Cargando…

Adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever

AIM: Secondary prophylaxis with 3–4 weekly benzathine penicillin G injections is necessary to prevent disease morbidity and cardiac mortality in patients with acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD). This study aimed to determine secondary prophylaxis adherence rates in the Far...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kevat, Priya M, Gunnarsson, Ronny, Reeves, Benjamin M, Ruben, Alan R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15239
_version_ 1783679327012913152
author Kevat, Priya M
Gunnarsson, Ronny
Reeves, Benjamin M
Ruben, Alan R
author_facet Kevat, Priya M
Gunnarsson, Ronny
Reeves, Benjamin M
Ruben, Alan R
author_sort Kevat, Priya M
collection PubMed
description AIM: Secondary prophylaxis with 3–4 weekly benzathine penicillin G injections is necessary to prevent disease morbidity and cardiac mortality in patients with acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD). This study aimed to determine secondary prophylaxis adherence rates in the Far North Queensland paediatric population and to identify factors contributing to suboptimal adherence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data recorded in the online RHD register for Queensland, Australia, was performed for a 10‐year study period. The proportion of benzathine penicillin G injections delivered within intervals of ≤28 days and ≤35 days was measured. A multi‐level mixed model logistic regression assessed the influence of age, gender, ethnicity, suburb, Accessibility and Remoteness Index of Australia class, number of people per dwelling, Index of Relative Socio‐economic Advantage and Disadvantage, Index of Education and Occupation, year of inclusion on an ARF/RHD register and individual effect. RESULTS: The study included 277 children and analysis of 7374 injections. No children received ≥80% of recommended injections within a 28‐day interval. Four percent received ≥50% of injections within ≤28 days and 46% received ≥50% of injections at an extended interval of ≤35 days. Increasing age was associated with reduced delivery of injections within 35 days. Increasing year of inclusion was associated with improved delivery within 28 days. The random effect of individual patients was significantly associated with adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Improved timely delivery of secondary prophylaxis for ARF and RHD is needed as current adherence is very low. Interventions should focus on factors specific to each individual child or family unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8048926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80489262021-04-20 Adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever Kevat, Priya M Gunnarsson, Ronny Reeves, Benjamin M Ruben, Alan R J Paediatr Child Health Original Articles AIM: Secondary prophylaxis with 3–4 weekly benzathine penicillin G injections is necessary to prevent disease morbidity and cardiac mortality in patients with acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD). This study aimed to determine secondary prophylaxis adherence rates in the Far North Queensland paediatric population and to identify factors contributing to suboptimal adherence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data recorded in the online RHD register for Queensland, Australia, was performed for a 10‐year study period. The proportion of benzathine penicillin G injections delivered within intervals of ≤28 days and ≤35 days was measured. A multi‐level mixed model logistic regression assessed the influence of age, gender, ethnicity, suburb, Accessibility and Remoteness Index of Australia class, number of people per dwelling, Index of Relative Socio‐economic Advantage and Disadvantage, Index of Education and Occupation, year of inclusion on an ARF/RHD register and individual effect. RESULTS: The study included 277 children and analysis of 7374 injections. No children received ≥80% of recommended injections within a 28‐day interval. Four percent received ≥50% of injections within ≤28 days and 46% received ≥50% of injections at an extended interval of ≤35 days. Increasing age was associated with reduced delivery of injections within 35 days. Increasing year of inclusion was associated with improved delivery within 28 days. The random effect of individual patients was significantly associated with adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Improved timely delivery of secondary prophylaxis for ARF and RHD is needed as current adherence is very low. Interventions should focus on factors specific to each individual child or family unit. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. 2020-12-19 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8048926/ /pubmed/33340191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15239 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kevat, Priya M
Gunnarsson, Ronny
Reeves, Benjamin M
Ruben, Alan R
Adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever
title Adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever
title_full Adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever
title_fullStr Adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever
title_full_unstemmed Adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever
title_short Adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever
title_sort adherence rates and risk factors for suboptimal adherence to secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic fever
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15239
work_keys_str_mv AT kevatpriyam adherenceratesandriskfactorsforsuboptimaladherencetosecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticfever
AT gunnarssonronny adherenceratesandriskfactorsforsuboptimaladherencetosecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticfever
AT reevesbenjaminm adherenceratesandriskfactorsforsuboptimaladherencetosecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticfever
AT rubenalanr adherenceratesandriskfactorsforsuboptimaladherencetosecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticfever