Cargando…
A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl
Migratory waterfowl, including geese and ducks, are indicated as the primary reservoir of avian influenza viruses (AIv) which can be subsequently spread to commercial poultry. The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) surveillance efforts of waterfowl for AIv have been largely discontinued in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13612 |
_version_ | 1783679310252474368 |
---|---|
author | McCuen, Madeline M. Pitesky, Maurice E. Buler, Jeffrey J. Acosta, Sarai Wilcox, Alexander H. Bond, Ronald F. Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L. |
author_facet | McCuen, Madeline M. Pitesky, Maurice E. Buler, Jeffrey J. Acosta, Sarai Wilcox, Alexander H. Bond, Ronald F. Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L. |
author_sort | McCuen, Madeline M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Migratory waterfowl, including geese and ducks, are indicated as the primary reservoir of avian influenza viruses (AIv) which can be subsequently spread to commercial poultry. The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) surveillance efforts of waterfowl for AIv have been largely discontinued in the contiguous United States. Consequently, the use of technologies to identify areas of high waterfowl density and detect the presence of AIv in habitat such as wetlands has become imperative. Here we identified two high waterfowl density areas in California using processed NEXt generation RADar (NEXRAD) and collected water samples to test the efficacy of two tangential flow ultrafiltration methods and two nucleic acid based AIv detection assays. Whole‐segment amplification and long‐read sequencing yielded more positive samples than standard M‐segment qPCR methods (57.6% versus 3.0%, p < .0001). We determined that this difference in positivity was due to mismatches in published primers to our samples and that these mismatches would result in failing to detect in the vast majority of currently sequenced AIv genomes in public databases. The whole segment sequences were subsequently used to provide subtype and potential host information of the AIv environmental reservoir. There was no statistically significant difference in sequencing reads recovered from the Rexeed(TM) filtration compared to the unfiltered surface water. This overall approach combining remote sensing, filtration and sequencing provides a novel and potentially more effective, surveillance approach for AIv. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8048853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80488532021-04-20 A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl McCuen, Madeline M. Pitesky, Maurice E. Buler, Jeffrey J. Acosta, Sarai Wilcox, Alexander H. Bond, Ronald F. Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L. Transbound Emerg Dis Special Issue Articles Migratory waterfowl, including geese and ducks, are indicated as the primary reservoir of avian influenza viruses (AIv) which can be subsequently spread to commercial poultry. The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) surveillance efforts of waterfowl for AIv have been largely discontinued in the contiguous United States. Consequently, the use of technologies to identify areas of high waterfowl density and detect the presence of AIv in habitat such as wetlands has become imperative. Here we identified two high waterfowl density areas in California using processed NEXt generation RADar (NEXRAD) and collected water samples to test the efficacy of two tangential flow ultrafiltration methods and two nucleic acid based AIv detection assays. Whole‐segment amplification and long‐read sequencing yielded more positive samples than standard M‐segment qPCR methods (57.6% versus 3.0%, p < .0001). We determined that this difference in positivity was due to mismatches in published primers to our samples and that these mismatches would result in failing to detect in the vast majority of currently sequenced AIv genomes in public databases. The whole segment sequences were subsequently used to provide subtype and potential host information of the AIv environmental reservoir. There was no statistically significant difference in sequencing reads recovered from the Rexeed(TM) filtration compared to the unfiltered surface water. This overall approach combining remote sensing, filtration and sequencing provides a novel and potentially more effective, surveillance approach for AIv. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-27 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8048853/ /pubmed/32592444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13612 Text en © 2020 Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue Articles McCuen, Madeline M. Pitesky, Maurice E. Buler, Jeffrey J. Acosta, Sarai Wilcox, Alexander H. Bond, Ronald F. Díaz‐Muñoz, Samuel L. A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl |
title | A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl |
title_full | A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl |
title_fullStr | A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl |
title_short | A comparison of amplification methods to detect Avian Influenza viruses in California wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl |
title_sort | comparison of amplification methods to detect avian influenza viruses in california wetlands targeted via remote sensing of waterfowl |
topic | Special Issue Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccuenmadelinem acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT piteskymauricee acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT bulerjeffreyj acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT acostasarai acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT wilcoxalexanderh acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT bondronaldf acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT diazmunozsamuell acomparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT mccuenmadelinem comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT piteskymauricee comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT bulerjeffreyj comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT acostasarai comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT wilcoxalexanderh comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT bondronaldf comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl AT diazmunozsamuell comparisonofamplificationmethodstodetectavianinfluenzavirusesincaliforniawetlandstargetedviaremotesensingofwaterfowl |