Cargando…

Long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The evidence of the long-term effects of multiple lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk is uncertain. We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors in subjects at high cardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergum, Hilde, Sandven, Irene, Klemsdal, Tor Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33858345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01989-5
_version_ 1783679167235096576
author Bergum, Hilde
Sandven, Irene
Klemsdal, Tor Ole
author_facet Bergum, Hilde
Sandven, Irene
Klemsdal, Tor Ole
author_sort Bergum, Hilde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evidence of the long-term effects of multiple lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk is uncertain. We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Eligible trials investigated the impact of lifestyle intervention versus usual care with minimum 24 months follow-up, reporting more than one major cardiovascular risk factor. A literature search updated April 15, 2020 identified 12 eligible studies. The results from individual trials were combined, using fixed and random effect models, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) to estimate effect sizes. Small-study effect was evaluated, and heterogeneity between studies examined, by subgroup and meta-regression analyses, considering patient- and study-level variables. RESULTS: Small-study effect was not identified. Lifestyle intervention reduced systolic blood pressure modestly with an estimated SMD of − 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): − 0.21 to − 0.04, with moderate heterogeneity (I(2) = 59%), corresponding to a mean difference of approximately 2 mmHg (MD = − 1.86, 95% CI − 3.14 to − 0.57, p = 0.0046). This effect disappeared in the subgroup of trials judged at low risk of bias (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI − 0.08 to 0.11). For the outcome total cholesterol SMD was − 0.06, 95% CI − 0.13 to 0.00, with no heterogeneity (I(2) = 0%), indicating no effect of the intervention. CONCLUSION: Lifestyle intervention resulted in only a modest effect on systolic blood pressure and no effect on total cholesterol after 24 months. Further lifestyle trials should consider the challenge of maintaining larger long-term benefits to ensure impact on cardiovascular outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-01989-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8048075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80480752021-04-15 Long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis Bergum, Hilde Sandven, Irene Klemsdal, Tor Ole BMC Cardiovasc Disord Article BACKGROUND: The evidence of the long-term effects of multiple lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk is uncertain. We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Eligible trials investigated the impact of lifestyle intervention versus usual care with minimum 24 months follow-up, reporting more than one major cardiovascular risk factor. A literature search updated April 15, 2020 identified 12 eligible studies. The results from individual trials were combined, using fixed and random effect models, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) to estimate effect sizes. Small-study effect was evaluated, and heterogeneity between studies examined, by subgroup and meta-regression analyses, considering patient- and study-level variables. RESULTS: Small-study effect was not identified. Lifestyle intervention reduced systolic blood pressure modestly with an estimated SMD of − 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): − 0.21 to − 0.04, with moderate heterogeneity (I(2) = 59%), corresponding to a mean difference of approximately 2 mmHg (MD = − 1.86, 95% CI − 3.14 to − 0.57, p = 0.0046). This effect disappeared in the subgroup of trials judged at low risk of bias (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI − 0.08 to 0.11). For the outcome total cholesterol SMD was − 0.06, 95% CI − 0.13 to 0.00, with no heterogeneity (I(2) = 0%), indicating no effect of the intervention. CONCLUSION: Lifestyle intervention resulted in only a modest effect on systolic blood pressure and no effect on total cholesterol after 24 months. Further lifestyle trials should consider the challenge of maintaining larger long-term benefits to ensure impact on cardiovascular outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-01989-5. BioMed Central 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8048075/ /pubmed/33858345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01989-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Article
Bergum, Hilde
Sandven, Irene
Klemsdal, Tor Ole
Long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis
title Long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis
title_full Long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis
title_short Long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis
title_sort long-term effects (> 24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high-risk subjects: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33858345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01989-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bergumhilde longtermeffects24monthsofmultiplelifestyleinterventiononmajorcardiovascularriskfactorsamonghighrisksubjectsametaanalysis
AT sandvenirene longtermeffects24monthsofmultiplelifestyleinterventiononmajorcardiovascularriskfactorsamonghighrisksubjectsametaanalysis
AT klemsdaltorole longtermeffects24monthsofmultiplelifestyleinterventiononmajorcardiovascularriskfactorsamonghighrisksubjectsametaanalysis