Cargando…

Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules

BACKGROUND: Conventional methods for phase I dose-escalation trials in oncology are based on a single treatment schedule only. More recently, however, multiple schedules are more frequently investigated in the same trial. METHODS: Here, we consider sequential phase I trials, where the trial proceeds...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Günhan, Burak Kürsad, Weber, Sebastian, Seroutou, Abdelkader, Friede, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01218-9
_version_ 1783678678172958720
author Günhan, Burak Kürsad
Weber, Sebastian
Seroutou, Abdelkader
Friede, Tim
author_facet Günhan, Burak Kürsad
Weber, Sebastian
Seroutou, Abdelkader
Friede, Tim
author_sort Günhan, Burak Kürsad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventional methods for phase I dose-escalation trials in oncology are based on a single treatment schedule only. More recently, however, multiple schedules are more frequently investigated in the same trial. METHODS: Here, we consider sequential phase I trials, where the trial proceeds with a new schedule (e.g. daily or weekly dosing) once the dose escalation with another schedule has been completed. The aim is to utilize the information from both the completed and the ongoing schedules to inform decisions on the dose level for the next dose cohort. For this purpose, we adapted the time-to-event pharmacokinetics (TITE-PK) model, which were originally developed for simultaneous investigation of multiple schedules. TITE-PK integrates information from multiple schedules using a pharmacokinetics (PK) model. RESULTS: In a simulation study, the developed approach is compared to the bridging continual reassessment method and the Bayesian logistic regression model using a meta-analytic-predictive prior. TITE-PK results in better performance than comparators in terms of recommending acceptable dose and avoiding overly toxic doses for sequential phase I trials in most of the scenarios considered. Furthermore, better performance of TITE-PK is achieved while requiring similar number of patients in the simulated trials. For the scenarios involving one schedule, TITE-PK displays similar performance with alternatives in terms of acceptable dose recommendations. The R and Stan code for the implementation of an illustrative sequential phase I trial example in oncology is publicly available (https://github.com/gunhanb/TITEPK_sequential). CONCLUSION: In phase I oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules, the use of all relevant information is of great importance. For these trials, the adapted TITE-PK which combines information using PK principles is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8045405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80454052021-04-14 Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules Günhan, Burak Kürsad Weber, Sebastian Seroutou, Abdelkader Friede, Tim BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Conventional methods for phase I dose-escalation trials in oncology are based on a single treatment schedule only. More recently, however, multiple schedules are more frequently investigated in the same trial. METHODS: Here, we consider sequential phase I trials, where the trial proceeds with a new schedule (e.g. daily or weekly dosing) once the dose escalation with another schedule has been completed. The aim is to utilize the information from both the completed and the ongoing schedules to inform decisions on the dose level for the next dose cohort. For this purpose, we adapted the time-to-event pharmacokinetics (TITE-PK) model, which were originally developed for simultaneous investigation of multiple schedules. TITE-PK integrates information from multiple schedules using a pharmacokinetics (PK) model. RESULTS: In a simulation study, the developed approach is compared to the bridging continual reassessment method and the Bayesian logistic regression model using a meta-analytic-predictive prior. TITE-PK results in better performance than comparators in terms of recommending acceptable dose and avoiding overly toxic doses for sequential phase I trials in most of the scenarios considered. Furthermore, better performance of TITE-PK is achieved while requiring similar number of patients in the simulated trials. For the scenarios involving one schedule, TITE-PK displays similar performance with alternatives in terms of acceptable dose recommendations. The R and Stan code for the implementation of an illustrative sequential phase I trial example in oncology is publicly available (https://github.com/gunhanb/TITEPK_sequential). CONCLUSION: In phase I oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules, the use of all relevant information is of great importance. For these trials, the adapted TITE-PK which combines information using PK principles is recommended. BioMed Central 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8045405/ /pubmed/33853539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01218-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Günhan, Burak Kürsad
Weber, Sebastian
Seroutou, Abdelkader
Friede, Tim
Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules
title Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules
title_full Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules
title_fullStr Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules
title_full_unstemmed Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules
title_short Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules
title_sort phase i dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33853539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01218-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gunhanburakkursad phaseidoseescalationoncologytrialswithsequentialmultipleschedules
AT webersebastian phaseidoseescalationoncologytrialswithsequentialmultipleschedules
AT seroutouabdelkader phaseidoseescalationoncologytrialswithsequentialmultipleschedules
AT friedetim phaseidoseescalationoncologytrialswithsequentialmultipleschedules