Cargando…
Is the “end‐of‐study guess” a valid measure of sham blinding during transcranial direct current stimulation?
Studies using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) typically incorporate a fade‐in, short‐stimulation, fade‐out sham (placebo) protocol, which is assumed to be indistinct from a 10–30 min active protocol on the scalp. However, many studies report that participants can dissociate active sti...
Autores principales: | Turner, Christopher, Jackson, Catherine, Learmonth, Gemma |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8048983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33098709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15018 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The time course of ineffective sham‐blinding during low‐intensity (1 mA) transcranial direct current stimulation
por: Greinacher, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the opercular somatosensory region does not influence experimentally induced pain: a triple blind, sham-controlled study
por: Koyama, Soichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The effect of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive performance in fibromyalgia: A randomized, double-blind sham-controlled trial
por: Serrano, Paul Vicuña, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Affect Lower Extremity Muscle Strength Training in Healthy Individuals: A Triple-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study
por: Maeda, Kazuhei, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Transcranial Pulsed-Current Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot, Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Double-Blind Study
por: Barra, Alice, et al.
Publicado: (2022)