Cargando…

Antigen tests for COVID-19

PCR diagnosis has been considered as the gold standard for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other many diseases. However, there are many problems in using PCR, such as non-specific (i.e., false-positive) and false-negative amplifications, the limits of a target sample volume, deactivation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kyosei, Yuta, Yamura, Sou, Namba, Mayuri, Yoshimura, Teruki, Watabe, Satoshi, Ito, Etsuro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Biophysical Society of Japan 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954080
http://dx.doi.org/10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v18.004
Descripción
Sumario:PCR diagnosis has been considered as the gold standard for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other many diseases. However, there are many problems in using PCR, such as non-specific (i.e., false-positive) and false-negative amplifications, the limits of a target sample volume, deactivation of the enzymes used, complicated techniques, difficulty in designing probe sequences, and the expense. We, thus, need an alternative to PCR, for example an ultrasensitive antigen test. In the present review, we summarize the following three topics. (1) The problems of PCR are outlined. (2) The antigen tests are surveyed in the literature that was published in 2020, and their pros and cons are discussed for commercially available antigen tests. (3) Our own antigen test on the basis of an ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is introduced. Finally, we discuss the possibility that our antigen test by an ultrasensitive ELISA technique will become the gold standard for diagnosis of COVID-19 and other diseases.