Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to discuss the safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses (3 mg) of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐rhG‐CSF) at approximately 24 h or up to three days following treatment with etoposide and cisplatin (EP). METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chang, Hao, Ying, Wang, Lei, Meng, Fanlu, Wen, Fuyu, Zhong, Diansheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13883
_version_ 1783678772982054912
author Liu, Chang
Hao, Ying
Wang, Lei
Meng, Fanlu
Wen, Fuyu
Zhong, Diansheng
author_facet Liu, Chang
Hao, Ying
Wang, Lei
Meng, Fanlu
Wen, Fuyu
Zhong, Diansheng
author_sort Liu, Chang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to discuss the safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses (3 mg) of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐rhG‐CSF) at approximately 24 h or up to three days following treatment with etoposide and cisplatin (EP). METHODS: A total of 104 cycles from 31 patients were divided into a PEG‐rhG‐CSF prophylaxis group (PP‐Group) and a control group (No‐PP‐Group). The PP‐Group received a reduced dose of 3 mg of PEG‐rhG‐CSF within a minimum of 15 h and a maximum of 72 h following EP chemotherapy, while the rest did not receive any G‐CSF prophylaxis (No‐PP‐Group). For both groups, complete blood counts, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), grade III or IV neutropenia, and the use of antibiotics to treat neutropenia were recorded. RESULTS: There was statistically no significant difference in the incidence of FN (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 1), antibiotic use due to neutropenia (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.881), estimated lowest mean marginal (EM) platelet (106.56 × 10(9)/L vs. 127.70 × 10(9)/L, p = 0.056) and hemoglobin (110.48 g/L vs. 110.14 g/L, p = 0.906) levels between the two groups. However, when compared with the No‐PP‐group, the white blood cell count in the PP‐group was significantly higher (EM means: 4.95 × 10(9)/L vs. 2.80 × 10(9)/L, p < 0.01), while the incidence of grade III or IV neutropenia was significantly lower (9.1% vs. 68.1%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a low dose (3 mg) of PEG‐rhG‐CSF within approximately 24 h or up to three days following EP treatment is safe and effective at reducing the risk of neutropenia. These findings bring a more flexible administration interval between PEG‐rhG‐CSF and EP treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8046050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80460502021-04-16 Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study Liu, Chang Hao, Ying Wang, Lei Meng, Fanlu Wen, Fuyu Zhong, Diansheng Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to discuss the safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses (3 mg) of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐rhG‐CSF) at approximately 24 h or up to three days following treatment with etoposide and cisplatin (EP). METHODS: A total of 104 cycles from 31 patients were divided into a PEG‐rhG‐CSF prophylaxis group (PP‐Group) and a control group (No‐PP‐Group). The PP‐Group received a reduced dose of 3 mg of PEG‐rhG‐CSF within a minimum of 15 h and a maximum of 72 h following EP chemotherapy, while the rest did not receive any G‐CSF prophylaxis (No‐PP‐Group). For both groups, complete blood counts, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), grade III or IV neutropenia, and the use of antibiotics to treat neutropenia were recorded. RESULTS: There was statistically no significant difference in the incidence of FN (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 1), antibiotic use due to neutropenia (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.881), estimated lowest mean marginal (EM) platelet (106.56 × 10(9)/L vs. 127.70 × 10(9)/L, p = 0.056) and hemoglobin (110.48 g/L vs. 110.14 g/L, p = 0.906) levels between the two groups. However, when compared with the No‐PP‐group, the white blood cell count in the PP‐group was significantly higher (EM means: 4.95 × 10(9)/L vs. 2.80 × 10(9)/L, p < 0.01), while the incidence of grade III or IV neutropenia was significantly lower (9.1% vs. 68.1%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a low dose (3 mg) of PEG‐rhG‐CSF within approximately 24 h or up to three days following EP treatment is safe and effective at reducing the risk of neutropenia. These findings bring a more flexible administration interval between PEG‐rhG‐CSF and EP treatment. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-02-15 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8046050/ /pubmed/33590721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13883 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Liu, Chang
Hao, Ying
Wang, Lei
Meng, Fanlu
Wen, Fuyu
Zhong, Diansheng
Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
title Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
title_full Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
title_short Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study
title_sort safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte‐colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: a retrospective study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13883
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchang safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy
AT haoying safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy
AT wanglei safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy
AT mengfanlu safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy
AT wenfuyu safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy
AT zhongdiansheng safetyandefficacyofadministeringreduceddosesofpegylatedrecombinanthumangranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsinpatientstreatedwithcisplatinandetoposideforsmallcellcarcinomaaretrospectivestudy