Cargando…

Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training

When searching for a known target, mental representations of target features, or templates, guide attention towards matching objects and facilitate recognition. When only distractor features are known, distractor templates allow irrelevant objects to be recognised and attention to be shifted away. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muhl-Richardson, Alex, Parker, Maximilian G., Recio, Sergio A., Tortosa-Molina, Maria, Daffron, Jennifer L., Davis, Greg J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00295-0
_version_ 1783678928108388352
author Muhl-Richardson, Alex
Parker, Maximilian G.
Recio, Sergio A.
Tortosa-Molina, Maria
Daffron, Jennifer L.
Davis, Greg J.
author_facet Muhl-Richardson, Alex
Parker, Maximilian G.
Recio, Sergio A.
Tortosa-Molina, Maria
Daffron, Jennifer L.
Davis, Greg J.
author_sort Muhl-Richardson, Alex
collection PubMed
description When searching for a known target, mental representations of target features, or templates, guide attention towards matching objects and facilitate recognition. When only distractor features are known, distractor templates allow irrelevant objects to be recognised and attention to be shifted away. This is particularly true in X-ray baggage search, a challenging real-world visual search task with implications for public safety, where targets may be unknown, difficult to predict and concealed by an adversary, but distractors are typically benign and easier to identify. In the present study, we draw on basic principles of distractor suppression and rejection to investigate a counterintuitive ‘targetless’ approach to training baggage search. In a simulated X-ray baggage search task, we observed significant benefits to target detection sensitivity (d′) for targetless relative to target-based training, but no effects of performance-contingent rewards or the inclusion of superordinate semantic categories during training. The benefits of targetless search training were most apparent for stimuli involving less spatial overlap (occlusion), which likely represents the difficulty and greater individual variation involved in searching more visually complex images. Together, these results demonstrate the effectiveness of a counterintuitive targetless approach to training target detection in X-ray baggage search, based on basic principles of distractor suppression and rejection, with potential for use as a real-world training tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41235-021-00295-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8046861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80468612021-04-27 Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training Muhl-Richardson, Alex Parker, Maximilian G. Recio, Sergio A. Tortosa-Molina, Maria Daffron, Jennifer L. Davis, Greg J. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article When searching for a known target, mental representations of target features, or templates, guide attention towards matching objects and facilitate recognition. When only distractor features are known, distractor templates allow irrelevant objects to be recognised and attention to be shifted away. This is particularly true in X-ray baggage search, a challenging real-world visual search task with implications for public safety, where targets may be unknown, difficult to predict and concealed by an adversary, but distractors are typically benign and easier to identify. In the present study, we draw on basic principles of distractor suppression and rejection to investigate a counterintuitive ‘targetless’ approach to training baggage search. In a simulated X-ray baggage search task, we observed significant benefits to target detection sensitivity (d′) for targetless relative to target-based training, but no effects of performance-contingent rewards or the inclusion of superordinate semantic categories during training. The benefits of targetless search training were most apparent for stimuli involving less spatial overlap (occlusion), which likely represents the difficulty and greater individual variation involved in searching more visually complex images. Together, these results demonstrate the effectiveness of a counterintuitive targetless approach to training target detection in X-ray baggage search, based on basic principles of distractor suppression and rejection, with potential for use as a real-world training tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41235-021-00295-0. Springer International Publishing 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8046861/ /pubmed/33855667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00295-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Muhl-Richardson, Alex
Parker, Maximilian G.
Recio, Sergio A.
Tortosa-Molina, Maria
Daffron, Jennifer L.
Davis, Greg J.
Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training
title Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training
title_full Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training
title_fullStr Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training
title_full_unstemmed Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training
title_short Improved X-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training
title_sort improved x-ray baggage screening sensitivity with ‘targetless’ search training
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00295-0
work_keys_str_mv AT muhlrichardsonalex improvedxraybaggagescreeningsensitivitywithtargetlesssearchtraining
AT parkermaximiliang improvedxraybaggagescreeningsensitivitywithtargetlesssearchtraining
AT reciosergioa improvedxraybaggagescreeningsensitivitywithtargetlesssearchtraining
AT tortosamolinamaria improvedxraybaggagescreeningsensitivitywithtargetlesssearchtraining
AT daffronjenniferl improvedxraybaggagescreeningsensitivitywithtargetlesssearchtraining
AT davisgregj improvedxraybaggagescreeningsensitivitywithtargetlesssearchtraining