Cargando…
Metacognitive Labeling of Contentious Claims: Facts, Opinions, and Conspiracy Theories
Congenial information is often judged to be more valid than uncongenial (but otherwise equivalent) information. The present research explores a related possibility concerning the process by which people label a claim as fundamentally factual (open to proof or disproof) or opinion (a matter of person...
Autores principales: | Brotherton, Robert, Son, Lisa K. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8044776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868118 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644657 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Book Review: Fact and Fiction in Global Energy Policy. 15 Contentious Questions
por: Perlaviciute, Goda
Publicado: (2017) -
Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale
por: Brotherton, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Social Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of the Jewish Conspiracy Theory in Malaysia
por: Swami, Viren
Publicado: (2012) -
COVID-19: the trends of conspiracy theories vs facts
por: Bernard, Favour Obianujunwam, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Who Believes in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories in Croatia? Prevalence and Predictors of Conspiracy Beliefs
por: Tonković, Mirjana, et al.
Publicado: (2021)