Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to discuss the safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses (3 mg) of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐rhG‐CSF) at approximately 24 h or up to three days following treatment with etoposide and cisplatin (EP). METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13883 |
_version_ | 1783678772982054912 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Chang Hao, Ying Wang, Lei Meng, Fanlu Wen, Fuyu Zhong, Diansheng |
author_facet | Liu, Chang Hao, Ying Wang, Lei Meng, Fanlu Wen, Fuyu Zhong, Diansheng |
author_sort | Liu, Chang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to discuss the safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses (3 mg) of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐rhG‐CSF) at approximately 24 h or up to three days following treatment with etoposide and cisplatin (EP). METHODS: A total of 104 cycles from 31 patients were divided into a PEG‐rhG‐CSF prophylaxis group (PP‐Group) and a control group (No‐PP‐Group). The PP‐Group received a reduced dose of 3 mg of PEG‐rhG‐CSF within a minimum of 15 h and a maximum of 72 h following EP chemotherapy, while the rest did not receive any G‐CSF prophylaxis (No‐PP‐Group). For both groups, complete blood counts, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), grade III or IV neutropenia, and the use of antibiotics to treat neutropenia were recorded. RESULTS: There was statistically no significant difference in the incidence of FN (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 1), antibiotic use due to neutropenia (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.881), estimated lowest mean marginal (EM) platelet (106.56 × 10(9)/L vs. 127.70 × 10(9)/L, p = 0.056) and hemoglobin (110.48 g/L vs. 110.14 g/L, p = 0.906) levels between the two groups. However, when compared with the No‐PP‐group, the white blood cell count in the PP‐group was significantly higher (EM means: 4.95 × 10(9)/L vs. 2.80 × 10(9)/L, p < 0.01), while the incidence of grade III or IV neutropenia was significantly lower (9.1% vs. 68.1%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a low dose (3 mg) of PEG‐rhG‐CSF within approximately 24 h or up to three days following EP treatment is safe and effective at reducing the risk of neutropenia. These findings bring a more flexible administration interval between PEG‐rhG‐CSF and EP treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8046050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80460502021-04-16 Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study Liu, Chang Hao, Ying Wang, Lei Meng, Fanlu Wen, Fuyu Zhong, Diansheng Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to discuss the safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses (3 mg) of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐rhG‐CSF) at approximately 24 h or up to three days following treatment with etoposide and cisplatin (EP). METHODS: A total of 104 cycles from 31 patients were divided into a PEG‐rhG‐CSF prophylaxis group (PP‐Group) and a control group (No‐PP‐Group). The PP‐Group received a reduced dose of 3 mg of PEG‐rhG‐CSF within a minimum of 15 h and a maximum of 72 h following EP chemotherapy, while the rest did not receive any G‐CSF prophylaxis (No‐PP‐Group). For both groups, complete blood counts, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), grade III or IV neutropenia, and the use of antibiotics to treat neutropenia were recorded. RESULTS: There was statistically no significant difference in the incidence of FN (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 1), antibiotic use due to neutropenia (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.881), estimated lowest mean marginal (EM) platelet (106.56 × 10(9)/L vs. 127.70 × 10(9)/L, p = 0.056) and hemoglobin (110.48 g/L vs. 110.14 g/L, p = 0.906) levels between the two groups. However, when compared with the No‐PP‐group, the white blood cell count in the PP‐group was significantly higher (EM means: 4.95 × 10(9)/L vs. 2.80 × 10(9)/L, p < 0.01), while the incidence of grade III or IV neutropenia was significantly lower (9.1% vs. 68.1%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a low dose (3 mg) of PEG‐rhG‐CSF within approximately 24 h or up to three days following EP treatment is safe and effective at reducing the risk of neutropenia. These findings bring a more flexible administration interval between PEG‐rhG‐CSF and EP treatment. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-02-15 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8046050/ /pubmed/33590721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13883 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Liu, Chang Hao, Ying Wang, Lei Meng, Fanlu Wen, Fuyu Zhong, Diansheng Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title | Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: a retrospective study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuchang safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT haoying safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT wanglei safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT mengfanlu safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT wenfuyu safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy AT zhongdiansheng safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy |