Cargando…

Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening can reduce the incidence and mortality through early detection. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer are at high risk for colorectal cancer and therefore require colonoscopy. However, despite the high risk, screening adherence among...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xueying, Zhang, Yiheng, Chen, Jingyu, Zhang, Meifen, Gong, Ni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10786-w
_version_ 1783678673599070208
author Zhang, Xueying
Zhang, Yiheng
Chen, Jingyu
Zhang, Meifen
Gong, Ni
author_facet Zhang, Xueying
Zhang, Yiheng
Chen, Jingyu
Zhang, Meifen
Gong, Ni
author_sort Zhang, Xueying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening can reduce the incidence and mortality through early detection. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer are at high risk for colorectal cancer and therefore require colonoscopy. However, despite the high risk, screening adherence among FDRs remains low and the barriers to undergoing screening among FDRs in China are not clear. We explored the reasons why FDRs refused screening. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 28 semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted face-to-face. Participants were recruited at two hospitals (an urban tertiary hospital and a community health center) in Guangzhou, South China. We used qualitative content analysis to analyze transcripts based on audio recordings and identify major themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged related to FDRs’ low screening participation. First, the emotional distance between FDRs and medicine was pulled away by uncomfortable feelings approaching hospitals and misunderstanding of cancer. Second, they confirmed their health state and minimized cancer risk if they had no signs in routine health examination, no symptoms and maintained a healthy, happy life. Third, they considered screening far from their daily life from the perspective of spatial distance and priority. Therefore, screening was not necessary in their view. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals should narrow psychological distance between people and screening when promoting screening technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10786-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8045384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80453842021-04-14 Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients Zhang, Xueying Zhang, Yiheng Chen, Jingyu Zhang, Meifen Gong, Ni BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening can reduce the incidence and mortality through early detection. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer are at high risk for colorectal cancer and therefore require colonoscopy. However, despite the high risk, screening adherence among FDRs remains low and the barriers to undergoing screening among FDRs in China are not clear. We explored the reasons why FDRs refused screening. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 28 semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted face-to-face. Participants were recruited at two hospitals (an urban tertiary hospital and a community health center) in Guangzhou, South China. We used qualitative content analysis to analyze transcripts based on audio recordings and identify major themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged related to FDRs’ low screening participation. First, the emotional distance between FDRs and medicine was pulled away by uncomfortable feelings approaching hospitals and misunderstanding of cancer. Second, they confirmed their health state and minimized cancer risk if they had no signs in routine health examination, no symptoms and maintained a healthy, happy life. Third, they considered screening far from their daily life from the perspective of spatial distance and priority. Therefore, screening was not necessary in their view. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals should narrow psychological distance between people and screening when promoting screening technology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10786-w. BioMed Central 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8045384/ /pubmed/33849506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10786-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Xueying
Zhang, Yiheng
Chen, Jingyu
Zhang, Meifen
Gong, Ni
Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
title Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
title_full Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
title_fullStr Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
title_short Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
title_sort psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10786-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxueying psychologicaldistanceaqualitativestudyofscreeningbarriersamongfirstdegreerelativesofcolorectalcancerpatients
AT zhangyiheng psychologicaldistanceaqualitativestudyofscreeningbarriersamongfirstdegreerelativesofcolorectalcancerpatients
AT chenjingyu psychologicaldistanceaqualitativestudyofscreeningbarriersamongfirstdegreerelativesofcolorectalcancerpatients
AT zhangmeifen psychologicaldistanceaqualitativestudyofscreeningbarriersamongfirstdegreerelativesofcolorectalcancerpatients
AT gongni psychologicaldistanceaqualitativestudyofscreeningbarriersamongfirstdegreerelativesofcolorectalcancerpatients