Cargando…

Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics

AIM: The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best‐practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research. DESIGN: Discussion Paper. DATA SOURCES: Scoping reviews that exemplify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollock, Danielle, Davies, Ellen L., Peters, Micah D. J., Tricco, Andrea C., Alexander, Lyndsay, McInerney, Patricia, Godfrey, Christina M., Khalil, Hanan, Munn, Zachary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743
_version_ 1783679357790715904
author Pollock, Danielle
Davies, Ellen L.
Peters, Micah D. J.
Tricco, Andrea C.
Alexander, Lyndsay
McInerney, Patricia
Godfrey, Christina M.
Khalil, Hanan
Munn, Zachary
author_facet Pollock, Danielle
Davies, Ellen L.
Peters, Micah D. J.
Tricco, Andrea C.
Alexander, Lyndsay
McInerney, Patricia
Godfrey, Christina M.
Khalil, Hanan
Munn, Zachary
author_sort Pollock, Danielle
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best‐practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research. DESIGN: Discussion Paper. DATA SOURCES: Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA‐ScR). IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND MIDWIFERY: Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency. CONCLUSION: This study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery. IMPACT: With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8049063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80490632021-04-20 Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics Pollock, Danielle Davies, Ellen L. Peters, Micah D. J. Tricco, Andrea C. Alexander, Lyndsay McInerney, Patricia Godfrey, Christina M. Khalil, Hanan Munn, Zachary J Adv Nurs Research Papers AIM: The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best‐practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research. DESIGN: Discussion Paper. DATA SOURCES: Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA‐ScR). IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND MIDWIFERY: Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency. CONCLUSION: This study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery. IMPACT: With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-04 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8049063/ /pubmed/33543511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Pollock, Danielle
Davies, Ellen L.
Peters, Micah D. J.
Tricco, Andrea C.
Alexander, Lyndsay
McInerney, Patricia
Godfrey, Christina M.
Khalil, Hanan
Munn, Zachary
Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
title Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
title_full Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
title_fullStr Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
title_full_unstemmed Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
title_short Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
title_sort undertaking a scoping review: a practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743
work_keys_str_mv AT pollockdanielle undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics
AT daviesellenl undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics
AT petersmicahdj undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics
AT triccoandreac undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics
AT alexanderlyndsay undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics
AT mcinerneypatricia undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics
AT godfreychristinam undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics
AT khalilhanan undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics
AT munnzachary undertakingascopingreviewapracticalguidefornursingandmidwiferystudentscliniciansresearchersandacademics