Cargando…
Harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a promising advance in the treatment of patients with lung cancer. However, each ICI has been tested with an independently designed companion diagnostic assay that is based on a unique antibody. Consequently, the different trial‐validated programme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33650770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13893 |
_version_ | 1783678776433967104 |
---|---|
author | Matsuo, Tsubasa Imai, Kazuhiro Nanjo, Hiroshi Takashima, Shinogu Hiroshima, Yuko Atari, Maiko Kuriyama, Shoji Ishii, Yoshiaki Wakamatsu, Yuki Sato, Yusuke Motoyama, Satoru Matsumura, Yuki Suzuki, Hiroyuki Nomura, Kyoko Minamiya, Yoshihiro |
author_facet | Matsuo, Tsubasa Imai, Kazuhiro Nanjo, Hiroshi Takashima, Shinogu Hiroshima, Yuko Atari, Maiko Kuriyama, Shoji Ishii, Yoshiaki Wakamatsu, Yuki Sato, Yusuke Motoyama, Satoru Matsumura, Yuki Suzuki, Hiroyuki Nomura, Kyoko Minamiya, Yoshihiro |
author_sort | Matsuo, Tsubasa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a promising advance in the treatment of patients with lung cancer. However, each ICI has been tested with an independently designed companion diagnostic assay that is based on a unique antibody. Consequently, the different trial‐validated programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays should not be considered interchangeable. Our aim was to compare the performance of each available PD‐L1 antibody for its ability to accurately measure PD‐L1 expression and to investigate the possibility of harmonization across antibodies through the use of a new rapid IHC system, which uses noncontact alternating current (AC) mixing to achieve more stable staining. METHODS: First, 58 resected non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens were stained using three PD‐L1 IHC assays (28–8, SP142, and SP263) to assess the harmonization achieved with AC mixing IHC. Second, specimens from 27 patients receiving ICIs for postoperative recurrent NSCLC were stained using the same IHC method to compare the clinical performance of ICIs to PD‐L1 scores. All patients received a tumor proportion score (TPS) with the 22C3 companion diagnostic test. RESULTS: Better staining was achieved with the new AC mixing IHC method than the conventional IHC in PD‐L1‐positive cases, and the interchangeability of some combinations of assays was increased in PD‐L1‐positive. In addition, AC mixing IHC provided more appropriate overall response rates for ICIs in all assays. CONCLUSIONS: Stable PD‐L1 IHC driven by AC mixing helped to improve TPS scoring and patient selection for ICIs through interchangeable assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8046066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80460662021-04-16 Harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing Matsuo, Tsubasa Imai, Kazuhiro Nanjo, Hiroshi Takashima, Shinogu Hiroshima, Yuko Atari, Maiko Kuriyama, Shoji Ishii, Yoshiaki Wakamatsu, Yuki Sato, Yusuke Motoyama, Satoru Matsumura, Yuki Suzuki, Hiroyuki Nomura, Kyoko Minamiya, Yoshihiro Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a promising advance in the treatment of patients with lung cancer. However, each ICI has been tested with an independently designed companion diagnostic assay that is based on a unique antibody. Consequently, the different trial‐validated programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays should not be considered interchangeable. Our aim was to compare the performance of each available PD‐L1 antibody for its ability to accurately measure PD‐L1 expression and to investigate the possibility of harmonization across antibodies through the use of a new rapid IHC system, which uses noncontact alternating current (AC) mixing to achieve more stable staining. METHODS: First, 58 resected non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specimens were stained using three PD‐L1 IHC assays (28–8, SP142, and SP263) to assess the harmonization achieved with AC mixing IHC. Second, specimens from 27 patients receiving ICIs for postoperative recurrent NSCLC were stained using the same IHC method to compare the clinical performance of ICIs to PD‐L1 scores. All patients received a tumor proportion score (TPS) with the 22C3 companion diagnostic test. RESULTS: Better staining was achieved with the new AC mixing IHC method than the conventional IHC in PD‐L1‐positive cases, and the interchangeability of some combinations of assays was increased in PD‐L1‐positive. In addition, AC mixing IHC provided more appropriate overall response rates for ICIs in all assays. CONCLUSIONS: Stable PD‐L1 IHC driven by AC mixing helped to improve TPS scoring and patient selection for ICIs through interchangeable assays. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-02 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8046066/ /pubmed/33650770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13893 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Matsuo, Tsubasa Imai, Kazuhiro Nanjo, Hiroshi Takashima, Shinogu Hiroshima, Yuko Atari, Maiko Kuriyama, Shoji Ishii, Yoshiaki Wakamatsu, Yuki Sato, Yusuke Motoyama, Satoru Matsumura, Yuki Suzuki, Hiroyuki Nomura, Kyoko Minamiya, Yoshihiro Harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing |
title | Harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing |
title_full | Harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing |
title_fullStr | Harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing |
title_full_unstemmed | Harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing |
title_short | Harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing |
title_sort | harmonization across programmed death ligand 1 (pd‐l1) assays for lung cancer by immunohistochemistry using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33650770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13893 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsuotsubasa harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT imaikazuhiro harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT nanjohiroshi harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT takashimashinogu harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT hiroshimayuko harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT atarimaiko harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT kuriyamashoji harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT ishiiyoshiaki harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT wakamatsuyuki harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT satoyusuke harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT motoyamasatoru harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT matsumurayuki harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT suzukihiroyuki harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT nomurakyoko harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing AT minamiyayoshihiro harmonizationacrossprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1assaysforlungcancerbyimmunohistochemistryusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing |