Cargando…
How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change
Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13685 |
_version_ | 1783679231833669632 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Adam D. Inamine, Hidetoshi Buckling, Angus Roxburgh, Stephen H. Shea, Katriona |
author_facet | Miller, Adam D. Inamine, Hidetoshi Buckling, Angus Roxburgh, Stephen H. Shea, Katriona |
author_sort | Miller, Adam D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to communities with stable regimes. Here, we use an annual plant model to investigate how the history of disturbance alters invasion success. In particular, we show how two communities can have different outcomes from species introduction, solely due to past differences in disturbance regimes that generated different biotic legacies. We demonstrate that historical differences can enhance or suppress the persistence of introduced species, and that biotic legacies generated by stable disturbance history decay over time, though legacies can persist for unexpectedly long durations. This establishes a formal theoretical foundation for disturbance legacies having profound effects on communities, and highlights the value of further research on the biotic legacies of disturbance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8048489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80484892021-04-16 How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change Miller, Adam D. Inamine, Hidetoshi Buckling, Angus Roxburgh, Stephen H. Shea, Katriona Ecol Lett Letters Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to communities with stable regimes. Here, we use an annual plant model to investigate how the history of disturbance alters invasion success. In particular, we show how two communities can have different outcomes from species introduction, solely due to past differences in disturbance regimes that generated different biotic legacies. We demonstrate that historical differences can enhance or suppress the persistence of introduced species, and that biotic legacies generated by stable disturbance history decay over time, though legacies can persist for unexpectedly long durations. This establishes a formal theoretical foundation for disturbance legacies having profound effects on communities, and highlights the value of further research on the biotic legacies of disturbance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-27 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8048489/ /pubmed/33506576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13685 Text en ©2021 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Letters Miller, Adam D. Inamine, Hidetoshi Buckling, Angus Roxburgh, Stephen H. Shea, Katriona How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change |
title | How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change |
title_full | How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change |
title_fullStr | How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change |
title_full_unstemmed | How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change |
title_short | How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change |
title_sort | how disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change |
topic | Letters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milleradamd howdisturbancehistoryaltersinvasionsuccessbioticlegaciesandregimechange AT inaminehidetoshi howdisturbancehistoryaltersinvasionsuccessbioticlegaciesandregimechange AT bucklingangus howdisturbancehistoryaltersinvasionsuccessbioticlegaciesandregimechange AT roxburghstephenh howdisturbancehistoryaltersinvasionsuccessbioticlegaciesandregimechange AT sheakatriona howdisturbancehistoryaltersinvasionsuccessbioticlegaciesandregimechange |