Cargando…

A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals

There has been a rapid increase in public, political, and scientific interest regarding the impact of organic ultraviolet (UV) filters to coral reefs. Such filters are found in sunscreens and other consumer products and enter the aquatic environment via direct (i.e., recreational activities, effluen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitchelmore, Carys L., Burns, Emily E., Conway, Annaleise, Heyes, Andrew, Davies, Iain A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33528837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.4948
_version_ 1783679304899493888
author Mitchelmore, Carys L.
Burns, Emily E.
Conway, Annaleise
Heyes, Andrew
Davies, Iain A.
author_facet Mitchelmore, Carys L.
Burns, Emily E.
Conway, Annaleise
Heyes, Andrew
Davies, Iain A.
author_sort Mitchelmore, Carys L.
collection PubMed
description There has been a rapid increase in public, political, and scientific interest regarding the impact of organic ultraviolet (UV) filters to coral reefs. Such filters are found in sunscreens and other consumer products and enter the aquatic environment via direct (i.e., recreational activities, effluents) or indirect (i.e., land runoff) pathways. This review summarizes the current state of the science regarding the concentration of organic UV filters in seawater and sediment near coral reef ecosystems and in coral tissues, toxicological data from early and adult life stages of coral species, and preliminary environmental risk characterizations. Up to 14 different organic UV filters in seawater near coral reefs have been reported across 12 studies, with the majority of concentrations in the nanograms per liter range. Nine papers report toxicological findings from no response to a variety of biological effects occurring in the micrograms per liter to milligrams per liter range, in part given the wide variations in experimental design and coral species and/or life stage used. This review presents key findings; scientific data gaps; flaws in assumptions, practice, and inference; and a number of recommendations for future studies to assess the environmental risk of organic UV filters to coral reef ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:967–988. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8048829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80488292021-04-20 A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals Mitchelmore, Carys L. Burns, Emily E. Conway, Annaleise Heyes, Andrew Davies, Iain A. Environ Toxicol Chem Critical Reviews There has been a rapid increase in public, political, and scientific interest regarding the impact of organic ultraviolet (UV) filters to coral reefs. Such filters are found in sunscreens and other consumer products and enter the aquatic environment via direct (i.e., recreational activities, effluents) or indirect (i.e., land runoff) pathways. This review summarizes the current state of the science regarding the concentration of organic UV filters in seawater and sediment near coral reef ecosystems and in coral tissues, toxicological data from early and adult life stages of coral species, and preliminary environmental risk characterizations. Up to 14 different organic UV filters in seawater near coral reefs have been reported across 12 studies, with the majority of concentrations in the nanograms per liter range. Nine papers report toxicological findings from no response to a variety of biological effects occurring in the micrograms per liter to milligrams per liter range, in part given the wide variations in experimental design and coral species and/or life stage used. This review presents key findings; scientific data gaps; flaws in assumptions, practice, and inference; and a number of recommendations for future studies to assess the environmental risk of organic UV filters to coral reef ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:967–988. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-02 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8048829/ /pubmed/33528837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.4948 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Critical Reviews
Mitchelmore, Carys L.
Burns, Emily E.
Conway, Annaleise
Heyes, Andrew
Davies, Iain A.
A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals
title A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals
title_full A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals
title_fullStr A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals
title_short A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals
title_sort critical review of organic ultraviolet filter exposure, hazard, and risk to corals
topic Critical Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33528837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.4948
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchelmorecarysl acriticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT burnsemilye acriticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT conwayannaleise acriticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT heyesandrew acriticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT daviesiaina acriticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT mitchelmorecarysl criticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT burnsemilye criticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT conwayannaleise criticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT heyesandrew criticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals
AT daviesiaina criticalreviewoforganicultravioletfilterexposurehazardandrisktocorals