Cargando…
Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among crop wild relatives is an important task in crop improvement. The main objective of the current study was to estimate molecular variability within the set of 91 samples from Triticum aestivum, Aegilops cylindrica, and Aegilops crass...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00157-8 |
_version_ | 1783678928341172224 |
---|---|
author | Ghobadi, Ghazal Etminan, Alireza Mehrabi, Ali Mehras Shooshtari, Lia |
author_facet | Ghobadi, Ghazal Etminan, Alireza Mehrabi, Ali Mehras Shooshtari, Lia |
author_sort | Ghobadi, Ghazal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among crop wild relatives is an important task in crop improvement. The main objective of the current study was to estimate molecular variability within the set of 91 samples from Triticum aestivum, Aegilops cylindrica, and Aegilops crassa species using 30 CAAT box–derived polymorphism (CBDP) and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. RESULTS: Fifteen SCoT and Fifteen CBDP primers produced 262 and 298 fragments which all of them were polymorphic, respectively. The number of polymorphic bands (NPB), polymorphic information content (PIC), resolving power (Rp), and marker index (MI) for SCoT primers ranged from 14 to 23, 0.31 to 0.39, 2.55 to 7.49, and 7.56 to 14.46 with an average of 17.47, 0.34, 10.44, and 5.69, respectively, whereas these values for CBDP primers were 15 to 26, 0.28 to 0.36, 3.82 to 6.94, and 4.74 to 7.96 with a mean of 19.87, 0.31, 5.35, and 6.24, respectively. Based on both marker systems, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that the portion of genetic diversity within species was more than among them. In both analyses, the highest values of the number of observed (Na) and effective alleles (Ne), Nei’s gene diversity (He), and Shannon’s information index (I) were estimated for Ae. cylindrica species. CONCLUSION: The results of cluster analysis and population structure showed that SCoT and CBDP markers grouped all samples based on their genomic constitutions. In conclusion, the used markers are very effective techniques for the evaluation of the genetic diversity in wild relatives of wheat. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8046865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80468652021-04-16 Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers Ghobadi, Ghazal Etminan, Alireza Mehrabi, Ali Mehras Shooshtari, Lia J Genet Eng Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationships among crop wild relatives is an important task in crop improvement. The main objective of the current study was to estimate molecular variability within the set of 91 samples from Triticum aestivum, Aegilops cylindrica, and Aegilops crassa species using 30 CAAT box–derived polymorphism (CBDP) and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. RESULTS: Fifteen SCoT and Fifteen CBDP primers produced 262 and 298 fragments which all of them were polymorphic, respectively. The number of polymorphic bands (NPB), polymorphic information content (PIC), resolving power (Rp), and marker index (MI) for SCoT primers ranged from 14 to 23, 0.31 to 0.39, 2.55 to 7.49, and 7.56 to 14.46 with an average of 17.47, 0.34, 10.44, and 5.69, respectively, whereas these values for CBDP primers were 15 to 26, 0.28 to 0.36, 3.82 to 6.94, and 4.74 to 7.96 with a mean of 19.87, 0.31, 5.35, and 6.24, respectively. Based on both marker systems, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that the portion of genetic diversity within species was more than among them. In both analyses, the highest values of the number of observed (Na) and effective alleles (Ne), Nei’s gene diversity (He), and Shannon’s information index (I) were estimated for Ae. cylindrica species. CONCLUSION: The results of cluster analysis and population structure showed that SCoT and CBDP markers grouped all samples based on their genomic constitutions. In conclusion, the used markers are very effective techniques for the evaluation of the genetic diversity in wild relatives of wheat. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8046865/ /pubmed/33852105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00157-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Ghobadi, Ghazal Etminan, Alireza Mehrabi, Ali Mehras Shooshtari, Lia Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers |
title | Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers |
title_full | Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers |
title_fullStr | Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers |
title_short | Molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and two Aegilops species (Aegilops crassa and Aegilops cylindrica) using CBDP and SCoT markers |
title_sort | molecular diversity analysis in hexaploid wheat (triticum aestivum l.) and two aegilops species (aegilops crassa and aegilops cylindrica) using cbdp and scot markers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00157-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghobadighazal moleculardiversityanalysisinhexaploidwheattriticumaestivumlandtwoaegilopsspeciesaegilopscrassaandaegilopscylindricausingcbdpandscotmarkers AT etminanalireza moleculardiversityanalysisinhexaploidwheattriticumaestivumlandtwoaegilopsspeciesaegilopscrassaandaegilopscylindricausingcbdpandscotmarkers AT mehrabialimehras moleculardiversityanalysisinhexaploidwheattriticumaestivumlandtwoaegilopsspeciesaegilopscrassaandaegilopscylindricausingcbdpandscotmarkers AT shooshtarilia moleculardiversityanalysisinhexaploidwheattriticumaestivumlandtwoaegilopsspeciesaegilopscrassaandaegilopscylindricausingcbdpandscotmarkers |