Cargando…

Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis

BACKGROUND: Biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures are common early anastomotic biliary complications (EABCs) following liver transplantation. However, there are no large multicentre studies investigating their clinical impact or risk factors. This study aimed to define the incidence, risk factors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tingle, S J, Thompson, E R, Ali, S S, Figueiredo, R, Hudson, M, Sen, G, White, S A, Manas, D M, Wilson, C H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab019
_version_ 1783678975118147584
author Tingle, S J
Thompson, E R
Ali, S S
Figueiredo, R
Hudson, M
Sen, G
White, S A
Manas, D M
Wilson, C H
author_facet Tingle, S J
Thompson, E R
Ali, S S
Figueiredo, R
Hudson, M
Sen, G
White, S A
Manas, D M
Wilson, C H
author_sort Tingle, S J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures are common early anastomotic biliary complications (EABCs) following liver transplantation. However, there are no large multicentre studies investigating their clinical impact or risk factors. This study aimed to define the incidence, risk factors and impact of EABC. METHODS: The NHS registry on adult liver transplantation between 2006 and 2017 was reviewed retrospectively. Adjusted regression models were used to assess predictors of EABC, and their impact on outcomes. RESULTS: Analyses included 8304 liver transplant recipients. Patients with EABC (9·6 per cent) had prolonged hospitalization (23 versus 15 days; P < 0·001) and increased chance for readmission within the first year (56 versus 32 per cent; P < 0·001). Patients with EABC had decreased estimated 5-year graft survival of 75·1 versus 84·5 per cent in those without EABC, and decreased 5-year patient survival of 76·9 versus 83·3 per cent; both P < 0.001. Adjusted Cox regression revealed that EABCs have a significant and independent impact on graft survival (leak hazard ratio (HR) 1·344, P = 0·015; stricture HR 1·513, P = 0·002; leak plus stricture HR 1·526, P = 0·036) and patient survival (leak HR 1·215, P = 0·136, stricture HR 1·526, P = 0·001; leak plus stricture HR 1·509; P = 0·043). On adjusted logistic regression, risk factors for EABC included donation after circulatory death grafts, graft aberrant arterial anatomy, biliary anastomosis type, vascular anastomosis time and recipient model of end-stage liver disease. CONCLUSION: EABCs prolong hospital stay, increase readmission rates and are independent risk factors for graft loss and increased mortality. This study has identified factors that increase the likelihood of EABC occurrence; research into interventions to prevent EABCs in these at-risk groups is vital to improve liver transplantation outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8047096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80470962021-04-20 Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis Tingle, S J Thompson, E R Ali, S S Figueiredo, R Hudson, M Sen, G White, S A Manas, D M Wilson, C H BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures are common early anastomotic biliary complications (EABCs) following liver transplantation. However, there are no large multicentre studies investigating their clinical impact or risk factors. This study aimed to define the incidence, risk factors and impact of EABC. METHODS: The NHS registry on adult liver transplantation between 2006 and 2017 was reviewed retrospectively. Adjusted regression models were used to assess predictors of EABC, and their impact on outcomes. RESULTS: Analyses included 8304 liver transplant recipients. Patients with EABC (9·6 per cent) had prolonged hospitalization (23 versus 15 days; P < 0·001) and increased chance for readmission within the first year (56 versus 32 per cent; P < 0·001). Patients with EABC had decreased estimated 5-year graft survival of 75·1 versus 84·5 per cent in those without EABC, and decreased 5-year patient survival of 76·9 versus 83·3 per cent; both P < 0.001. Adjusted Cox regression revealed that EABCs have a significant and independent impact on graft survival (leak hazard ratio (HR) 1·344, P = 0·015; stricture HR 1·513, P = 0·002; leak plus stricture HR 1·526, P = 0·036) and patient survival (leak HR 1·215, P = 0·136, stricture HR 1·526, P = 0·001; leak plus stricture HR 1·509; P = 0·043). On adjusted logistic regression, risk factors for EABC included donation after circulatory death grafts, graft aberrant arterial anatomy, biliary anastomosis type, vascular anastomosis time and recipient model of end-stage liver disease. CONCLUSION: EABCs prolong hospital stay, increase readmission rates and are independent risk factors for graft loss and increased mortality. This study has identified factors that increase the likelihood of EABC occurrence; research into interventions to prevent EABCs in these at-risk groups is vital to improve liver transplantation outcomes. Oxford University Press 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8047096/ /pubmed/33855363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab019 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tingle, S J
Thompson, E R
Ali, S S
Figueiredo, R
Hudson, M
Sen, G
White, S A
Manas, D M
Wilson, C H
Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis
title Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis
title_full Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis
title_fullStr Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis
title_short Risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: UK registry analysis
title_sort risk factors and impact of early anastomotic biliary complications after liver transplantation: uk registry analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab019
work_keys_str_mv AT tinglesj riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis
AT thompsoner riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis
AT aliss riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis
AT figueiredor riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis
AT hudsonm riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis
AT seng riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis
AT whitesa riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis
AT manasdm riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis
AT wilsonch riskfactorsandimpactofearlyanastomoticbiliarycomplicationsafterlivertransplantationukregistryanalysis