Cargando…

Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual IOR when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Xiaoyu, Wang, Xueli, Peng, Xing, Li, Qi, Zhang, Chi, Wang, Aijun, Zhang, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8044137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86999-1
_version_ 1783678422550052864
author Tang, Xiaoyu
Wang, Xueli
Peng, Xing
Li, Qi
Zhang, Chi
Wang, Aijun
Zhang, Ming
author_facet Tang, Xiaoyu
Wang, Xueli
Peng, Xing
Li, Qi
Zhang, Chi
Wang, Aijun
Zhang, Ming
author_sort Tang, Xiaoyu
collection PubMed
description Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual IOR when focusing on both visual and auditory modalities. Utilising the high temporal resolution of the event-related potential (ERP) technique we explored the possible neural correlates with the behaviour IOR difference between visual and audiovisual targets. The behavioural results revealed that the visual IOR was larger than the audiovisual IOR. The ERP results showed that the visual IOR effect was generated from the P1 and N2 components, while the audiovisual IOR effect was derived only from the P3 component. Multisensory integration (MSI) of audiovisual targets occurred on the P1, N1 and P3 components, which may offset the reduced perceptual processing due to audiovisual IOR. The results of early and late differences in the neural processing of the visual IOR and audiovisual IOR imply that the two target types may have different inhibitory orientation mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8044137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80441372021-04-14 Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return Tang, Xiaoyu Wang, Xueli Peng, Xing Li, Qi Zhang, Chi Wang, Aijun Zhang, Ming Sci Rep Article Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual IOR when focusing on both visual and auditory modalities. Utilising the high temporal resolution of the event-related potential (ERP) technique we explored the possible neural correlates with the behaviour IOR difference between visual and audiovisual targets. The behavioural results revealed that the visual IOR was larger than the audiovisual IOR. The ERP results showed that the visual IOR effect was generated from the P1 and N2 components, while the audiovisual IOR effect was derived only from the P3 component. Multisensory integration (MSI) of audiovisual targets occurred on the P1, N1 and P3 components, which may offset the reduced perceptual processing due to audiovisual IOR. The results of early and late differences in the neural processing of the visual IOR and audiovisual IOR imply that the two target types may have different inhibitory orientation mechanisms. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8044137/ /pubmed/33850180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86999-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Tang, Xiaoyu
Wang, Xueli
Peng, Xing
Li, Qi
Zhang, Chi
Wang, Aijun
Zhang, Ming
Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_full Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_fullStr Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_short Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
title_sort electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8044137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86999-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tangxiaoyu electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT wangxueli electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT pengxing electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT liqi electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT zhangchi electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT wangaijun electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn
AT zhangming electrophysiologicalevidenceofdifferentneuralprocessingbetweenvisualandaudiovisualinhibitionofreturn