Cargando…

Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel

BACKGROUND: Fetal echogenic bowel (FEB) is associated with an increased risk of poor pregnant outcomes; however, karyotyping fails to detect copy number variations (CNVs) in FEB. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for detection of FEB. METHODS: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Xiangqun, Huang, Hailong, Lin, Xiyao, Xue, Huili, Cai, Meiying, Lin, Na, Xu, Liangpu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8044071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859509
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S299806
_version_ 1783678407751499776
author Fan, Xiangqun
Huang, Hailong
Lin, Xiyao
Xue, Huili
Cai, Meiying
Lin, Na
Xu, Liangpu
author_facet Fan, Xiangqun
Huang, Hailong
Lin, Xiyao
Xue, Huili
Cai, Meiying
Lin, Na
Xu, Liangpu
author_sort Fan, Xiangqun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fetal echogenic bowel (FEB) is associated with an increased risk of poor pregnant outcomes; however, karyotyping fails to detect copy number variations (CNVs) in FEB. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for detection of FEB. METHODS: The medical records of 147 pregnant women with FEB recruited during December 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed, and prenatal samples were collected for karyotyping and CMA. The detection of chromosomal abnormality was compared between karyotyping and CMA. RESULTS: Karyotyping identified eight cases with abnormal karyotypes (5.44% prevalence), including four fetuses with pathogenic aneuploidy, three with chromosome polymorphism and one with balanced chromosome translocation. CMA identified 13 abnormal CNVs (8.84% prevalence), including 4 fetuses with pathogenic aneuploidy as detected by karyotyping and 9 additional CNVs with normal karyotypes; however, CMA failed to detect chromosome polymorphism and balanced chromosome translocation. In fetuses with isolated FEB, no cases presented pathogenic findings and CMA detected two cases with variants of uncertain significance (VOUS). In cases presenting FEB along with other ultrasound abnormalities, CMA detected three cases with pathogenic CNVs and four cases with VOUS in addition to four cases with aneuploidy. There was no significant difference in the detection of abnormal CNVs between the fetuses with echogenic bowel alone and along with other ultrasound abnormalities (10% vs 8.67%, P > 0.05). Except 9 fetuses lost to the follow-up, the other 138 fetuses with echogenic bowel were successfully followed up. Pregnancy was terminated in 5 fetuses with chromosomal abnormality, 2 with pathogenic CNVs and 1 with VOUS, and other 16 with normal karyotypes and CMA findings but showing ultrasound abnormalities or multiple malformations. CONCLUSION: Isolated FEB is associated with a good prognosis, and a satisfactory pregnant outcome is expected for fetuses with echogenic bowel that are negative for chromosomal anomalies and other severe structure abnormalities. CMA shows an important value in the genetic diagnosis of FEB. As a supplement to karyotyping, CMA may improve the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of fetal intestinal malformations in pregnant women with FEB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8044071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80440712021-04-14 Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel Fan, Xiangqun Huang, Hailong Lin, Xiyao Xue, Huili Cai, Meiying Lin, Na Xu, Liangpu Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research BACKGROUND: Fetal echogenic bowel (FEB) is associated with an increased risk of poor pregnant outcomes; however, karyotyping fails to detect copy number variations (CNVs) in FEB. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for detection of FEB. METHODS: The medical records of 147 pregnant women with FEB recruited during December 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed, and prenatal samples were collected for karyotyping and CMA. The detection of chromosomal abnormality was compared between karyotyping and CMA. RESULTS: Karyotyping identified eight cases with abnormal karyotypes (5.44% prevalence), including four fetuses with pathogenic aneuploidy, three with chromosome polymorphism and one with balanced chromosome translocation. CMA identified 13 abnormal CNVs (8.84% prevalence), including 4 fetuses with pathogenic aneuploidy as detected by karyotyping and 9 additional CNVs with normal karyotypes; however, CMA failed to detect chromosome polymorphism and balanced chromosome translocation. In fetuses with isolated FEB, no cases presented pathogenic findings and CMA detected two cases with variants of uncertain significance (VOUS). In cases presenting FEB along with other ultrasound abnormalities, CMA detected three cases with pathogenic CNVs and four cases with VOUS in addition to four cases with aneuploidy. There was no significant difference in the detection of abnormal CNVs between the fetuses with echogenic bowel alone and along with other ultrasound abnormalities (10% vs 8.67%, P > 0.05). Except 9 fetuses lost to the follow-up, the other 138 fetuses with echogenic bowel were successfully followed up. Pregnancy was terminated in 5 fetuses with chromosomal abnormality, 2 with pathogenic CNVs and 1 with VOUS, and other 16 with normal karyotypes and CMA findings but showing ultrasound abnormalities or multiple malformations. CONCLUSION: Isolated FEB is associated with a good prognosis, and a satisfactory pregnant outcome is expected for fetuses with echogenic bowel that are negative for chromosomal anomalies and other severe structure abnormalities. CMA shows an important value in the genetic diagnosis of FEB. As a supplement to karyotyping, CMA may improve the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of fetal intestinal malformations in pregnant women with FEB. Dove 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8044071/ /pubmed/33859509 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S299806 Text en © 2021 Fan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Fan, Xiangqun
Huang, Hailong
Lin, Xiyao
Xue, Huili
Cai, Meiying
Lin, Na
Xu, Liangpu
Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel
title Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel
title_full Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel
title_fullStr Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel
title_short Performance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detection of Copy Number Variations in Fetal Echogenic Bowel
title_sort performance of chromosomal microarray analysis for detection of copy number variations in fetal echogenic bowel
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8044071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859509
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S299806
work_keys_str_mv AT fanxiangqun performanceofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisfordetectionofcopynumbervariationsinfetalechogenicbowel
AT huanghailong performanceofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisfordetectionofcopynumbervariationsinfetalechogenicbowel
AT linxiyao performanceofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisfordetectionofcopynumbervariationsinfetalechogenicbowel
AT xuehuili performanceofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisfordetectionofcopynumbervariationsinfetalechogenicbowel
AT caimeiying performanceofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisfordetectionofcopynumbervariationsinfetalechogenicbowel
AT linna performanceofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisfordetectionofcopynumbervariationsinfetalechogenicbowel
AT xuliangpu performanceofchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisfordetectionofcopynumbervariationsinfetalechogenicbowel