Cargando…

Discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice

BACKGROUND: The reliability of the registered ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry has been questioned. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate this parameter in the registry by comparing the registered ligation levels with a postoper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wikner, Franciska, Matthiessen, Peter, Sörelius, Karl, Legrell, Petter, Rutegård, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02222-5
_version_ 1783678659433857024
author Wikner, Franciska
Matthiessen, Peter
Sörelius, Karl
Legrell, Petter
Rutegård, Martin
author_facet Wikner, Franciska
Matthiessen, Peter
Sörelius, Karl
Legrell, Petter
Rutegård, Martin
author_sort Wikner, Franciska
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reliability of the registered ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry has been questioned. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate this parameter in the registry by comparing the registered ligation levels with a postoperative computed tomography angiography (CT-angiography) in patients operated for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients operated for rectal cancer at two Swedish university hospitals were prospectively included between December 2016 and December 2019. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, an additional CT-angiography was performed and independently examined by two radiologists. The radiological assessment of the ligation level was compared to registry data, using different measures of agreement. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included, 55 (59%) were men and 39 (41%) women. All patients underwent abdominal resection: conventional or robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, n=56 (60%), or open resection, n=38 (40%). The ligation level as assessed on CT-angiography was high in 29 (31%) patients and low in 65 (69%). The registered level of ligation of the IMA and the radiological assessment of the CT-angiographies were consistent in 77/94 cases, demonstrating an 82% agreement and a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 72%, respectively. The estimated Kappa value was 0.58, reaching 0.64 after prevalence bias adjustment. CONCLUSION: This study showed that CT-angiography can be used to evaluate the reliability of the registered ligation level in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The demonstrated agreement between the registry and postoperative CT-angiography was moderate to good. This discrepancy impacts registry-based research using IMA ligation data and may ultimately influence surgical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials identifier NCT03875612 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02222-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8045315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80453152021-04-14 Discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice Wikner, Franciska Matthiessen, Peter Sörelius, Karl Legrell, Petter Rutegård, Martin World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The reliability of the registered ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry has been questioned. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate this parameter in the registry by comparing the registered ligation levels with a postoperative computed tomography angiography (CT-angiography) in patients operated for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients operated for rectal cancer at two Swedish university hospitals were prospectively included between December 2016 and December 2019. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, an additional CT-angiography was performed and independently examined by two radiologists. The radiological assessment of the ligation level was compared to registry data, using different measures of agreement. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included, 55 (59%) were men and 39 (41%) women. All patients underwent abdominal resection: conventional or robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, n=56 (60%), or open resection, n=38 (40%). The ligation level as assessed on CT-angiography was high in 29 (31%) patients and low in 65 (69%). The registered level of ligation of the IMA and the radiological assessment of the CT-angiographies were consistent in 77/94 cases, demonstrating an 82% agreement and a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 72%, respectively. The estimated Kappa value was 0.58, reaching 0.64 after prevalence bias adjustment. CONCLUSION: This study showed that CT-angiography can be used to evaluate the reliability of the registered ligation level in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The demonstrated agreement between the registry and postoperative CT-angiography was moderate to good. This discrepancy impacts registry-based research using IMA ligation data and may ultimately influence surgical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials identifier NCT03875612 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02222-5. BioMed Central 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8045315/ /pubmed/33849560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02222-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wikner, Franciska
Matthiessen, Peter
Sörelius, Karl
Legrell, Petter
Rutegård, Martin
Discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice
title Discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice
title_full Discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice
title_fullStr Discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice
title_short Discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice
title_sort discrepancy between surgeon and radiological assessment of ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients operated for rectal cancer—impacting registry-based research and surgical practice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02222-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wiknerfranciska discrepancybetweensurgeonandradiologicalassessmentofligationleveloftheinferiormesentericarteryinpatientsoperatedforrectalcancerimpactingregistrybasedresearchandsurgicalpractice
AT matthiessenpeter discrepancybetweensurgeonandradiologicalassessmentofligationleveloftheinferiormesentericarteryinpatientsoperatedforrectalcancerimpactingregistrybasedresearchandsurgicalpractice
AT soreliuskarl discrepancybetweensurgeonandradiologicalassessmentofligationleveloftheinferiormesentericarteryinpatientsoperatedforrectalcancerimpactingregistrybasedresearchandsurgicalpractice
AT legrellpetter discrepancybetweensurgeonandradiologicalassessmentofligationleveloftheinferiormesentericarteryinpatientsoperatedforrectalcancerimpactingregistrybasedresearchandsurgicalpractice
AT rutegardmartin discrepancybetweensurgeonandradiologicalassessmentofligationleveloftheinferiormesentericarteryinpatientsoperatedforrectalcancerimpactingregistrybasedresearchandsurgicalpractice