Cargando…
A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels
Multiparameter flow cytometry plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of patients with a suspected hematological malignancy. The ClearLLab 10C Panels consist of four reagent panels (B‐Lineage Tube, T‐Lineage Tube, and 2 Myeloid Lineage Tubes), each consisting of 10 color/10...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32667744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21935 |
_version_ | 1783679336522448896 |
---|---|
author | Hedley, Benjamin D. Cheng, Guoyan Keeney, Michael Kern, Wolfgang Padurean, Adrian Luider, Joanne Chin‐Yee, Ian Lowes, Lori E. Rohrbach, Justin Ortega, Robert Smit, Astrid Lo, Ka‐Wai Magari, Robert Tejidor, Liliana |
author_facet | Hedley, Benjamin D. Cheng, Guoyan Keeney, Michael Kern, Wolfgang Padurean, Adrian Luider, Joanne Chin‐Yee, Ian Lowes, Lori E. Rohrbach, Justin Ortega, Robert Smit, Astrid Lo, Ka‐Wai Magari, Robert Tejidor, Liliana |
author_sort | Hedley, Benjamin D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiparameter flow cytometry plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of patients with a suspected hematological malignancy. The ClearLLab 10C Panels consist of four reagent panels (B‐Lineage Tube, T‐Lineage Tube, and 2 Myeloid Lineage Tubes), each consisting of 10 color/10 antibody conjugates utilizing Beckman Coulters proprietary dry format optimized for investigating patients with suspected leukemia or lymphoma. A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the ClearLLab 10C Panels for qualitative assessment of normal versus abnormal phenotype in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node samples with suspected hematological malignancies. ClearLLab 10C was compared to laboratory developed tests (LDTs) and final clinical diagnosis. Four clinical sites were used to enroll patient's spent specimens (n = 453); three laboratories in North America and one in Europe. Of the 453 specimens, 198 had no malignancy and 255 contained an abnormal population. The diagnostic accuracy of the ClearLLab 10C Panels was achieved with sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 95% with respect to patient final clinical diagnosis. The agreement of phenotyping between ClearLLab10C Panels and LDTs was 98%. Any differences noted between ClearLLab 10C and LDT were due to either the presence of populations below the level of detection, the lack of clinical information provided to the evaluators, or marker(s) not present in these panels. Overall, the ClearLLab 10C demonstrated excellent agreement to LDTs and diagnosis. These four reagent panels can be adopted by individual laboratories to assess the presence or absence of malignancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8048967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80489672021-04-20 A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels Hedley, Benjamin D. Cheng, Guoyan Keeney, Michael Kern, Wolfgang Padurean, Adrian Luider, Joanne Chin‐Yee, Ian Lowes, Lori E. Rohrbach, Justin Ortega, Robert Smit, Astrid Lo, Ka‐Wai Magari, Robert Tejidor, Liliana Cytometry B Clin Cytom Original Articles Multiparameter flow cytometry plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of patients with a suspected hematological malignancy. The ClearLLab 10C Panels consist of four reagent panels (B‐Lineage Tube, T‐Lineage Tube, and 2 Myeloid Lineage Tubes), each consisting of 10 color/10 antibody conjugates utilizing Beckman Coulters proprietary dry format optimized for investigating patients with suspected leukemia or lymphoma. A multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the ClearLLab 10C Panels for qualitative assessment of normal versus abnormal phenotype in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node samples with suspected hematological malignancies. ClearLLab 10C was compared to laboratory developed tests (LDTs) and final clinical diagnosis. Four clinical sites were used to enroll patient's spent specimens (n = 453); three laboratories in North America and one in Europe. Of the 453 specimens, 198 had no malignancy and 255 contained an abnormal population. The diagnostic accuracy of the ClearLLab 10C Panels was achieved with sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 95% with respect to patient final clinical diagnosis. The agreement of phenotyping between ClearLLab10C Panels and LDTs was 98%. Any differences noted between ClearLLab 10C and LDT were due to either the presence of populations below the level of detection, the lack of clinical information provided to the evaluators, or marker(s) not present in these panels. Overall, the ClearLLab 10C demonstrated excellent agreement to LDTs and diagnosis. These four reagent panels can be adopted by individual laboratories to assess the presence or absence of malignancy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-07-15 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8048967/ /pubmed/32667744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21935 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Clinical Cytometry Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hedley, Benjamin D. Cheng, Guoyan Keeney, Michael Kern, Wolfgang Padurean, Adrian Luider, Joanne Chin‐Yee, Ian Lowes, Lori E. Rohrbach, Justin Ortega, Robert Smit, Astrid Lo, Ka‐Wai Magari, Robert Tejidor, Liliana A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels |
title | A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels |
title_full | A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels |
title_fullStr | A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels |
title_short | A multicenter study evaluation of the ClearLLab 10C panels |
title_sort | multicenter study evaluation of the clearllab 10c panels |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32667744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21935 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hedleybenjamind amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT chengguoyan amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT keeneymichael amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT kernwolfgang amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT padureanadrian amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT luiderjoanne amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT chinyeeian amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT loweslorie amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT rohrbachjustin amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT ortegarobert amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT smitastrid amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT lokawai amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT magarirobert amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT tejidorliliana amulticenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT hedleybenjamind multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT chengguoyan multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT keeneymichael multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT kernwolfgang multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT padureanadrian multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT luiderjoanne multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT chinyeeian multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT loweslorie multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT rohrbachjustin multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT ortegarobert multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT smitastrid multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT lokawai multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT magarirobert multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels AT tejidorliliana multicenterstudyevaluationoftheclearllab10cpanels |