Cargando…

A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl

Migratory waterfowl, including geese and ducks, are indicated as the primary reservoir of avian influenza viruses (AIv) which can be subsequently spread to commercial poultry. The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) surveillance efforts of waterfowl for AIv have been largely discontinued in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCuen, Madeline M., Pitesky, Maurice E., Buler, Jeffrey J., Acosta, Sarai, Wilcox, Alexander H., Bond, Ronald F., Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13612
_version_ 1783679310252474368
author McCuen, Madeline M.
Pitesky, Maurice E.
Buler, Jeffrey J.
Acosta, Sarai
Wilcox, Alexander H.
Bond, Ronald F.
Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L.
author_facet McCuen, Madeline M.
Pitesky, Maurice E.
Buler, Jeffrey J.
Acosta, Sarai
Wilcox, Alexander H.
Bond, Ronald F.
Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L.
author_sort McCuen, Madeline M.
collection PubMed
description Migratory waterfowl, including geese and ducks, are indicated as the primary reservoir of avian influenza viruses (AIv) which can be subsequently spread to commercial poultry. The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) surveillance efforts of waterfowl for AIv have been largely discontinued in the contiguous United States. Consequently, the use of technologies to identify areas of high waterfowl density and detect the presence of AIv in habitat such as wetlands has become imperative. Here we identified two high waterfowl density areas in California using processed NEXt generation RADar (NEXRAD) and collected water samples to test the efficacy of two tangential flow ultrafiltration methods and two nucleic acid based AIv detection assays. Whole‐segment amplification and long‐read sequencing yielded more positive samples than standard M‐segment qPCR methods (57.6% versus 3.0%, p < .0001). We determined that this difference in positivity was due to mismatches in published primers to our samples and that these mismatches would result in failing to detect in the vast majority of currently sequenced AIv genomes in public databases. The whole segment sequences were subsequently used to provide subtype and potential host information of the AIv environmental reservoir. There was no statistically significant difference in sequencing reads recovered from the Rexeed(TM) filtration compared to the unfiltered surface water. This overall approach combining remote sensing, filtration and sequencing provides a novel and potentially more effective, surveillance approach for AIv.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8048853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80488532021-04-20 A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl McCuen, Madeline M. Pitesky, Maurice E. Buler, Jeffrey J. Acosta, Sarai Wilcox, Alexander H. Bond, Ronald F. Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L. Transbound Emerg Dis Special Issue Articles Migratory waterfowl, including geese and ducks, are indicated as the primary reservoir of avian influenza viruses (AIv) which can be subsequently spread to commercial poultry. The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) surveillance efforts of waterfowl for AIv have been largely discontinued in the contiguous United States. Consequently, the use of technologies to identify areas of high waterfowl density and detect the presence of AIv in habitat such as wetlands has become imperative. Here we identified two high waterfowl density areas in California using processed NEXt generation RADar (NEXRAD) and collected water samples to test the efficacy of two tangential flow ultrafiltration methods and two nucleic acid based AIv detection assays. Whole‐segment amplification and long‐read sequencing yielded more positive samples than standard M‐segment qPCR methods (57.6% versus 3.0%, p < .0001). We determined that this difference in positivity was due to mismatches in published primers to our samples and that these mismatches would result in failing to detect in the vast majority of currently sequenced AIv genomes in public databases. The whole segment sequences were subsequently used to provide subtype and potential host information of the AIv environmental reservoir. There was no statistically significant difference in sequencing reads recovered from the Rexeed(TM) filtration compared to the unfiltered surface water. This overall approach combining remote sensing, filtration and sequencing provides a novel and potentially more effective, surveillance approach for AIv. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-27 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8048853/ /pubmed/32592444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13612 Text en © 2020 Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue Articles
McCuen, Madeline M.
Pitesky, Maurice E.
Buler, Jeffrey J.
Acosta, Sarai
Wilcox, Alexander H.
Bond, Ronald F.
Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L.
A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl
title A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl
title_full A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl
title_fullStr A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl
title_short A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl
title_sort comparison of amplification methods to detect avian influenza viruses in california wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl
topic Special Issue Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13612
work_keys_str_mv AT mccuenmadelinem acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT piteskymauricee acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT bulerjeffreyj acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT acostasarai acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT wilcoxalexanderh acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT bondronaldf acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT diazmunozsamuell acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT mccuenmadelinem comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT piteskymauricee comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT bulerjeffreyj comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT acostasarai comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT wilcoxalexanderh comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT bondronaldf comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl
AT diazmunozsamuell comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl