Cargando…
Leveraging electronic health records data to predict multiple sclerosis disease activity
OBJECTIVE: No relapse risk prediction tool is currently available to guide treatment selection for multiple sclerosis (MS). Leveraging electronic health record (EHR) data readily available at the point of care, we developed a clinical tool for predicting MS relapse risk. METHODS: Using data from a c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33626237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51324 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: No relapse risk prediction tool is currently available to guide treatment selection for multiple sclerosis (MS). Leveraging electronic health record (EHR) data readily available at the point of care, we developed a clinical tool for predicting MS relapse risk. METHODS: Using data from a clinic‐based research registry and linked EHR system between 2006 and 2016, we developed models predicting relapse events from the registry in a training set (n = 1435) and tested the model performance in an independent validation set of MS patients (n = 186). This iterative process identified prior 1‐year relapse history as a key predictor of future relapse but ascertaining relapse history through the labor‐intensive chart review is impractical. We pursued two‐stage algorithm development: (1) L(1)‐regularized logistic regression (LASSO) to phenotype past 1‐year relapse status from contemporaneous EHR data, (2) LASSO to predict future 1‐year relapse risk using imputed prior 1‐year relapse status and other algorithm‐selected features. RESULTS: The final model, comprising age, disease duration, and imputed prior 1‐year relapse history, achieved a predictive AUC and F score of 0.707 and 0.307, respectively. The performance was significantly better than the baseline model (age, sex, race/ethnicity, and disease duration) and noninferior to a model containing actual prior 1‐year relapse history. The predicted risk probability declined with disease duration and age. CONCLUSION: Our novel machine‐learning algorithm predicts 1‐year MS relapse with accuracy comparable to other clinical prediction tools and has applicability at the point of care. This EHR‐based two‐stage approach of outcome prediction may have application to neurological disease beyond MS. |
---|