Cargando…

High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients

BACKGROUND: Preoperative tumor markers, inflammation, and nutritional status are considered important predictors of prognosis and tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This study aims to explore the prognostic and predictive role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the Fib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Siyi, Liu, Zhenzhen, Wang, Bingyan, Li, Fei, Meng, Yan, Wang, Junwei, Wang, Yuxia, Wang, Hao, Zhou, Xin, Fu, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01903-1
_version_ 1783678633050636288
author Lu, Siyi
Liu, Zhenzhen
Wang, Bingyan
Li, Fei
Meng, Yan
Wang, Junwei
Wang, Yuxia
Wang, Hao
Zhou, Xin
Fu, Wei
author_facet Lu, Siyi
Liu, Zhenzhen
Wang, Bingyan
Li, Fei
Meng, Yan
Wang, Junwei
Wang, Yuxia
Wang, Hao
Zhou, Xin
Fu, Wei
author_sort Lu, Siyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preoperative tumor markers, inflammation, and nutritional status are considered important predictors of prognosis and tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This study aims to explore the prognostic and predictive role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the Fibrinogen-Albumin Ratio Index (FARI), the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in LARC patients and compared them with a novel combined CEA-FARI-PNI (CFP) scoring system. METHODS: A total of 138 LARC patients undergoing radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) between January 2012 and March 2019 were enrolled. The X-tile program was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of CEA, FARI, and PNI, and CFP scoring system was constructed accordingly. The prognostic ability of these factors was assessed by the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Kaplan–Meier, Cox regression, and logistic regression. Nomogram was established to evaluate the predictive role of these factors in tumor response. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off values of CEA, FARI, and PNI were 5.15 ng/l, 10.56%, and 42.25 g/L, respectively. The time-dependent ROC curve showed that compared to CEA, FARI, and PNI, CFP showed stable predictive efficacy for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In multivariate analysis, CFP was the only factor that could independently predict OS (HR = 8.117, p = 0.001) and DFS (HR = 4.994, p < 0.001). Moreover, high CFP (OR = 3.693, p = 0.002) was also an independent risk factor of poor response. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the nomograms for predicting tumor response was better including CFP (0.717) than without CFP (0.656) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The CFP score was a more reliable marker for predicting OS, DFS, and NCRT efficacy in LARC patients, and the score could apparently improve predicted efficacy of the nomogram. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-021-01903-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8045186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80451862021-04-14 High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients Lu, Siyi Liu, Zhenzhen Wang, Bingyan Li, Fei Meng, Yan Wang, Junwei Wang, Yuxia Wang, Hao Zhou, Xin Fu, Wei Cancer Cell Int Primary Research BACKGROUND: Preoperative tumor markers, inflammation, and nutritional status are considered important predictors of prognosis and tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This study aims to explore the prognostic and predictive role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the Fibrinogen-Albumin Ratio Index (FARI), the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in LARC patients and compared them with a novel combined CEA-FARI-PNI (CFP) scoring system. METHODS: A total of 138 LARC patients undergoing radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) between January 2012 and March 2019 were enrolled. The X-tile program was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of CEA, FARI, and PNI, and CFP scoring system was constructed accordingly. The prognostic ability of these factors was assessed by the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Kaplan–Meier, Cox regression, and logistic regression. Nomogram was established to evaluate the predictive role of these factors in tumor response. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off values of CEA, FARI, and PNI were 5.15 ng/l, 10.56%, and 42.25 g/L, respectively. The time-dependent ROC curve showed that compared to CEA, FARI, and PNI, CFP showed stable predictive efficacy for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In multivariate analysis, CFP was the only factor that could independently predict OS (HR = 8.117, p = 0.001) and DFS (HR = 4.994, p < 0.001). Moreover, high CFP (OR = 3.693, p = 0.002) was also an independent risk factor of poor response. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the nomograms for predicting tumor response was better including CFP (0.717) than without CFP (0.656) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The CFP score was a more reliable marker for predicting OS, DFS, and NCRT efficacy in LARC patients, and the score could apparently improve predicted efficacy of the nomogram. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-021-01903-1. BioMed Central 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8045186/ /pubmed/33849545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01903-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Primary Research
Lu, Siyi
Liu, Zhenzhen
Wang, Bingyan
Li, Fei
Meng, Yan
Wang, Junwei
Wang, Yuxia
Wang, Hao
Zhou, Xin
Fu, Wei
High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients
title High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients
title_full High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients
title_fullStr High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients
title_full_unstemmed High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients
title_short High CFP score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in LARC patients
title_sort high cfp score indicates poor prognosis and chemoradiotherapy response in larc patients
topic Primary Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01903-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lusiyi highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT liuzhenzhen highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT wangbingyan highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT lifei highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT mengyan highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT wangjunwei highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT wangyuxia highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT wanghao highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT zhouxin highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients
AT fuwei highcfpscoreindicatespoorprognosisandchemoradiotherapyresponseinlarcpatients