Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy, correlation and agreement between the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia. METHODS: The BIS, BISpro, heart rate, target-concentration of propofol and Observer’s Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) score were recorded every 30 s i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhitao, Cai, Jiachun, Li, Jiexiong, Xu, Xianghui, Zheng, Limin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211001705
_version_ 1783679120476995584
author Li, Zhitao
Cai, Jiachun
Li, Jiexiong
Xu, Xianghui
Zheng, Limin
author_facet Li, Zhitao
Cai, Jiachun
Li, Jiexiong
Xu, Xianghui
Zheng, Limin
author_sort Li, Zhitao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy, correlation and agreement between the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia. METHODS: The BIS, BISpro, heart rate, target-concentration of propofol and Observer’s Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) score were recorded every 30 s in female patients scheduled for hysteroscopic surgery. Propofol anaesthesia was induced by an initial target-controlled concentration (1.0 μg/ml) followed by a stepwise increase (0.5 μg/ml) until the patient was unresponsive. Spearman’s correlation coefficient and prediction probability were calculated for the association between sedation levels and the above parameters. The ability of investigated parameters to distinguish between OAA/S scores was analysed. Bland–Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement between BIS and BISpro. The BIS and BISpro cut-off values for lost response were also determined. RESULTS: Out of 30 patients in total, a high correlation was found between BIS and BISpro, and both correlated well with OAA/S score. Only BIS was able to distinguish all investigated OAA/S states accurately, but the ability to predict OAA/S score 5 to loss of response was comparable between BIS and BISpro. The calculated cut-off values were 68 for BIS and 70 for BISpro. CONCLUSION: BISpro and BIS are reliable monitors of general anaesthesia during sedation. Trial registration number: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (URL: www.chictr.org.cn): ChiCTR1900024037 (retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8047833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80478332021-04-27 Comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia Li, Zhitao Cai, Jiachun Li, Jiexiong Xu, Xianghui Zheng, Limin J Int Med Res Prospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy, correlation and agreement between the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia. METHODS: The BIS, BISpro, heart rate, target-concentration of propofol and Observer’s Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAA/S) score were recorded every 30 s in female patients scheduled for hysteroscopic surgery. Propofol anaesthesia was induced by an initial target-controlled concentration (1.0 μg/ml) followed by a stepwise increase (0.5 μg/ml) until the patient was unresponsive. Spearman’s correlation coefficient and prediction probability were calculated for the association between sedation levels and the above parameters. The ability of investigated parameters to distinguish between OAA/S scores was analysed. Bland–Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement between BIS and BISpro. The BIS and BISpro cut-off values for lost response were also determined. RESULTS: Out of 30 patients in total, a high correlation was found between BIS and BISpro, and both correlated well with OAA/S score. Only BIS was able to distinguish all investigated OAA/S states accurately, but the ability to predict OAA/S score 5 to loss of response was comparable between BIS and BISpro. The calculated cut-off values were 68 for BIS and 70 for BISpro. CONCLUSION: BISpro and BIS are reliable monitors of general anaesthesia during sedation. Trial registration number: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (URL: www.chictr.org.cn): ChiCTR1900024037 (retrospectively registered). SAGE Publications 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8047833/ /pubmed/33845600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211001705 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Prospective Clinical Research Report
Li, Zhitao
Cai, Jiachun
Li, Jiexiong
Xu, Xianghui
Zheng, Limin
Comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia
title Comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia
title_full Comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia
title_short Comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (BIS) and BISpro during propofol anaesthesia
title_sort comparative evaluation of the bispectral index (bis) and bispro during propofol anaesthesia
topic Prospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211001705
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhitao comparativeevaluationofthebispectralindexbisandbisproduringpropofolanaesthesia
AT caijiachun comparativeevaluationofthebispectralindexbisandbisproduringpropofolanaesthesia
AT lijiexiong comparativeevaluationofthebispectralindexbisandbisproduringpropofolanaesthesia
AT xuxianghui comparativeevaluationofthebispectralindexbisandbisproduringpropofolanaesthesia
AT zhenglimin comparativeevaluationofthebispectralindexbisandbisproduringpropofolanaesthesia