Cargando…

Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?

The aim of this study was to identify reasons why the authorization of microbial pest control agents is lengthier under regulatory frameworks of the European Union (EU) than in comparable jurisdictions. A main conclusion is that although the EUʼs regulatory processes have strong scientific foundatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundh, Ingvar, Eilenberg, Jørgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.6177
_version_ 1783679338843996160
author Sundh, Ingvar
Eilenberg, Jørgen
author_facet Sundh, Ingvar
Eilenberg, Jørgen
author_sort Sundh, Ingvar
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to identify reasons why the authorization of microbial pest control agents is lengthier under regulatory frameworks of the European Union (EU) than in comparable jurisdictions. A main conclusion is that although the EUʼs regulatory processes have strong scientific foundations, the most appropriate scientific concepts, knowledge and expertise have not been applied in the safety assessment of microorganisms and biological control. Tradition and conceptual legacies from assessments of conventional chemical pesticides have likely contributed to this by steering the evaluations of microorganisms in less appropriate directions. According to our investigation, the current framework for microbial plant protection products complies poorly with the principles that legislation should have legal predictability, proportionality, and that it should be non‐discriminative, for instance in comparison to corresponding regulations in comparable jurisdictions. We also found that existing possibilities to take non‐safety and ethical considerations into account can probably be used more. To rationalize the EUʼs authorization of microbial control products, both the basic legislation and the evaluations of agents and products need stronger rooting in fundamental microbiological science. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8048978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80489782021-04-20 Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions? Sundh, Ingvar Eilenberg, Jørgen Pest Manag Sci Perspectives The aim of this study was to identify reasons why the authorization of microbial pest control agents is lengthier under regulatory frameworks of the European Union (EU) than in comparable jurisdictions. A main conclusion is that although the EUʼs regulatory processes have strong scientific foundations, the most appropriate scientific concepts, knowledge and expertise have not been applied in the safety assessment of microorganisms and biological control. Tradition and conceptual legacies from assessments of conventional chemical pesticides have likely contributed to this by steering the evaluations of microorganisms in less appropriate directions. According to our investigation, the current framework for microbial plant protection products complies poorly with the principles that legislation should have legal predictability, proportionality, and that it should be non‐discriminative, for instance in comparison to corresponding regulations in comparable jurisdictions. We also found that existing possibilities to take non‐safety and ethical considerations into account can probably be used more. To rationalize the EUʼs authorization of microbial control products, both the basic legislation and the evaluations of agents and products need stronger rooting in fundamental microbiological science. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-12-11 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8048978/ /pubmed/33201551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.6177 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Perspectives
Sundh, Ingvar
Eilenberg, Jørgen
Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?
title Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?
title_full Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?
title_fullStr Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?
title_full_unstemmed Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?
title_short Why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the EU than in comparable jurisdictions?
title_sort why has the authorization of microbial biological control agents been slower in the eu than in comparable jurisdictions?
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.6177
work_keys_str_mv AT sundhingvar whyhastheauthorizationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagentsbeenslowerintheeuthanincomparablejurisdictions
AT eilenbergjørgen whyhastheauthorizationofmicrobialbiologicalcontrolagentsbeenslowerintheeuthanincomparablejurisdictions