Cargando…

Evaluation Strategies for Triple‐Drug Combinations against Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in an In Vitro Hollow‐Fiber Infection Model

Mounting antimicrobial resistance to carbapenemase‐producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) highlights the need to optimize currently available treatment options. The objective of this study was to explore alternative dosing strategies that limit the emergence of resistance to preserve the utility of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia, Estefany, Diep, John K., Sharma, Rajnikant, Hanafin, Patrick O., Abboud, Cely S., Kaye, Keith S., Li, Jian, Velkov, Tony, Rao, Gauri G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33548079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2197
_version_ 1783679232758513664
author Garcia, Estefany
Diep, John K.
Sharma, Rajnikant
Hanafin, Patrick O.
Abboud, Cely S.
Kaye, Keith S.
Li, Jian
Velkov, Tony
Rao, Gauri G.
author_facet Garcia, Estefany
Diep, John K.
Sharma, Rajnikant
Hanafin, Patrick O.
Abboud, Cely S.
Kaye, Keith S.
Li, Jian
Velkov, Tony
Rao, Gauri G.
author_sort Garcia, Estefany
collection PubMed
description Mounting antimicrobial resistance to carbapenemase‐producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) highlights the need to optimize currently available treatment options. The objective of this study was to explore alternative dosing strategies that limit the emergence of resistance to preserve the utility of last‐line antibiotics by: (i) evaluating the pharmacodynamic (PD) killing activity of simulated humanized exposures to monotherapy and two‐drug and three‐drug combinations against CPKP bacterial isolates with different resistance mechanisms; and (ii) optimizing polymyxin B (PMB) exposure simulated in the three‐drug combination regimens to maximize the killing activity. Two CPKP clinical isolates (BAA2146 (NDM‐1) and BRKP76 (KPC‐2)) were evaluated over 168 hours using a hollow‐fiber infection model simulating clinically relevant PMB, fosfomycin, and meropenem dosing regimens. PMB‐based three‐drug combinations were further optimized by varying the initial exposure (0–24 hours) or maintenance dose received over the duration of treatment. The area under the bacterial load‐versus‐time curve (AUCFU) was used to determine PD activity. Overall reductions in PMB exposure ranged from 2 to 84%. BAA2146 and BRKP76 had median (range) AUCFUs of 11.0 (10.6–11.6) log(10 )CFU hour/mL and 7.08 (7.04–11.9) log(10) CFU hour/mL, respectively. The PMB “front loaded” 2.5 mg/kg/day + 0.5 mg/kg maintenance dose in combination with meropenem and fosfomycin was a promising regimen against BRKP76, with an overall reduction in PMB exposure of 56% while still eradicating the bacteria. Tailored triple‐combination therapy allows for the optimization of dose and treatment duration of last‐line agents like PMB to achieve adequate drug exposure and appropriate PD activity while minimizing the emergence of resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8048493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80484932021-04-21 Evaluation Strategies for Triple‐Drug Combinations against Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in an In Vitro Hollow‐Fiber Infection Model Garcia, Estefany Diep, John K. Sharma, Rajnikant Hanafin, Patrick O. Abboud, Cely S. Kaye, Keith S. Li, Jian Velkov, Tony Rao, Gauri G. Clin Pharmacol Ther Research Mounting antimicrobial resistance to carbapenemase‐producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) highlights the need to optimize currently available treatment options. The objective of this study was to explore alternative dosing strategies that limit the emergence of resistance to preserve the utility of last‐line antibiotics by: (i) evaluating the pharmacodynamic (PD) killing activity of simulated humanized exposures to monotherapy and two‐drug and three‐drug combinations against CPKP bacterial isolates with different resistance mechanisms; and (ii) optimizing polymyxin B (PMB) exposure simulated in the three‐drug combination regimens to maximize the killing activity. Two CPKP clinical isolates (BAA2146 (NDM‐1) and BRKP76 (KPC‐2)) were evaluated over 168 hours using a hollow‐fiber infection model simulating clinically relevant PMB, fosfomycin, and meropenem dosing regimens. PMB‐based three‐drug combinations were further optimized by varying the initial exposure (0–24 hours) or maintenance dose received over the duration of treatment. The area under the bacterial load‐versus‐time curve (AUCFU) was used to determine PD activity. Overall reductions in PMB exposure ranged from 2 to 84%. BAA2146 and BRKP76 had median (range) AUCFUs of 11.0 (10.6–11.6) log(10 )CFU hour/mL and 7.08 (7.04–11.9) log(10) CFU hour/mL, respectively. The PMB “front loaded” 2.5 mg/kg/day + 0.5 mg/kg maintenance dose in combination with meropenem and fosfomycin was a promising regimen against BRKP76, with an overall reduction in PMB exposure of 56% while still eradicating the bacteria. Tailored triple‐combination therapy allows for the optimization of dose and treatment duration of last‐line agents like PMB to achieve adequate drug exposure and appropriate PD activity while minimizing the emergence of resistance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-04 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8048493/ /pubmed/33548079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2197 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research
Garcia, Estefany
Diep, John K.
Sharma, Rajnikant
Hanafin, Patrick O.
Abboud, Cely S.
Kaye, Keith S.
Li, Jian
Velkov, Tony
Rao, Gauri G.
Evaluation Strategies for Triple‐Drug Combinations against Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in an In Vitro Hollow‐Fiber Infection Model
title Evaluation Strategies for Triple‐Drug Combinations against Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in an In Vitro Hollow‐Fiber Infection Model
title_full Evaluation Strategies for Triple‐Drug Combinations against Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in an In Vitro Hollow‐Fiber Infection Model
title_fullStr Evaluation Strategies for Triple‐Drug Combinations against Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in an In Vitro Hollow‐Fiber Infection Model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation Strategies for Triple‐Drug Combinations against Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in an In Vitro Hollow‐Fiber Infection Model
title_short Evaluation Strategies for Triple‐Drug Combinations against Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in an In Vitro Hollow‐Fiber Infection Model
title_sort evaluation strategies for triple‐drug combinations against carbapenemase‐producing klebsiella pneumoniae in an in vitro hollow‐fiber infection model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33548079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2197
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaestefany evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT diepjohnk evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT sharmarajnikant evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT hanafinpatricko evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT abboudcelys evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT kayekeiths evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT lijian evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT velkovtony evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel
AT raogaurig evaluationstrategiesfortripledrugcombinationsagainstcarbapenemaseproducingklebsiellapneumoniaeinaninvitrohollowfiberinfectionmodel