Cargando…

The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland

BACKGROUND: General practice websites are an increasingly important point of interaction, but their readability is largely unexplored. One in four adults struggle with basic literacy, and there is a socioeconomic gradient. Readable content is a prerequisite to promoting health literacy. AIM: To asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rughani, Guy, Hanlon, Peter, Corcoran, Neave, Mair, Frances S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33824159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0820
_version_ 1783679385165889536
author Rughani, Guy
Hanlon, Peter
Corcoran, Neave
Mair, Frances S
author_facet Rughani, Guy
Hanlon, Peter
Corcoran, Neave
Mair, Frances S
author_sort Rughani, Guy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: General practice websites are an increasingly important point of interaction, but their readability is largely unexplored. One in four adults struggle with basic literacy, and there is a socioeconomic gradient. Readable content is a prerequisite to promoting health literacy. AIM: To assess general practice website readability by analysing text and design factors, and to assess whether practices adapted their website text to the likely literacy levels of their populations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Websites for all general practices across Scotland were analysed from March to December 2019, using a cross-sectional design. METHOD: Text was extracted from five webpages per website and eight text readability factors were measured, including the Flesch Reading Ease and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. The relationship between readability and a practice population’s level of deprivation, measured using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), was assessed. Overall, 10 design factors contributing to readability and accessibility were scored. RESULTS: In total, 86.4% (n = 813/941) of Scottish practices had a website; 22.9% (n = 874/3823) of webpages were written at, or below, the government-recommended reading level for online content (9–14 years old), and the content of the remaining websites, 77.1% (n = 2949/3823), was suitable for a higher reading age. Of all webpages, 80.5% (n = 3077/3823) were above the recommended level for easy-to-understand ‘plain English’. There was no statistically significant association between webpage reading age and SIMD. Only 6.7% (n = 51/764) of websites achieved all design and accessibility recommendations. CONCLUSION: Changes to practice websites could improve readability and promote health literacy, but practices will need financial resources and ongoing technical support if this is to be achieved and maintained. Failure to provide readable and accessible websites may widen health inequalities; the topic will become increasingly important as online service use accelerates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8049218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80492182021-04-22 The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland Rughani, Guy Hanlon, Peter Corcoran, Neave Mair, Frances S Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: General practice websites are an increasingly important point of interaction, but their readability is largely unexplored. One in four adults struggle with basic literacy, and there is a socioeconomic gradient. Readable content is a prerequisite to promoting health literacy. AIM: To assess general practice website readability by analysing text and design factors, and to assess whether practices adapted their website text to the likely literacy levels of their populations. DESIGN AND SETTING: Websites for all general practices across Scotland were analysed from March to December 2019, using a cross-sectional design. METHOD: Text was extracted from five webpages per website and eight text readability factors were measured, including the Flesch Reading Ease and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. The relationship between readability and a practice population’s level of deprivation, measured using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD), was assessed. Overall, 10 design factors contributing to readability and accessibility were scored. RESULTS: In total, 86.4% (n = 813/941) of Scottish practices had a website; 22.9% (n = 874/3823) of webpages were written at, or below, the government-recommended reading level for online content (9–14 years old), and the content of the remaining websites, 77.1% (n = 2949/3823), was suitable for a higher reading age. Of all webpages, 80.5% (n = 3077/3823) were above the recommended level for easy-to-understand ‘plain English’. There was no statistically significant association between webpage reading age and SIMD. Only 6.7% (n = 51/764) of websites achieved all design and accessibility recommendations. CONCLUSION: Changes to practice websites could improve readability and promote health literacy, but practices will need financial resources and ongoing technical support if this is to be achieved and maintained. Failure to provide readable and accessible websites may widen health inequalities; the topic will become increasingly important as online service use accelerates. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8049218/ /pubmed/33824159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0820 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Rughani, Guy
Hanlon, Peter
Corcoran, Neave
Mair, Frances S
The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland
title The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland
title_full The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland
title_fullStr The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland
title_full_unstemmed The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland
title_short The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland
title_sort readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in scotland
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33824159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0820
work_keys_str_mv AT rughaniguy thereadabilityofgeneralpracticewebsitesacrosssectionalanalysisofallgeneralpracticewebsitesinscotland
AT hanlonpeter thereadabilityofgeneralpracticewebsitesacrosssectionalanalysisofallgeneralpracticewebsitesinscotland
AT corcoranneave thereadabilityofgeneralpracticewebsitesacrosssectionalanalysisofallgeneralpracticewebsitesinscotland
AT mairfrancess thereadabilityofgeneralpracticewebsitesacrosssectionalanalysisofallgeneralpracticewebsitesinscotland
AT rughaniguy readabilityofgeneralpracticewebsitesacrosssectionalanalysisofallgeneralpracticewebsitesinscotland
AT hanlonpeter readabilityofgeneralpracticewebsitesacrosssectionalanalysisofallgeneralpracticewebsitesinscotland
AT corcoranneave readabilityofgeneralpracticewebsitesacrosssectionalanalysisofallgeneralpracticewebsitesinscotland
AT mairfrancess readabilityofgeneralpracticewebsitesacrosssectionalanalysisofallgeneralpracticewebsitesinscotland