Cargando…
Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications
BACKGROUND: The full utility of an acute treatment requires examination of the entire time course of effect during a migraine attack. Here the time course of effect of ubrogepant is evaluated. METHODS: ACHIEVE-I and -II were double-blind, single-attack, Phase 3 trials. Adults with migraine were rand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33241721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102420970523 |
_version_ | 1783679097134645248 |
---|---|
author | Goadsby, Peter J Blumenfeld, Andrew M Lipton, Richard B Dodick, David W Kalidas, Kavita M Adams, Aubrey Jakate, Abhijeet Liu, Chengcheng Szegedi, Armin Trugman, Joel M |
author_facet | Goadsby, Peter J Blumenfeld, Andrew M Lipton, Richard B Dodick, David W Kalidas, Kavita M Adams, Aubrey Jakate, Abhijeet Liu, Chengcheng Szegedi, Armin Trugman, Joel M |
author_sort | Goadsby, Peter J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The full utility of an acute treatment requires examination of the entire time course of effect during a migraine attack. Here the time course of effect of ubrogepant is evaluated. METHODS: ACHIEVE-I and -II were double-blind, single-attack, Phase 3 trials. Adults with migraine were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo or ubrogepant (50mg or 100mg, ACHIEVE-I; 25 mg or 50 mg, ACHIEVE-II). Pain freedom, absence of most bothersome symptom, and pain relief were assessed at various timepoints. Samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Data were pooled for this post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Participants’ (n = 912 placebo, n = 887 ubrogepant 50 mg, pooled analysis population) mean age was 41 years, with a majority female and white. Pain relief separated from placebo by 1 h (43% versus 37% [OR, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.0–1.59]), absence of most bothersome symptom by 1.5 h (28% versus 22% [1.42, 1.14–1.77]), and pain freedom by 2 h (20% vs. 13% [1.72, 1.33–2.22]). Efficacy was sustained from 2–24 h (pain relief: 1.71, 1.1–2.6; pain freedom: 1.71, 1.3–2.3) and remained separated at 48 h (pain relief: 1.7, 1.1–2.6; pain freedom: 1.31, 1.0–1.7). Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated maximum plasma concentrations were achieved at 1 h, with pharmacologically active concentrations reached within 11 min and remaining above the EC(90) for nearly 12 h. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the time course of effect of ubrogepant showed pain relief as the most sensitive and earliest measure of clinical effect, followed by absence of most bothersome symptom, and pain freedom. Efficacy was demonstrated out to 48 h, providing evidence of the long-lasting effect of ubrogepant. This evaluation supports the role of examining the entire time course of effect to understand fully the utility of an acute treatment for migraine. Trial registration: ACHIEVE I (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02828020) and ACHIEVE II (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02867709) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8047719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80477192021-05-04 Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications Goadsby, Peter J Blumenfeld, Andrew M Lipton, Richard B Dodick, David W Kalidas, Kavita M Adams, Aubrey Jakate, Abhijeet Liu, Chengcheng Szegedi, Armin Trugman, Joel M Cephalalgia Original Articles BACKGROUND: The full utility of an acute treatment requires examination of the entire time course of effect during a migraine attack. Here the time course of effect of ubrogepant is evaluated. METHODS: ACHIEVE-I and -II were double-blind, single-attack, Phase 3 trials. Adults with migraine were randomised 1:1:1 to placebo or ubrogepant (50mg or 100mg, ACHIEVE-I; 25 mg or 50 mg, ACHIEVE-II). Pain freedom, absence of most bothersome symptom, and pain relief were assessed at various timepoints. Samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Data were pooled for this post-hoc analysis. RESULTS: Participants’ (n = 912 placebo, n = 887 ubrogepant 50 mg, pooled analysis population) mean age was 41 years, with a majority female and white. Pain relief separated from placebo by 1 h (43% versus 37% [OR, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.0–1.59]), absence of most bothersome symptom by 1.5 h (28% versus 22% [1.42, 1.14–1.77]), and pain freedom by 2 h (20% vs. 13% [1.72, 1.33–2.22]). Efficacy was sustained from 2–24 h (pain relief: 1.71, 1.1–2.6; pain freedom: 1.71, 1.3–2.3) and remained separated at 48 h (pain relief: 1.7, 1.1–2.6; pain freedom: 1.31, 1.0–1.7). Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated maximum plasma concentrations were achieved at 1 h, with pharmacologically active concentrations reached within 11 min and remaining above the EC(90) for nearly 12 h. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the time course of effect of ubrogepant showed pain relief as the most sensitive and earliest measure of clinical effect, followed by absence of most bothersome symptom, and pain freedom. Efficacy was demonstrated out to 48 h, providing evidence of the long-lasting effect of ubrogepant. This evaluation supports the role of examining the entire time course of effect to understand fully the utility of an acute treatment for migraine. Trial registration: ACHIEVE I (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02828020) and ACHIEVE II (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02867709) SAGE Publications 2020-11-26 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8047719/ /pubmed/33241721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102420970523 Text en © International Headache Society 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Goadsby, Peter J Blumenfeld, Andrew M Lipton, Richard B Dodick, David W Kalidas, Kavita M Adams, Aubrey Jakate, Abhijeet Liu, Chengcheng Szegedi, Armin Trugman, Joel M Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications |
title | Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications |
title_full | Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications |
title_fullStr | Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications |
title_short | Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications |
title_sort | time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: clinical implications |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33241721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102420970523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goadsbypeterj timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT blumenfeldandrewm timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT liptonrichardb timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT dodickdavidw timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT kalidaskavita timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT madamsaubrey timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT jakateabhijeet timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT liuchengcheng timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT szegediarmin timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications AT trugmanjoelm timecourseofefficacyofubrogepantfortheacutetreatmentofmigraineclinicalimplications |