). Dose-length products (DLPs) and lesion detectability (assessed by 14 radiologists) were compared with the clinical standard protocol (120 kVp, TCM SD 7.5, 0.813 pitch, AIDR 3D). RESULTS: The DLP of the standard protocol was 25 mGy•cm; the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.839 (95%CI: 0.790–0.888). Combined effects of tube voltage reduction to 100 kVp and TCM noise level increase to SD 10 optimized protocol performance by improving dose (7.3 mGy•cm) and detectability (AUC 0.884, 95%CI: 0.844–0.924). Diagnostic performance was significantly affected by the TCM noise level at 120 kVp (AUC 0.821 at TCM SD 7.5 vs. 0.776 at TCM SD 14, p = 0.003), but not at 100-kVp tube voltage (AUC 0.839 at TCM SD 7.5 vs. 0.819 at TCM SD 14, p = 0.354), the reconstruction method at 100 kVp (AUC 0.854 for AIDR 3D vs. 0.806 for FBP, p < 0.001), but not at 120-kVp tube voltage (AUC 0.795 for AIDR 3D vs. 0.793 for FBP, p = 0.822), and the tube voltage for AIDR 3D reconstruction (p < 0.001), but not for FBP (p = 0.226). CONCLUSIONS: Combined effects of 100-kVp tube voltage, TCM noise level of SD 10, a pitch of 0.813, and AIDR 3D resulted in an optimal neck protocol in terms of dose and diagnostic performance. Protocol parameters were subject to complex interactions, which created opportunities for protocol improvement. KEY POINTS: • A task-based approach using patient-mimicking phantoms was employed to optimize a CT system for neck imaging through systematic testing of protocol parameters. • Combined effects of 100-kVp tube voltage, TCM noise level of SD 10, a pitch of 0.813, and AIDR 3D reconstruction resulted in an optimal protocol in terms of dose and diagnostic performance. • Interactions of protocol parameters affect diagnostic performance and should be considered when optimizing CT techniques. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8043932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80439322021-04-27 Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance Jahnke, Paul Conzelmann, Juliane Genske, Ulrich Nunninger, Maximilian Scheel, Michael Hamm, Bernd Diekhoff, Torsten Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: To assess how modifying multiple protocol parameters affects the dose and diagnostic performance of a neck CT protocol using patient-mimicking phantoms and task-based methods. METHODS: Six patient-mimicking neck phantoms containing hypodense lesions of 1 cm diameter and 30 HU contrast and one non-lesion phantom were examined with 36 CT protocols. All possible combinations of the following parameters were investigated: 100- and 120-kVp tube voltage; tube current modulation (TCM) noise levels of SD 7.5, 10, and 14; pitches of 0.637, 0.813, and 1.388; filtered back projection (FBP); and iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D). Dose-length products (DLPs) and lesion detectability (assessed by 14 radiologists) were compared with the clinical standard protocol (120 kVp, TCM SD 7.5, 0.813 pitch, AIDR 3D). RESULTS: The DLP of the standard protocol was 25 mGy•cm; the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.839 (95%CI: 0.790–0.888). Combined effects of tube voltage reduction to 100 kVp and TCM noise level increase to SD 10 optimized protocol performance by improving dose (7.3 mGy•cm) and detectability (AUC 0.884, 95%CI: 0.844–0.924). Diagnostic performance was significantly affected by the TCM noise level at 120 kVp (AUC 0.821 at TCM SD 7.5 vs. 0.776 at TCM SD 14, p = 0.003), but not at 100-kVp tube voltage (AUC 0.839 at TCM SD 7.5 vs. 0.819 at TCM SD 14, p = 0.354), the reconstruction method at 100 kVp (AUC 0.854 for AIDR 3D vs. 0.806 for FBP, p < 0.001), but not at 120-kVp tube voltage (AUC 0.795 for AIDR 3D vs. 0.793 for FBP, p = 0.822), and the tube voltage for AIDR 3D reconstruction (p < 0.001), but not for FBP (p = 0.226). CONCLUSIONS: Combined effects of 100-kVp tube voltage, TCM noise level of SD 10, a pitch of 0.813, and AIDR 3D resulted in an optimal neck protocol in terms of dose and diagnostic performance. Protocol parameters were subject to complex interactions, which created opportunities for protocol improvement. KEY POINTS: • A task-based approach using patient-mimicking phantoms was employed to optimize a CT system for neck imaging through systematic testing of protocol parameters. • Combined effects of 100-kVp tube voltage, TCM noise level of SD 10, a pitch of 0.813, and AIDR 3D reconstruction resulted in an optimal protocol in terms of dose and diagnostic performance. • Interactions of protocol parameters affect diagnostic performance and should be considered when optimizing CT techniques. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8043932/ /pubmed/33151393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
Jahnke, Paul
Conzelmann, Juliane
Genske, Ulrich
Nunninger, Maximilian
Scheel, Michael
Hamm, Bernd
Diekhoff, Torsten
Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance
title Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance
title_full Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance
title_fullStr Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance
title_full_unstemmed Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance
title_short Task-based assessment of neck CT protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance
title_sort task-based assessment of neck ct protocols using patient-mimicking phantoms—effects of protocol parameters on dose and diagnostic performance
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33151393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07374-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jahnkepaul taskbasedassessmentofneckctprotocolsusingpatientmimickingphantomseffectsofprotocolparametersondoseanddiagnosticperformance
AT conzelmannjuliane taskbasedassessmentofneckctprotocolsusingpatientmimickingphantomseffectsofprotocolparametersondoseanddiagnosticperformance
AT genskeulrich taskbasedassessmentofneckctprotocolsusingpatientmimickingphantomseffectsofprotocolparametersondoseanddiagnosticperformance
AT nunningermaximilian taskbasedassessmentofneckctprotocolsusingpatientmimickingphantomseffectsofprotocolparametersondoseanddiagnosticperformance
AT scheelmichael taskbasedassessmentofneckctprotocolsusingpatientmimickingphantomseffectsofprotocolparametersondoseanddiagnosticperformance
AT hammbernd taskbasedassessmentofneckctprotocolsusingpatientmimickingphantomseffectsofprotocolparametersondoseanddiagnosticperformance
AT diekhofftorsten taskbasedassessmentofneckctprotocolsusingpatientmimickingphantomseffectsofprotocolparametersondoseanddiagnosticperformance