Cargando…

Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have systematically developed predictive models for clinical evaluation of the malignancy risk of solid breast nodules. We performed a retrospective review of female patients who underwent breast surgery or puncture, aiming to establish a predictive model for evaluating the cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Bin, Hu, Qiaohong, He, Hongfeng, Liu, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211004681
_version_ 1783678973259022336
author Dong, Bin
Hu, Qiaohong
He, Hongfeng
Liu, Ying
author_facet Dong, Bin
Hu, Qiaohong
He, Hongfeng
Liu, Ying
author_sort Dong, Bin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Few studies have systematically developed predictive models for clinical evaluation of the malignancy risk of solid breast nodules. We performed a retrospective review of female patients who underwent breast surgery or puncture, aiming to establish a predictive model for evaluating the clinical malignancy risk of solid breast nodules. METHOD: Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent variables and establish a predictive model based on a model group (207 nodules). The regression model was further validated using a validation group (112 nodules). RESULTS: We identified six independent risk factors (X(3), boundary; X(4), margin; X(6), resistive index; X(7), S/L ratio; X(9), increase of maximum sectional area; and X(14), microcalcification) using multivariate analysis. The combined predictive formula for our model was: Z=−5.937 + 1.435X(3) + 1.820X(4) + 1.760X(6) + 2.312X(7) + 3.018X(9) + 2.494X(14). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, missed diagnosis rate, misdiagnosis rate, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio of the model were 88.39%, 90.00%, 87.80%, 10.00%, 12.20%, 7.38, and 0.11, respectively. CONCLUSION: This predictive model is simple, practical, and effective for evaluation of the malignancy risk of solid breast nodules in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8047088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80470882021-04-27 Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules Dong, Bin Hu, Qiaohong He, Hongfeng Liu, Ying J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Few studies have systematically developed predictive models for clinical evaluation of the malignancy risk of solid breast nodules. We performed a retrospective review of female patients who underwent breast surgery or puncture, aiming to establish a predictive model for evaluating the clinical malignancy risk of solid breast nodules. METHOD: Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent variables and establish a predictive model based on a model group (207 nodules). The regression model was further validated using a validation group (112 nodules). RESULTS: We identified six independent risk factors (X(3), boundary; X(4), margin; X(6), resistive index; X(7), S/L ratio; X(9), increase of maximum sectional area; and X(14), microcalcification) using multivariate analysis. The combined predictive formula for our model was: Z=−5.937 + 1.435X(3) + 1.820X(4) + 1.760X(6) + 2.312X(7) + 3.018X(9) + 2.494X(14). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, missed diagnosis rate, misdiagnosis rate, negative likelihood ratio, and positive likelihood ratio of the model were 88.39%, 90.00%, 87.80%, 10.00%, 12.20%, 7.38, and 0.11, respectively. CONCLUSION: This predictive model is simple, practical, and effective for evaluation of the malignancy risk of solid breast nodules in clinical settings. SAGE Publications 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8047088/ /pubmed/33845599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211004681 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Dong, Bin
Hu, Qiaohong
He, Hongfeng
Liu, Ying
Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules
title Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules
title_full Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules
title_fullStr Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules
title_full_unstemmed Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules
title_short Prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules
title_sort prediction model that combines with multidisciplinary analysis for clinical evaluation of malignancy risk of solid breast nodules
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211004681
work_keys_str_mv AT dongbin predictionmodelthatcombineswithmultidisciplinaryanalysisforclinicalevaluationofmalignancyriskofsolidbreastnodules
AT huqiaohong predictionmodelthatcombineswithmultidisciplinaryanalysisforclinicalevaluationofmalignancyriskofsolidbreastnodules
AT hehongfeng predictionmodelthatcombineswithmultidisciplinaryanalysisforclinicalevaluationofmalignancyriskofsolidbreastnodules
AT liuying predictionmodelthatcombineswithmultidisciplinaryanalysisforclinicalevaluationofmalignancyriskofsolidbreastnodules