Cargando…
Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) is increasing strategy in coronary artery patients. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the impact of sex on outcomes of patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI. METHODS: From Jan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Science Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907546 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.004 |
_version_ | 1783678996002635776 |
---|---|
author | LIU, Sheng-Wen GUAN, Chang-Dong HU, Feng-Huan CHEN, Jue DOU, Ke-Fei YANG, Wei-Xian WU, Yong-Jian YANG, Yue-Jin XU, Bo QIAO, Shu-Bin |
author_facet | LIU, Sheng-Wen GUAN, Chang-Dong HU, Feng-Huan CHEN, Jue DOU, Ke-Fei YANG, Wei-Xian WU, Yong-Jian YANG, Yue-Jin XU, Bo QIAO, Shu-Bin |
author_sort | LIU, Sheng-Wen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) is increasing strategy in coronary artery patients. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the impact of sex on outcomes of patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2015, there were 3,960 patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI at our institution, including 3,121 (78.8%) men and 839 (21.2%) women. The clinical outcome included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization), all-cause death, MI, revascularization at three years follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with men, women had not significantly different MACE (14.7% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.89, all-cause death (3.5% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.76), MI (5.0% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.38), revascularization (9.1% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.86), respectively. After adjustment, rates of MACE (HR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.24−1.81;P < 0.0001) and all-cause death (HR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.09−2.48; P = 0.017) occurred more frequently in male patients, as well as revascularization (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.16−1.85;P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this analysis, compared to men, women undergoing ULMCAD PCI have better outcomes of MACE, all-cause death, and revascularization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8047187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Science Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80471872021-04-26 Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease LIU, Sheng-Wen GUAN, Chang-Dong HU, Feng-Huan CHEN, Jue DOU, Ke-Fei YANG, Wei-Xian WU, Yong-Jian YANG, Yue-Jin XU, Bo QIAO, Shu-Bin J Geriatr Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) is increasing strategy in coronary artery patients. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the impact of sex on outcomes of patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2015, there were 3,960 patients undergoing ULMCAD PCI at our institution, including 3,121 (78.8%) men and 839 (21.2%) women. The clinical outcome included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization), all-cause death, MI, revascularization at three years follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with men, women had not significantly different MACE (14.7% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.89, all-cause death (3.5% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.76), MI (5.0% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.38), revascularization (9.1% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.86), respectively. After adjustment, rates of MACE (HR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.24−1.81;P < 0.0001) and all-cause death (HR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.09−2.48; P = 0.017) occurred more frequently in male patients, as well as revascularization (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.16−1.85;P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this analysis, compared to men, women undergoing ULMCAD PCI have better outcomes of MACE, all-cause death, and revascularization. Science Press 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8047187/ /pubmed/33907546 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.004 Text en Copyright and License information: Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research Article LIU, Sheng-Wen GUAN, Chang-Dong HU, Feng-Huan CHEN, Jue DOU, Ke-Fei YANG, Wei-Xian WU, Yong-Jian YANG, Yue-Jin XU, Bo QIAO, Shu-Bin Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease |
title | Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease |
title_full | Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease |
title_fullStr | Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease |
title_short | Comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease |
title_sort | comparison of outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention in men and women with unprotected left main disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907546 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.03.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liushengwen comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT guanchangdong comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT hufenghuan comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT chenjue comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT doukefei comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT yangweixian comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT wuyongjian comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT yangyuejin comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT xubo comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease AT qiaoshubin comparisonofoutcomesforpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioninmenandwomenwithunprotectedleftmaindisease |