Cargando…

Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common pelvic disorder among women. A standard staging system is needed to carefully evaluate the extent and severity of the disease, and initiate appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the two methods of standard and simplified pelvic orga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghanbari, Zinat, Peivandi, Saloumeh, Pasikhani, Maryam Deldar, Darabi, Foroohar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research and Publications Office of Jimma University 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883837
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v30i6.10
_version_ 1783679006474764288
author Ghanbari, Zinat
Peivandi, Saloumeh
Pasikhani, Maryam Deldar
Darabi, Foroohar
author_facet Ghanbari, Zinat
Peivandi, Saloumeh
Pasikhani, Maryam Deldar
Darabi, Foroohar
author_sort Ghanbari, Zinat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common pelvic disorder among women. A standard staging system is needed to carefully evaluate the extent and severity of the disease, and initiate appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the two methods of standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in clinical staging of Iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted on all women with complaints of seeing or feeling a vaginal lump or bulge and/or a dragging sensation who were presented to a pelvic floor disorders clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran, Iran, from October 2018 to June 2019. All patients were evaluated in terms of pelvic organ prolapse severity and staging using both instruments. Also, length of time needed to complete the questionnaires were calculated. After data collection, the results of pelvic organ prolapse staging and degree of agreement between two examiners were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 120 women with mean age of 50.92±13.12 years were evaluated. It was shown that there is an almost perfect agreement (kappa coefficient > 0.8) between standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in all the 3 compartments. Also, there was almost a twofold increase in the time needed to perform standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification (4.16±1.01 minutes) compared to performing simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (2.12±1.14 minutes) (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, there is a substantial and almost perfect agreement between standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in clinical staging of Iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse. It seems that using simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system is more applicable in clinical practice for staging of pelvic organ prolapse, with high reliability coefficient
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8047234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Research and Publications Office of Jimma University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80472342021-04-20 Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Ghanbari, Zinat Peivandi, Saloumeh Pasikhani, Maryam Deldar Darabi, Foroohar Ethiop J Health Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common pelvic disorder among women. A standard staging system is needed to carefully evaluate the extent and severity of the disease, and initiate appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the two methods of standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in clinical staging of Iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted on all women with complaints of seeing or feeling a vaginal lump or bulge and/or a dragging sensation who were presented to a pelvic floor disorders clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran, Iran, from October 2018 to June 2019. All patients were evaluated in terms of pelvic organ prolapse severity and staging using both instruments. Also, length of time needed to complete the questionnaires were calculated. After data collection, the results of pelvic organ prolapse staging and degree of agreement between two examiners were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 120 women with mean age of 50.92±13.12 years were evaluated. It was shown that there is an almost perfect agreement (kappa coefficient > 0.8) between standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in all the 3 compartments. Also, there was almost a twofold increase in the time needed to perform standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification (4.16±1.01 minutes) compared to performing simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (2.12±1.14 minutes) (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, there is a substantial and almost perfect agreement between standard and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in clinical staging of Iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse. It seems that using simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system is more applicable in clinical practice for staging of pelvic organ prolapse, with high reliability coefficient Research and Publications Office of Jimma University 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8047234/ /pubmed/33883837 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v30i6.10 Text en © 2020 Zinat G., et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghanbari, Zinat
Peivandi, Saloumeh
Pasikhani, Maryam Deldar
Darabi, Foroohar
Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_full Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_fullStr Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_short Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_sort comparison of pelvic organ prolapse quantification and simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification systems in clinical staging of iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33883837
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v30i6.10
work_keys_str_mv AT ghanbarizinat comparisonofpelvicorganprolapsequantificationandsimplifiedpelvicorganprolapsequantificationsystemsinclinicalstagingofiranianwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT peivandisaloumeh comparisonofpelvicorganprolapsequantificationandsimplifiedpelvicorganprolapsequantificationsystemsinclinicalstagingofiranianwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT pasikhanimaryamdeldar comparisonofpelvicorganprolapsequantificationandsimplifiedpelvicorganprolapsequantificationsystemsinclinicalstagingofiranianwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT darabiforoohar comparisonofpelvicorganprolapsequantificationandsimplifiedpelvicorganprolapsequantificationsystemsinclinicalstagingofiranianwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse