Cargando…

Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale

Background: Engaging in end-of-life care considerations is beneficial when the time is right. The purpose of this study is to provide a valid instrument to assess peoples readiness for end-of-life conversations before they are initiated. Materials and Methods: A community sample was recruited in stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berlin, Pia, Leppin, Nico, Nagelschmidt, Katharina, Seifart, Carola, Rief, Winfried, von Blanckenburg, Pia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8044973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662654
_version_ 1783678606591918080
author Berlin, Pia
Leppin, Nico
Nagelschmidt, Katharina
Seifart, Carola
Rief, Winfried
von Blanckenburg, Pia
author_facet Berlin, Pia
Leppin, Nico
Nagelschmidt, Katharina
Seifart, Carola
Rief, Winfried
von Blanckenburg, Pia
author_sort Berlin, Pia
collection PubMed
description Background: Engaging in end-of-life care considerations is beneficial when the time is right. The purpose of this study is to provide a valid instrument to assess peoples readiness for end-of-life conversations before they are initiated. Materials and Methods: A community sample was recruited in study one for exploratory factor analysis of a 13-item questionnaire. In study two, psychometric properties were analyzed with structural equation modeling in a population affected by cancer. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed with questionnaires measuring distress, depression, anxiety, fear of progression, and distress of death and dying. Results: In study one (N = 349) exploratory factor analysis resulted in three subscales readiness (α = 0.84), communication (α = 0.76), and values (α = 0.56) with a possible common factor (α = 0.84) for a community sample. In study two (N = 84) the three-factor solution with 13 items was not supported for cancer patients. Factor structure was adapted to 12 items with one common factor readiness (α = 0.87). Model fit was good: χ(2)(50) = 59.18, p>0.05 (Satorra-Bentler-correction = 1.27), with χ(2)/df = 1.184, rRMSEA = 0.053 (90%-CI[0.000;0.100]), and rSRMR = 0.072. Convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations to trait gratitude, ratings of readiness to provide a living will or talk with family about the end of life. Divergent validity was supported by no or small correlation with distress, depression, general and death anxiety and fear of progression, respectively. Conclusions: Results support usage of the REOLC Scale in different settings with adapted factor structure. The questionnaire is interpreted as valid and reliable instrument to assess objective readiness for end-of-life conversations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8044973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80449732021-04-15 Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale Berlin, Pia Leppin, Nico Nagelschmidt, Katharina Seifart, Carola Rief, Winfried von Blanckenburg, Pia Front Psychol Psychology Background: Engaging in end-of-life care considerations is beneficial when the time is right. The purpose of this study is to provide a valid instrument to assess peoples readiness for end-of-life conversations before they are initiated. Materials and Methods: A community sample was recruited in study one for exploratory factor analysis of a 13-item questionnaire. In study two, psychometric properties were analyzed with structural equation modeling in a population affected by cancer. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed with questionnaires measuring distress, depression, anxiety, fear of progression, and distress of death and dying. Results: In study one (N = 349) exploratory factor analysis resulted in three subscales readiness (α = 0.84), communication (α = 0.76), and values (α = 0.56) with a possible common factor (α = 0.84) for a community sample. In study two (N = 84) the three-factor solution with 13 items was not supported for cancer patients. Factor structure was adapted to 12 items with one common factor readiness (α = 0.87). Model fit was good: χ(2)(50) = 59.18, p>0.05 (Satorra-Bentler-correction = 1.27), with χ(2)/df = 1.184, rRMSEA = 0.053 (90%-CI[0.000;0.100]), and rSRMR = 0.072. Convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations to trait gratitude, ratings of readiness to provide a living will or talk with family about the end of life. Divergent validity was supported by no or small correlation with distress, depression, general and death anxiety and fear of progression, respectively. Conclusions: Results support usage of the REOLC Scale in different settings with adapted factor structure. The questionnaire is interpreted as valid and reliable instrument to assess objective readiness for end-of-life conversations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8044973/ /pubmed/33868137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662654 Text en Copyright © 2021 Berlin, Leppin, Nagelschmidt, Seifart, Rief and von Blanckenburg. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Berlin, Pia
Leppin, Nico
Nagelschmidt, Katharina
Seifart, Carola
Rief, Winfried
von Blanckenburg, Pia
Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale
title Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale
title_full Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale
title_fullStr Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale
title_short Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale
title_sort development and validation of the readiness for end-of-life conversations (reolc) scale
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8044973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662654
work_keys_str_mv AT berlinpia developmentandvalidationofthereadinessforendoflifeconversationsreolcscale
AT leppinnico developmentandvalidationofthereadinessforendoflifeconversationsreolcscale
AT nagelschmidtkatharina developmentandvalidationofthereadinessforendoflifeconversationsreolcscale
AT seifartcarola developmentandvalidationofthereadinessforendoflifeconversationsreolcscale
AT riefwinfried developmentandvalidationofthereadinessforendoflifeconversationsreolcscale
AT vonblanckenburgpia developmentandvalidationofthereadinessforendoflifeconversationsreolcscale