Cargando…

Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system

The establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) is a critical step in ensuring the continued persistence of marine biodiversity. Although the area protected in MPAs is growing, the movement of individuals (or larvae) among MPAs, termed connectivity, has only recently been included as an objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Kelsey E., Cook, Carly N., Beher, Jutta, Treml, Eric A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32623761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13580
_version_ 1783679295738085376
author Roberts, Kelsey E.
Cook, Carly N.
Beher, Jutta
Treml, Eric A.
author_facet Roberts, Kelsey E.
Cook, Carly N.
Beher, Jutta
Treml, Eric A.
author_sort Roberts, Kelsey E.
collection PubMed
description The establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) is a critical step in ensuring the continued persistence of marine biodiversity. Although the area protected in MPAs is growing, the movement of individuals (or larvae) among MPAs, termed connectivity, has only recently been included as an objective of many MPAs. As such, assessing connectivity is often neglected or oversimplified in the planning process. For promoting population persistence, it is important to ensure that protected areas in a system are functionally connected through dispersal or adult movement. We devised a multi‐species model of larval dispersal for the Australian marine environment to evaluate how much local scale connectivity is protected in MPAs and determine whether the extensive system of MPAs truly functions as a network. We focused on non‐migratory species with simplified larval behaviors (i.e., passive larval dispersal) (e.g., no explicit vertical migration) as an illustration. Of all the MPAs analyzed (approximately 2.7 million km(2)), outside the Great Barrier Reef and Ningaloo Reef, <50% of MPAs (46‐80% of total MPA area depending on the species considered) were functionally connected. Our results suggest that Australia's MPA system cannot be referred to as a single network, but rather a collection of numerous smaller networks delineated by natural breaks in the connectivity of reef habitat. Depending on the dispersal capacity of the taxa of interest, there may be between 25 and 47 individual ecological networks distributed across the Australian marine environment. The need to first assess the underlying natural connectivity of a study system prior to implementing new MPAs represents a key research priority for strategically enlarging MPA networks. Our findings highlight the benefits of integrating multi‐species connectivity into conservation planning to identify opportunities to better incorporate connectivity into the design of MPA systems and thus to increase their capacity to support long‐term, sustainable biodiversity outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8048790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80487902021-04-20 Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system Roberts, Kelsey E. Cook, Carly N. Beher, Jutta Treml, Eric A. Conserv Biol Contributed Papers The establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) is a critical step in ensuring the continued persistence of marine biodiversity. Although the area protected in MPAs is growing, the movement of individuals (or larvae) among MPAs, termed connectivity, has only recently been included as an objective of many MPAs. As such, assessing connectivity is often neglected or oversimplified in the planning process. For promoting population persistence, it is important to ensure that protected areas in a system are functionally connected through dispersal or adult movement. We devised a multi‐species model of larval dispersal for the Australian marine environment to evaluate how much local scale connectivity is protected in MPAs and determine whether the extensive system of MPAs truly functions as a network. We focused on non‐migratory species with simplified larval behaviors (i.e., passive larval dispersal) (e.g., no explicit vertical migration) as an illustration. Of all the MPAs analyzed (approximately 2.7 million km(2)), outside the Great Barrier Reef and Ningaloo Reef, <50% of MPAs (46‐80% of total MPA area depending on the species considered) were functionally connected. Our results suggest that Australia's MPA system cannot be referred to as a single network, but rather a collection of numerous smaller networks delineated by natural breaks in the connectivity of reef habitat. Depending on the dispersal capacity of the taxa of interest, there may be between 25 and 47 individual ecological networks distributed across the Australian marine environment. The need to first assess the underlying natural connectivity of a study system prior to implementing new MPAs represents a key research priority for strategically enlarging MPA networks. Our findings highlight the benefits of integrating multi‐species connectivity into conservation planning to identify opportunities to better incorporate connectivity into the design of MPA systems and thus to increase their capacity to support long‐term, sustainable biodiversity outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-05 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8048790/ /pubmed/32623761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13580 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Contributed Papers
Roberts, Kelsey E.
Cook, Carly N.
Beher, Jutta
Treml, Eric A.
Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system
title Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system
title_full Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system
title_fullStr Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system
title_short Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system
title_sort assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system
topic Contributed Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32623761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13580
work_keys_str_mv AT robertskelseye assessingthecurrentstateofecologicalconnectivityinalargemarineprotectedareasystem
AT cookcarlyn assessingthecurrentstateofecologicalconnectivityinalargemarineprotectedareasystem
AT beherjutta assessingthecurrentstateofecologicalconnectivityinalargemarineprotectedareasystem
AT tremlerica assessingthecurrentstateofecologicalconnectivityinalargemarineprotectedareasystem