Cargando…

Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopy is a common procedure used for evaluation of suspicious lung nodules, but the low diagnostic sensitivity of bronchoscopy often results in inconclusive results and delays in treatment. Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) was developed to assist with patient managemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Marla K., Wu, Shuyang, Pankratz, Daniel G., Fedorowicz, Grazyna, Anderson, Jessica, Ding, Jie, Wong, Mei, Cao, Manqiu, Babiarz, Joshua, Lofaro, Lori, Walsh, P. Sean, Kennedy, Giulia C., Huang, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08130-x
_version_ 1783678632310341632
author Johnson, Marla K.
Wu, Shuyang
Pankratz, Daniel G.
Fedorowicz, Grazyna
Anderson, Jessica
Ding, Jie
Wong, Mei
Cao, Manqiu
Babiarz, Joshua
Lofaro, Lori
Walsh, P. Sean
Kennedy, Giulia C.
Huang, Jing
author_facet Johnson, Marla K.
Wu, Shuyang
Pankratz, Daniel G.
Fedorowicz, Grazyna
Anderson, Jessica
Ding, Jie
Wong, Mei
Cao, Manqiu
Babiarz, Joshua
Lofaro, Lori
Walsh, P. Sean
Kennedy, Giulia C.
Huang, Jing
author_sort Johnson, Marla K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopy is a common procedure used for evaluation of suspicious lung nodules, but the low diagnostic sensitivity of bronchoscopy often results in inconclusive results and delays in treatment. Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) was developed to assist with patient management in cases where bronchoscopy is inconclusive. Studies have shown that exposure to tobacco smoke alters gene expression in airway epithelial cells in a way that indicates an increased risk of developing lung cancer. Percepta GSC leverages this idea of a molecular “field of injury” from smoking and was developed using RNA sequencing data generated from lung bronchial brushings of the upper airway. A Percepta GSC score is calculated from an ensemble of machine learning algorithms utilizing clinical and genomic features and is used to refine a patient’s risk stratification. METHODS: The objective of the analysis described and reported here is to validate the analytical performance of Percepta GSC. Analytical performance studies characterized the sensitivity of Percepta GSC test results to input RNA quantity, the potentially interfering agents of blood and genomic DNA, and the reproducibility of test results within and between processing runs and between laboratories. RESULTS: Varying the amount of input RNA into the assay across a nominal range had no significant impact on Percepta GSC classifier results. Bronchial brushing RNA contaminated with up to 10% genomic DNA by nucleic acid mass also showed no significant difference on classifier results. The addition of blood RNA, a potential contaminant in the bronchial brushing sample, caused no change to classifier results at up to 11% contamination by RNA proportion. Percepta GSC scores were reproducible between runs, within runs, and between laboratories, varying within less than 4% of the total score range (standard deviation of 0.169 for scores on 4.57 scale). CONCLUSIONS: The analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, and reproducibility of Percepta GSC laboratory results were successfully demonstrated under conditions of expected day to day variation in testing. Percepta GSC test results are analytically robust and suitable for routine clinical use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08130-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8045183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80451832021-04-14 Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules Johnson, Marla K. Wu, Shuyang Pankratz, Daniel G. Fedorowicz, Grazyna Anderson, Jessica Ding, Jie Wong, Mei Cao, Manqiu Babiarz, Joshua Lofaro, Lori Walsh, P. Sean Kennedy, Giulia C. Huang, Jing BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopy is a common procedure used for evaluation of suspicious lung nodules, but the low diagnostic sensitivity of bronchoscopy often results in inconclusive results and delays in treatment. Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) was developed to assist with patient management in cases where bronchoscopy is inconclusive. Studies have shown that exposure to tobacco smoke alters gene expression in airway epithelial cells in a way that indicates an increased risk of developing lung cancer. Percepta GSC leverages this idea of a molecular “field of injury” from smoking and was developed using RNA sequencing data generated from lung bronchial brushings of the upper airway. A Percepta GSC score is calculated from an ensemble of machine learning algorithms utilizing clinical and genomic features and is used to refine a patient’s risk stratification. METHODS: The objective of the analysis described and reported here is to validate the analytical performance of Percepta GSC. Analytical performance studies characterized the sensitivity of Percepta GSC test results to input RNA quantity, the potentially interfering agents of blood and genomic DNA, and the reproducibility of test results within and between processing runs and between laboratories. RESULTS: Varying the amount of input RNA into the assay across a nominal range had no significant impact on Percepta GSC classifier results. Bronchial brushing RNA contaminated with up to 10% genomic DNA by nucleic acid mass also showed no significant difference on classifier results. The addition of blood RNA, a potential contaminant in the bronchial brushing sample, caused no change to classifier results at up to 11% contamination by RNA proportion. Percepta GSC scores were reproducible between runs, within runs, and between laboratories, varying within less than 4% of the total score range (standard deviation of 0.169 for scores on 4.57 scale). CONCLUSIONS: The analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, and reproducibility of Percepta GSC laboratory results were successfully demonstrated under conditions of expected day to day variation in testing. Percepta GSC test results are analytically robust and suitable for routine clinical use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08130-x. BioMed Central 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8045183/ /pubmed/33849470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08130-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Marla K.
Wu, Shuyang
Pankratz, Daniel G.
Fedorowicz, Grazyna
Anderson, Jessica
Ding, Jie
Wong, Mei
Cao, Manqiu
Babiarz, Joshua
Lofaro, Lori
Walsh, P. Sean
Kennedy, Giulia C.
Huang, Jing
Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules
title Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules
title_full Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules
title_fullStr Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules
title_full_unstemmed Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules
title_short Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules
title_sort analytical validation of the percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an rna next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of lung cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08130-x
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonmarlak analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT wushuyang analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT pankratzdanielg analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT fedorowiczgrazyna analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT andersonjessica analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT dingjie analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT wongmei analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT caomanqiu analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT babiarzjoshua analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT lofarolori analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT walshpsean analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT kennedygiuliac analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules
AT huangjing analyticalvalidationoftheperceptagenomicsequencingclassifieranrnanextgenerationsequencingassayfortheassessmentoflungcancerriskofsuspiciouspulmonarynodules