Cargando…

Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among crop wild relatives is an important task in crop improvement. The main objective of the current study was to estimate molecular variability within the set of 91 samples from Triticum aestivum, Aegilops cylindrica, and Aegilops crass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghobadi, Ghazal, Etminan, Alireza, Mehrabi, Ali Mehras, Shooshtari, Lia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00157-8
_version_ 1783678928341172224
author Ghobadi, Ghazal
Etminan, Alireza
Mehrabi, Ali Mehras
Shooshtari, Lia
author_facet Ghobadi, Ghazal
Etminan, Alireza
Mehrabi, Ali Mehras
Shooshtari, Lia
author_sort Ghobadi, Ghazal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among crop wild relatives is an important task in crop improvement. The main objective of the current study was to estimate molecular variability within the set of 91 samples from Triticum aestivum, Aegilops cylindrica, and Aegilops crassa species using 30 CAAT box–derived polymorphism (CBDP) and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. RESULTS: Fifteen SCoT and Fifteen CBDP primers produced 262 and 298 fragments which all of them were polymorphic, respectively. The number of polymorphic bands (NPB), polymorphic information content (PIC), resolving power (Rp), and marker index (MI) for SCoT primers ranged from 14 to 23, 0.31 to 0.39, 2.55 to 7.49, and 7.56 to 14.46 with an average of 17.47, 0.34, 10.44, and 5.69, respectively, whereas these values for CBDP primers were 15 to 26, 0.28 to 0.36, 3.82 to 6.94, and 4.74 to 7.96 with a mean of 19.87, 0.31, 5.35, and 6.24, respectively. Based on both marker systems, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that the portion of genetic diversity within species was more than among them. In both analyses, the highest values of the number of observed (Na) and effective alleles (Ne), Nei’s gene diversity (He), and Shannon’s information index (I) were estimated for Ae. cylindrica species. CONCLUSION: The results of cluster analysis and population structure showed that SCoT and CBDP markers grouped all samples based on their genomic constitutions. In conclusion, the used markers are very effective techniques for the evaluation of the genetic diversity in wild relatives of wheat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8046865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80468652021-04-16 Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers Ghobadi, Ghazal Etminan, Alireza Mehrabi, Ali Mehras Shooshtari, Lia J Genet Eng Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among crop wild relatives is an important task in crop improvement. The main objective of the current study was to estimate molecular variability within the set of 91 samples from Triticum aestivum, Aegilops cylindrica, and Aegilops crassa species using 30 CAAT box–derived polymorphism (CBDP) and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. RESULTS: Fifteen SCoT and Fifteen CBDP primers produced 262 and 298 fragments which all of them were polymorphic, respectively. The number of polymorphic bands (NPB), polymorphic information content (PIC), resolving power (Rp), and marker index (MI) for SCoT primers ranged from 14 to 23, 0.31 to 0.39, 2.55 to 7.49, and 7.56 to 14.46 with an average of 17.47, 0.34, 10.44, and 5.69, respectively, whereas these values for CBDP primers were 15 to 26, 0.28 to 0.36, 3.82 to 6.94, and 4.74 to 7.96 with a mean of 19.87, 0.31, 5.35, and 6.24, respectively. Based on both marker systems, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that the portion of genetic diversity within species was more than among them. In both analyses, the highest values of the number of observed (Na) and effective alleles (Ne), Nei’s gene diversity (He), and Shannon’s information index (I) were estimated for Ae. cylindrica species. CONCLUSION: The results of cluster analysis and population structure showed that SCoT and CBDP markers grouped all samples based on their genomic constitutions. In conclusion, the used markers are very effective techniques for the evaluation of the genetic diversity in wild relatives of wheat. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8046865/ /pubmed/33852105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00157-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Ghobadi, Ghazal
Etminan, Alireza
Mehrabi, Ali Mehras
Shooshtari, Lia
Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers
title Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers
title_full Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers
title_fullStr Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers
title_full_unstemmed Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers
title_short Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers
title_sort molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (triticum aestivum l.) and two aegilops species (aegilops crassa and aegilops cylindrica) using cbdp and scot markers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00157-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ghobadighazal moleculardiversityanalysisinhexaploidwheattriticumaestivumlandtwoaegilopsspeciesaegilopscrassaandaegilopscylindricausingcbdpandscotmarkers
AT etminanalireza moleculardiversityanalysisinhexaploidwheattriticumaestivumlandtwoaegilopsspeciesaegilopscrassaandaegilopscylindricausingcbdpandscotmarkers
AT mehrabialimehras moleculardiversityanalysisinhexaploidwheattriticumaestivumlandtwoaegilopsspeciesaegilopscrassaandaegilopscylindricausingcbdpandscotmarkers
AT shooshtarilia moleculardiversityanalysisinhexaploidwheattriticumaestivumlandtwoaegilopsspeciesaegilopscrassaandaegilopscylindricausingcbdpandscotmarkers