Cargando…

Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices

Optimization of spatial resource allocation is crucial for the successful control of invasive species under a limited budget but requires labor‐intensive surveys to estimate population parameters. In this study, we devised a novel framework for the spatially explicit optimization of capture effort a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishimoto, Makoto, Miyashita, Tadashi, Yokomizo, Hiroyuki, Matsuda, Hiroyuki, Imazu, Takeshi, Takahashi, Hiroo, Hasegawa, Masami, Fukasawa, Keita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2261
_version_ 1783679131725070336
author Nishimoto, Makoto
Miyashita, Tadashi
Yokomizo, Hiroyuki
Matsuda, Hiroyuki
Imazu, Takeshi
Takahashi, Hiroo
Hasegawa, Masami
Fukasawa, Keita
author_facet Nishimoto, Makoto
Miyashita, Tadashi
Yokomizo, Hiroyuki
Matsuda, Hiroyuki
Imazu, Takeshi
Takahashi, Hiroo
Hasegawa, Masami
Fukasawa, Keita
author_sort Nishimoto, Makoto
collection PubMed
description Optimization of spatial resource allocation is crucial for the successful control of invasive species under a limited budget but requires labor‐intensive surveys to estimate population parameters. In this study, we devised a novel framework for the spatially explicit optimization of capture effort allocation using state‐space population models from past capture records. We applied it to a control program for invasive snapping turtles to determine effort allocation strategies that minimize the population density over the whole area. We found that spatially heterogeneous density dependence and capture pressure limit the abundance of snapping turtles. Optimal effort allocation effectively improved the control effect, but the degree of improvement varied substantially depending on the total effort. The degree of improvement by the spatial optimization of allocation effort was only 3.21% when the total effort was maintained at the 2016 level. However, when the total effort was increased by two, four, and eight times, spatial optimization resulted in improvements of 4.65%, 8.33%, and 20.35%, respectively. To achieve the management goal for snapping turtles in our study area, increasing the current total effort by more than four times was necessary, in addition to optimizing the spatial effort. The snapping turtle population is expected to reach the target density one year after the optimal management strategy is implemented, and this rapid response can be explained by high population growth rate coupled with density‐dependent feedback regulation. Our results demonstrated that combining a state‐space model with optimization makes it possible to adaptively improve the management of invasive species and decision‐making. The method used in this study, based on removal records from an invasive management program, can be easily applied to monitoring data for wildlife and pest control management using traps in a variety of ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8047888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80478882021-04-16 Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices Nishimoto, Makoto Miyashita, Tadashi Yokomizo, Hiroyuki Matsuda, Hiroyuki Imazu, Takeshi Takahashi, Hiroo Hasegawa, Masami Fukasawa, Keita Ecol Appl Articles Optimization of spatial resource allocation is crucial for the successful control of invasive species under a limited budget but requires labor‐intensive surveys to estimate population parameters. In this study, we devised a novel framework for the spatially explicit optimization of capture effort allocation using state‐space population models from past capture records. We applied it to a control program for invasive snapping turtles to determine effort allocation strategies that minimize the population density over the whole area. We found that spatially heterogeneous density dependence and capture pressure limit the abundance of snapping turtles. Optimal effort allocation effectively improved the control effect, but the degree of improvement varied substantially depending on the total effort. The degree of improvement by the spatial optimization of allocation effort was only 3.21% when the total effort was maintained at the 2016 level. However, when the total effort was increased by two, four, and eight times, spatial optimization resulted in improvements of 4.65%, 8.33%, and 20.35%, respectively. To achieve the management goal for snapping turtles in our study area, increasing the current total effort by more than four times was necessary, in addition to optimizing the spatial effort. The snapping turtle population is expected to reach the target density one year after the optimal management strategy is implemented, and this rapid response can be explained by high population growth rate coupled with density‐dependent feedback regulation. Our results demonstrated that combining a state‐space model with optimization makes it possible to adaptively improve the management of invasive species and decision‐making. The method used in this study, based on removal records from an invasive management program, can be easily applied to monitoring data for wildlife and pest control management using traps in a variety of ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-21 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8047888/ /pubmed/33219543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2261 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Nishimoto, Makoto
Miyashita, Tadashi
Yokomizo, Hiroyuki
Matsuda, Hiroyuki
Imazu, Takeshi
Takahashi, Hiroo
Hasegawa, Masami
Fukasawa, Keita
Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices
title Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices
title_full Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices
title_fullStr Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices
title_full_unstemmed Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices
title_short Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices
title_sort spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2261
work_keys_str_mv AT nishimotomakoto spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices
AT miyashitatadashi spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices
AT yokomizohiroyuki spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices
AT matsudahiroyuki spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices
AT imazutakeshi spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices
AT takahashihiroo spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices
AT hasegawamasami spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices
AT fukasawakeita spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices