Cargando…

Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy

Echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF) is one of the most common ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in prenatal screening. However, the association of EIF with chromosomal abnormalities is still controversial. From January 2018 to April 2020, a total of 571 fetuses with USMs in our center were enrolled, amo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Yaxian, Xu, Jingjing, Li, Hongmiao, Gao, Jiong, Wu, Limin, He, Guoping, Liu, Wen, Hu, Yue, Peng, Yaqin, Yang, Fang, Jiang, Xiaohua, Wang, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.626044
_version_ 1783679077079580672
author Song, Yaxian
Xu, Jingjing
Li, Hongmiao
Gao, Jiong
Wu, Limin
He, Guoping
Liu, Wen
Hu, Yue
Peng, Yaqin
Yang, Fang
Jiang, Xiaohua
Wang, Jing
author_facet Song, Yaxian
Xu, Jingjing
Li, Hongmiao
Gao, Jiong
Wu, Limin
He, Guoping
Liu, Wen
Hu, Yue
Peng, Yaqin
Yang, Fang
Jiang, Xiaohua
Wang, Jing
author_sort Song, Yaxian
collection PubMed
description Echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF) is one of the most common ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in prenatal screening. However, the association of EIF with chromosomal abnormalities is still controversial. From January 2018 to April 2020, a total of 571 fetuses with USMs in our center were enrolled, among which 150 (26.27%) presented EIFs. We analyzed the karyotype anomalies and copy number variations (CNVs) in fetuses who presented EIFs by comparing their ultrasound indications, maternal ages and gestational stages. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities between fetuses with EIFs and the fetuses with USMs (4.00 vs. 7.71%, p = 0.112). Additionally, the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was not related to maternal age (4.10% in maternal age below 35 yeas vs. 3.57% in maternal age above 35, p = 1.000). Interestingly, after 28 weeks of gestation, fetuses with EIFs showed more chromosomal abnormalities (20.00%) than that in the group before 28 weeks of gestation (2.22%, p = 0.014), and this result was attributed to the detection of pathogenic CNVs. After birth, 25 of children conducted cardiac development re-examination. Among them, 9 (36%, 9/25) were diagnosed with congenital heart disease, primarily patent foramen oval and ventricular septal defects (7/9, 77.77%). We concluded that the appearance of EIFs in early or mid-trimester would not indicate an increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. However, the persistence of EIFs in late trimester was associated with a higher risk of pathology-related CNVs and its persistent appearance may indicate heart development defects after birth. Thus, our results suggest that CNV detection has its advantages in prenatal diagnosis, especially for those with EIFs that persist in the third trimester.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8047624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80476242021-04-16 Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy Song, Yaxian Xu, Jingjing Li, Hongmiao Gao, Jiong Wu, Limin He, Guoping Liu, Wen Hu, Yue Peng, Yaqin Yang, Fang Jiang, Xiaohua Wang, Jing Front Genet Genetics Echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF) is one of the most common ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in prenatal screening. However, the association of EIF with chromosomal abnormalities is still controversial. From January 2018 to April 2020, a total of 571 fetuses with USMs in our center were enrolled, among which 150 (26.27%) presented EIFs. We analyzed the karyotype anomalies and copy number variations (CNVs) in fetuses who presented EIFs by comparing their ultrasound indications, maternal ages and gestational stages. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities between fetuses with EIFs and the fetuses with USMs (4.00 vs. 7.71%, p = 0.112). Additionally, the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was not related to maternal age (4.10% in maternal age below 35 yeas vs. 3.57% in maternal age above 35, p = 1.000). Interestingly, after 28 weeks of gestation, fetuses with EIFs showed more chromosomal abnormalities (20.00%) than that in the group before 28 weeks of gestation (2.22%, p = 0.014), and this result was attributed to the detection of pathogenic CNVs. After birth, 25 of children conducted cardiac development re-examination. Among them, 9 (36%, 9/25) were diagnosed with congenital heart disease, primarily patent foramen oval and ventricular septal defects (7/9, 77.77%). We concluded that the appearance of EIFs in early or mid-trimester would not indicate an increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. However, the persistence of EIFs in late trimester was associated with a higher risk of pathology-related CNVs and its persistent appearance may indicate heart development defects after birth. Thus, our results suggest that CNV detection has its advantages in prenatal diagnosis, especially for those with EIFs that persist in the third trimester. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8047624/ /pubmed/33868367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.626044 Text en Copyright © 2021 Song, Xu, Li, Gao, Wu, He, Liu, Hu, Peng, Yang, Jiang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Song, Yaxian
Xu, Jingjing
Li, Hongmiao
Gao, Jiong
Wu, Limin
He, Guoping
Liu, Wen
Hu, Yue
Peng, Yaqin
Yang, Fang
Jiang, Xiaohua
Wang, Jing
Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy
title Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy
title_full Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy
title_fullStr Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy
title_short Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy
title_sort application of copy number variation detection to fetal diagnosis of echogenic intracardiac focus during pregnancy
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.626044
work_keys_str_mv AT songyaxian applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT xujingjing applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT lihongmiao applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT gaojiong applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT wulimin applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT heguoping applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT liuwen applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT huyue applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT pengyaqin applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT yangfang applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT jiangxiaohua applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy
AT wangjing applicationofcopynumbervariationdetectiontofetaldiagnosisofechogenicintracardiacfocusduringpregnancy