Cargando…

Cross‐Sectional Imaging Useful in Melorheostosis

Melorheostosis is a rare disease of bone overgrowth that is primarily diagnosed based on imaging studies. Recently, the association of different radiological patterns of the disease with distinct genetic cause was reported. Several case reports have described the radiological findings in patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurley‐Novatny, Amelia, Karantanas, Apostolos H, Papadakis, Georgios Z, Bhattacharyya, Timothy, Jha, Smita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10472
_version_ 1783678793451307008
author Hurley‐Novatny, Amelia
Karantanas, Apostolos H
Papadakis, Georgios Z
Bhattacharyya, Timothy
Jha, Smita
author_facet Hurley‐Novatny, Amelia
Karantanas, Apostolos H
Papadakis, Georgios Z
Bhattacharyya, Timothy
Jha, Smita
author_sort Hurley‐Novatny, Amelia
collection PubMed
description Melorheostosis is a rare disease of bone overgrowth that is primarily diagnosed based on imaging studies. Recently, the association of different radiological patterns of the disease with distinct genetic cause was reported. Several case reports have described the radiological findings in patients with melorheostosis. However, the added value of cross‐sectional imaging with CT and MRI beyond X‐rays has not been investigated. The aim of the current study was to investigate this existing gap in knowledge. Forty patients with melorheostosis seen at the National Institute of Health Clinical Center were included in the study, and all their imaging studies were analyzed. The sequence of interpretation was X‐ray followed by CT and then MRI. CT images were extracted from whole‐body 18F‐sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/CT studies. The information from CT reclassified the initial X‐rays based radiological pattern in 13 patients. Additionally, CT comprehensively identified joint involvement and disease extent. In 76% of patients (n = 29) who underwent MRI, additional findings were noted, ranging from soft tissue edema to identification of soft tissue masses and incidental findings. MRI did not provide additional information on skeletal lesions beyond CT scans. However, it revealed the extension of soft tissue ossification into ischiofemoral space in four patients who complained of deep gluteal pain consistent with ischiofemoral impingement syndrome. In addition, MRI revealed soft tissue edema in 20 patients, 9 of whom had bone marrow edema and periosteal edema in the tibias consistent with shin splints. These findings suggest that select patients with melorheostosis should be evaluated with both CT and MRI, particularly patients in whom the distribution of pain does not correlate with the anatomic location of the disease in plain radiographs. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8046147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80461472021-04-16 Cross‐Sectional Imaging Useful in Melorheostosis Hurley‐Novatny, Amelia Karantanas, Apostolos H Papadakis, Georgios Z Bhattacharyya, Timothy Jha, Smita JBMR Plus Original Articles Melorheostosis is a rare disease of bone overgrowth that is primarily diagnosed based on imaging studies. Recently, the association of different radiological patterns of the disease with distinct genetic cause was reported. Several case reports have described the radiological findings in patients with melorheostosis. However, the added value of cross‐sectional imaging with CT and MRI beyond X‐rays has not been investigated. The aim of the current study was to investigate this existing gap in knowledge. Forty patients with melorheostosis seen at the National Institute of Health Clinical Center were included in the study, and all their imaging studies were analyzed. The sequence of interpretation was X‐ray followed by CT and then MRI. CT images were extracted from whole‐body 18F‐sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/CT studies. The information from CT reclassified the initial X‐rays based radiological pattern in 13 patients. Additionally, CT comprehensively identified joint involvement and disease extent. In 76% of patients (n = 29) who underwent MRI, additional findings were noted, ranging from soft tissue edema to identification of soft tissue masses and incidental findings. MRI did not provide additional information on skeletal lesions beyond CT scans. However, it revealed the extension of soft tissue ossification into ischiofemoral space in four patients who complained of deep gluteal pain consistent with ischiofemoral impingement syndrome. In addition, MRI revealed soft tissue edema in 20 patients, 9 of whom had bone marrow edema and periosteal edema in the tibias consistent with shin splints. These findings suggest that select patients with melorheostosis should be evaluated with both CT and MRI, particularly patients in whom the distribution of pain does not correlate with the anatomic location of the disease in plain radiographs. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8046147/ /pubmed/33869990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10472 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hurley‐Novatny, Amelia
Karantanas, Apostolos H
Papadakis, Georgios Z
Bhattacharyya, Timothy
Jha, Smita
Cross‐Sectional Imaging Useful in Melorheostosis
title Cross‐Sectional Imaging Useful in Melorheostosis
title_full Cross‐Sectional Imaging Useful in Melorheostosis
title_fullStr Cross‐Sectional Imaging Useful in Melorheostosis
title_full_unstemmed Cross‐Sectional Imaging Useful in Melorheostosis
title_short Cross‐Sectional Imaging Useful in Melorheostosis
title_sort cross‐sectional imaging useful in melorheostosis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10472
work_keys_str_mv AT hurleynovatnyamelia crosssectionalimagingusefulinmelorheostosis
AT karantanasapostolosh crosssectionalimagingusefulinmelorheostosis
AT papadakisgeorgiosz crosssectionalimagingusefulinmelorheostosis
AT bhattacharyyatimothy crosssectionalimagingusefulinmelorheostosis
AT jhasmita crosssectionalimagingusefulinmelorheostosis