Cargando…
Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices
Optimization of spatial resource allocation is crucial for the successful control of invasive species under a limited budget but requires labor‐intensive surveys to estimate population parameters. In this study, we devised a novel framework for the spatially explicit optimization of capture effort a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2261 |
_version_ | 1783679131725070336 |
---|---|
author | Nishimoto, Makoto Miyashita, Tadashi Yokomizo, Hiroyuki Matsuda, Hiroyuki Imazu, Takeshi Takahashi, Hiroo Hasegawa, Masami Fukasawa, Keita |
author_facet | Nishimoto, Makoto Miyashita, Tadashi Yokomizo, Hiroyuki Matsuda, Hiroyuki Imazu, Takeshi Takahashi, Hiroo Hasegawa, Masami Fukasawa, Keita |
author_sort | Nishimoto, Makoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Optimization of spatial resource allocation is crucial for the successful control of invasive species under a limited budget but requires labor‐intensive surveys to estimate population parameters. In this study, we devised a novel framework for the spatially explicit optimization of capture effort allocation using state‐space population models from past capture records. We applied it to a control program for invasive snapping turtles to determine effort allocation strategies that minimize the population density over the whole area. We found that spatially heterogeneous density dependence and capture pressure limit the abundance of snapping turtles. Optimal effort allocation effectively improved the control effect, but the degree of improvement varied substantially depending on the total effort. The degree of improvement by the spatial optimization of allocation effort was only 3.21% when the total effort was maintained at the 2016 level. However, when the total effort was increased by two, four, and eight times, spatial optimization resulted in improvements of 4.65%, 8.33%, and 20.35%, respectively. To achieve the management goal for snapping turtles in our study area, increasing the current total effort by more than four times was necessary, in addition to optimizing the spatial effort. The snapping turtle population is expected to reach the target density one year after the optimal management strategy is implemented, and this rapid response can be explained by high population growth rate coupled with density‐dependent feedback regulation. Our results demonstrated that combining a state‐space model with optimization makes it possible to adaptively improve the management of invasive species and decision‐making. The method used in this study, based on removal records from an invasive management program, can be easily applied to monitoring data for wildlife and pest control management using traps in a variety of ecosystems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8047888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80478882021-04-16 Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices Nishimoto, Makoto Miyashita, Tadashi Yokomizo, Hiroyuki Matsuda, Hiroyuki Imazu, Takeshi Takahashi, Hiroo Hasegawa, Masami Fukasawa, Keita Ecol Appl Articles Optimization of spatial resource allocation is crucial for the successful control of invasive species under a limited budget but requires labor‐intensive surveys to estimate population parameters. In this study, we devised a novel framework for the spatially explicit optimization of capture effort allocation using state‐space population models from past capture records. We applied it to a control program for invasive snapping turtles to determine effort allocation strategies that minimize the population density over the whole area. We found that spatially heterogeneous density dependence and capture pressure limit the abundance of snapping turtles. Optimal effort allocation effectively improved the control effect, but the degree of improvement varied substantially depending on the total effort. The degree of improvement by the spatial optimization of allocation effort was only 3.21% when the total effort was maintained at the 2016 level. However, when the total effort was increased by two, four, and eight times, spatial optimization resulted in improvements of 4.65%, 8.33%, and 20.35%, respectively. To achieve the management goal for snapping turtles in our study area, increasing the current total effort by more than four times was necessary, in addition to optimizing the spatial effort. The snapping turtle population is expected to reach the target density one year after the optimal management strategy is implemented, and this rapid response can be explained by high population growth rate coupled with density‐dependent feedback regulation. Our results demonstrated that combining a state‐space model with optimization makes it possible to adaptively improve the management of invasive species and decision‐making. The method used in this study, based on removal records from an invasive management program, can be easily applied to monitoring data for wildlife and pest control management using traps in a variety of ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-21 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8047888/ /pubmed/33219543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2261 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Nishimoto, Makoto Miyashita, Tadashi Yokomizo, Hiroyuki Matsuda, Hiroyuki Imazu, Takeshi Takahashi, Hiroo Hasegawa, Masami Fukasawa, Keita Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices |
title | Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices |
title_full | Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices |
title_fullStr | Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices |
title_short | Spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices |
title_sort | spatial optimization of invasive species control informed by management practices |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8047888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nishimotomakoto spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices AT miyashitatadashi spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices AT yokomizohiroyuki spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices AT matsudahiroyuki spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices AT imazutakeshi spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices AT takahashihiroo spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices AT hasegawamasami spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices AT fukasawakeita spatialoptimizationofinvasivespeciescontrolinformedbymanagementpractices |