Cargando…

Level of Evidence on Platelet-rich Plasma in Plastic Surgery

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased popularity of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in plastic surgery, there is no detailed analysis on the level of evidence on PRP use in plastic surgery. As the number of applications of PRP in plastic surgery increases, it is important for plastic surgeons to understand t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Min-Jeong, Rohrich, Rod J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003379
_version_ 1783679416542429184
author Cho, Min-Jeong
Rohrich, Rod J.
author_facet Cho, Min-Jeong
Rohrich, Rod J.
author_sort Cho, Min-Jeong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the increased popularity of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in plastic surgery, there is no detailed analysis on the level of evidence on PRP use in plastic surgery. As the number of applications of PRP in plastic surgery increases, it is important for plastic surgeons to understand the scientific and validated evidence behind its use. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify current level of evidence on platelet-rich plasma in plastic surgery. METHODS: We performed a computerized search of platelet-rich plasma in plastic surgery using the MEDLINE, Cochran Library, and EMBASE databases. Data regarding the type of study, PRP application, and outcomes were collected. Then, the level of evidence was assigned using the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Level of Evidence Rating. RESULTS: Our search identified 105 articles, and about 78.1% of studies were lower-quality studies: 37 level-III articles (35.2%), 32 level-IV articles (30.5%), and 13 level-V articles (12.4%). There were only 6 level-I articles and 17 level-II studies. Level-I studies were on facial rejuvenation using a laser, carpal tunnel release, cleft lip repair, trauma wounds, breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi, and hair regrowth. CONCLUSIONS: Our review of the literature shows that the level of evidence on PRP use in plastic surgery is low (21.9%). Nevertheless, we believe level-III to level-V studies are still valuable, as performing high-level quality studies in plastic surgery is difficult due to variability in surgical techniques, experiences, and materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8049385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80493852021-04-16 Level of Evidence on Platelet-rich Plasma in Plastic Surgery Cho, Min-Jeong Rohrich, Rod J. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic BACKGROUND: Despite the increased popularity of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in plastic surgery, there is no detailed analysis on the level of evidence on PRP use in plastic surgery. As the number of applications of PRP in plastic surgery increases, it is important for plastic surgeons to understand the scientific and validated evidence behind its use. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify current level of evidence on platelet-rich plasma in plastic surgery. METHODS: We performed a computerized search of platelet-rich plasma in plastic surgery using the MEDLINE, Cochran Library, and EMBASE databases. Data regarding the type of study, PRP application, and outcomes were collected. Then, the level of evidence was assigned using the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Level of Evidence Rating. RESULTS: Our search identified 105 articles, and about 78.1% of studies were lower-quality studies: 37 level-III articles (35.2%), 32 level-IV articles (30.5%), and 13 level-V articles (12.4%). There were only 6 level-I articles and 17 level-II studies. Level-I studies were on facial rejuvenation using a laser, carpal tunnel release, cleft lip repair, trauma wounds, breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi, and hair regrowth. CONCLUSIONS: Our review of the literature shows that the level of evidence on PRP use in plastic surgery is low (21.9%). Nevertheless, we believe level-III to level-V studies are still valuable, as performing high-level quality studies in plastic surgery is difficult due to variability in surgical techniques, experiences, and materials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8049385/ /pubmed/33868870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003379 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Cosmetic
Cho, Min-Jeong
Rohrich, Rod J.
Level of Evidence on Platelet-rich Plasma in Plastic Surgery
title Level of Evidence on Platelet-rich Plasma in Plastic Surgery
title_full Level of Evidence on Platelet-rich Plasma in Plastic Surgery
title_fullStr Level of Evidence on Platelet-rich Plasma in Plastic Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Level of Evidence on Platelet-rich Plasma in Plastic Surgery
title_short Level of Evidence on Platelet-rich Plasma in Plastic Surgery
title_sort level of evidence on platelet-rich plasma in plastic surgery
topic Cosmetic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33868870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003379
work_keys_str_mv AT chominjeong levelofevidenceonplateletrichplasmainplasticsurgery
AT rohrichrodj levelofevidenceonplateletrichplasmainplasticsurgery