Cargando…
Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017)
AIM: To provide a systematic review of the literature from 1997 to 2017 on nursing‐sensitive indicators. DESIGN: A qualitative design with a deductive approach was used. DATA SOURCES: Original and Grey Literature references from Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL, Google Scholar Or...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34482649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.654 |
_version_ | 1783678780866297856 |
---|---|
author | Oner, Beratiye Zengul, Ferhat D. Oner, Nurettin Ivankova, Nataliya V. Karadag, Ayise Patrician, Patricia A. |
author_facet | Oner, Beratiye Zengul, Ferhat D. Oner, Nurettin Ivankova, Nataliya V. Karadag, Ayise Patrician, Patricia A. |
author_sort | Oner, Beratiye |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To provide a systematic review of the literature from 1997 to 2017 on nursing‐sensitive indicators. DESIGN: A qualitative design with a deductive approach was used. DATA SOURCES: Original and Grey Literature references from Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL, Google Scholar Original and Grey Literature. REVIEW METHODS: Quality assessment was performed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross‐Sectional Studies. RESULTS: A total of 3,633 articles were identified, and thirty‐nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The quantitative assessment of investigated relationships in these studies suggests that nursing staffing, mortality, and nosocomial infections were the most frequently reported nursing‐sensitive indicators. CONCLUSION: This review provides a comprehensive list of nursing‐sensitive indicators, their frequency of use, and the associations between these indicators and various outcome variables. Stakeholders of nursing research may use the findings to streamline the indicator development efforts and standardization of nursing‐sensitive indicators. IMPACT: This review provides evidence‐based results that health organizations can benefit from nursing care quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8046086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80460862021-04-16 Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017) Oner, Beratiye Zengul, Ferhat D. Oner, Nurettin Ivankova, Nataliya V. Karadag, Ayise Patrician, Patricia A. Nurs Open Review Article AIM: To provide a systematic review of the literature from 1997 to 2017 on nursing‐sensitive indicators. DESIGN: A qualitative design with a deductive approach was used. DATA SOURCES: Original and Grey Literature references from Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL, Google Scholar Original and Grey Literature. REVIEW METHODS: Quality assessment was performed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross‐Sectional Studies. RESULTS: A total of 3,633 articles were identified, and thirty‐nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The quantitative assessment of investigated relationships in these studies suggests that nursing staffing, mortality, and nosocomial infections were the most frequently reported nursing‐sensitive indicators. CONCLUSION: This review provides a comprehensive list of nursing‐sensitive indicators, their frequency of use, and the associations between these indicators and various outcome variables. Stakeholders of nursing research may use the findings to streamline the indicator development efforts and standardization of nursing‐sensitive indicators. IMPACT: This review provides evidence‐based results that health organizations can benefit from nursing care quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8046086/ /pubmed/34482649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.654 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Oner, Beratiye Zengul, Ferhat D. Oner, Nurettin Ivankova, Nataliya V. Karadag, Ayise Patrician, Patricia A. Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017) |
title | Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017) |
title_full | Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017) |
title_fullStr | Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017) |
title_full_unstemmed | Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017) |
title_short | Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017) |
title_sort | nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: a systematic review (1997–2017) |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34482649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.654 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onerberatiye nursingsensitiveindicatorsfornursingcareasystematicreview19972017 AT zengulferhatd nursingsensitiveindicatorsfornursingcareasystematicreview19972017 AT onernurettin nursingsensitiveindicatorsfornursingcareasystematicreview19972017 AT ivankovanataliyav nursingsensitiveindicatorsfornursingcareasystematicreview19972017 AT karadagayise nursingsensitiveindicatorsfornursingcareasystematicreview19972017 AT patricianpatriciaa nursingsensitiveindicatorsfornursingcareasystematicreview19972017 |