Cargando…

Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidural anesthesia for open infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis surgery is a controversial issue in the presence of little comparative data. AIMS: To compare this approach to general anesthesia for desaturation events (≤90% oxygen saturation) and absolute values of minimal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Opfermann, Philipp, Wiener, Caspar, Schmid, Werner, Zadrazil, Markus, Metzelder, Martin, Kimberger, Oliver, Marhofer, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33368903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14114
_version_ 1783679232993394688
author Opfermann, Philipp
Wiener, Caspar
Schmid, Werner
Zadrazil, Markus
Metzelder, Martin
Kimberger, Oliver
Marhofer, Peter
author_facet Opfermann, Philipp
Wiener, Caspar
Schmid, Werner
Zadrazil, Markus
Metzelder, Martin
Kimberger, Oliver
Marhofer, Peter
author_sort Opfermann, Philipp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidural anesthesia for open infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis surgery is a controversial issue in the presence of little comparative data. AIMS: To compare this approach to general anesthesia for desaturation events (≤90% oxygen saturation) and absolute values of minimal oxygen saturation, minimal heart frequency, operating‐room occupancy time, and durations of surgery in a retrospective study design. METHODS: Data were retrieved for patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis managed by thoracic epidurals under sedation or general anesthesia with rapid sequence induction between 01/2007 and 12/2017. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were analyzed over eight 5‐minutes intervals relative to the start of anesthesia / sedation (four‐time intervals) and before discharge of the patient from the operating room (four‐time intervals). Fisher's exact tests and mixed model two‐way analysis of variance for repeated measures were employed for intergroup comparisons. RESULTS: The epidural and general anesthesia groups included 69 and 32 evaluable infants, respectively. Patients managed under epidural anesthesia had cumulatively higher minimimal mean (SD) oxygen saturation values (98.2 [2.6] % versus 96.6 [5.2] %, p < 0.001) and lower minimal mean (SD) heart rate values (127.9 [15.0] beats per minute versus 140.7 [17.2] beats per minute, p < 0.001) over time. Similarly, the frequency of desaturation events (defined as ≤90% oxygen saturation) was significantly lower for these patients during the period of 5 minutes after induction of sedation or general anesthesia (odds ratio 7.4 [2.1–25.9]; p = 0.001) and during the subsequent period of five minutes (odds ratio 6.2 [1.1–33.9]; p = 0.031). One case of prolonged respiratory weaning was observed in the general anesthesia group. The mean (SD) operating‐room occupancy was 61.9 (16.6) minutes for the epidural anesthesia group versus 73.3 (22.2) minutes for the general anesthesia group (p = 0.005) as a result of shorter emergence from sedation. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, maintaining spontaneous breathing with minimal airway manipulation in patients undergoing open repair of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis under single‐shot epidural anesthesia resulted in fewer desaturation events ≤90% than general anesthesia. In addition, this approach seems to result in shorter turnover times in the operating room.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8048494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80484942021-04-16 Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study Opfermann, Philipp Wiener, Caspar Schmid, Werner Zadrazil, Markus Metzelder, Martin Kimberger, Oliver Marhofer, Peter Paediatr Anaesth Research Reports BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidural anesthesia for open infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis surgery is a controversial issue in the presence of little comparative data. AIMS: To compare this approach to general anesthesia for desaturation events (≤90% oxygen saturation) and absolute values of minimal oxygen saturation, minimal heart frequency, operating‐room occupancy time, and durations of surgery in a retrospective study design. METHODS: Data were retrieved for patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis managed by thoracic epidurals under sedation or general anesthesia with rapid sequence induction between 01/2007 and 12/2017. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were analyzed over eight 5‐minutes intervals relative to the start of anesthesia / sedation (four‐time intervals) and before discharge of the patient from the operating room (four‐time intervals). Fisher's exact tests and mixed model two‐way analysis of variance for repeated measures were employed for intergroup comparisons. RESULTS: The epidural and general anesthesia groups included 69 and 32 evaluable infants, respectively. Patients managed under epidural anesthesia had cumulatively higher minimimal mean (SD) oxygen saturation values (98.2 [2.6] % versus 96.6 [5.2] %, p < 0.001) and lower minimal mean (SD) heart rate values (127.9 [15.0] beats per minute versus 140.7 [17.2] beats per minute, p < 0.001) over time. Similarly, the frequency of desaturation events (defined as ≤90% oxygen saturation) was significantly lower for these patients during the period of 5 minutes after induction of sedation or general anesthesia (odds ratio 7.4 [2.1–25.9]; p = 0.001) and during the subsequent period of five minutes (odds ratio 6.2 [1.1–33.9]; p = 0.031). One case of prolonged respiratory weaning was observed in the general anesthesia group. The mean (SD) operating‐room occupancy was 61.9 (16.6) minutes for the epidural anesthesia group versus 73.3 (22.2) minutes for the general anesthesia group (p = 0.005) as a result of shorter emergence from sedation. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, maintaining spontaneous breathing with minimal airway manipulation in patients undergoing open repair of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis under single‐shot epidural anesthesia resulted in fewer desaturation events ≤90% than general anesthesia. In addition, this approach seems to result in shorter turnover times in the operating room. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-29 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8048494/ /pubmed/33368903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14114 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pediatric Anesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Opfermann, Philipp
Wiener, Caspar
Schmid, Werner
Zadrazil, Markus
Metzelder, Martin
Kimberger, Oliver
Marhofer, Peter
Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study
title Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study
title_full Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study
title_short Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study
title_sort epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: a retrospective observational study
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33368903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14114
work_keys_str_mv AT opfermannphilipp epiduralversusgeneralanesthesiaforopenpyloromyotomyininfantsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT wienercaspar epiduralversusgeneralanesthesiaforopenpyloromyotomyininfantsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schmidwerner epiduralversusgeneralanesthesiaforopenpyloromyotomyininfantsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT zadrazilmarkus epiduralversusgeneralanesthesiaforopenpyloromyotomyininfantsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT metzeldermartin epiduralversusgeneralanesthesiaforopenpyloromyotomyininfantsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kimbergeroliver epiduralversusgeneralanesthesiaforopenpyloromyotomyininfantsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT marhoferpeter epiduralversusgeneralanesthesiaforopenpyloromyotomyininfantsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy