Cargando…

A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess a population of patients with nonunion of the tibia treated with the Ilizarov method in terms of achieved union rates and maintained union rates, determination of re-fracture factors, with a subsequent comparison of our findings with those report...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szelerski, Łukasz, Pajchert Kozłowska, Andżelika, Żarek, Sławomir, Górski, Radosław, Mochocki, Karol, Dejnek, Maciej, Urbański, Wiktor, Reichert, Paweł, Morasiewicz, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32778920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03571-8
_version_ 1783679504202334208
author Szelerski, Łukasz
Pajchert Kozłowska, Andżelika
Żarek, Sławomir
Górski, Radosław
Mochocki, Karol
Dejnek, Maciej
Urbański, Wiktor
Reichert, Paweł
Morasiewicz, Piotr
author_facet Szelerski, Łukasz
Pajchert Kozłowska, Andżelika
Żarek, Sławomir
Górski, Radosław
Mochocki, Karol
Dejnek, Maciej
Urbański, Wiktor
Reichert, Paweł
Morasiewicz, Piotr
author_sort Szelerski, Łukasz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess a population of patients with nonunion of the tibia treated with the Ilizarov method in terms of achieved union rates and maintained union rates, determination of re-fracture factors, with a subsequent comparison of our findings with those reported in the available literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective assessment of 102 patients with nonunion of the tibia treated with the Ilizarov method in the period 2008–2015. The assessed parameters were bone union achieved during treatment, duration of stabilization with an Ilizarov external fixator, and maintained bone union at the last follow-up visit. RESULTS: The mean age at the start of treatment was 46.7 years (11–84 years). The mean follow-up period was 7 years (2–12 years). Bone union was achieved in all patients. The mean duration of Ilizarov stabilization in the study group was 7.9 months (2.8–20.7 months). The rate of union maintained at the last follow-up visit was 95.1%. CONCLUSIONS: All patients in our study achieved bone union, which constitutes a better outcome than those reported on average in the literature (73.7–100%). The mean length of time which the Ilizarov external fixator was in place in our patients was 8.3 months, which is consistent with the data from literature. Infection, atrophic nonunion, nonunion in 1/3 distal of tibia, and close surgery technique are risk factors of re-fracture. None of the analyzed studies assessed the proportion of patients with maintained bone union. In our study, maintained bone union was observed in 95.1% of patients at the follow-up visit at least 2 years after treatment, which indicates excellent long-term treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia treated with the Ilizarov method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8049889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80498892021-04-29 A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia Szelerski, Łukasz Pajchert Kozłowska, Andżelika Żarek, Sławomir Górski, Radosław Mochocki, Karol Dejnek, Maciej Urbański, Wiktor Reichert, Paweł Morasiewicz, Piotr Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Trauma Surgery INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess a population of patients with nonunion of the tibia treated with the Ilizarov method in terms of achieved union rates and maintained union rates, determination of re-fracture factors, with a subsequent comparison of our findings with those reported in the available literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective assessment of 102 patients with nonunion of the tibia treated with the Ilizarov method in the period 2008–2015. The assessed parameters were bone union achieved during treatment, duration of stabilization with an Ilizarov external fixator, and maintained bone union at the last follow-up visit. RESULTS: The mean age at the start of treatment was 46.7 years (11–84 years). The mean follow-up period was 7 years (2–12 years). Bone union was achieved in all patients. The mean duration of Ilizarov stabilization in the study group was 7.9 months (2.8–20.7 months). The rate of union maintained at the last follow-up visit was 95.1%. CONCLUSIONS: All patients in our study achieved bone union, which constitutes a better outcome than those reported on average in the literature (73.7–100%). The mean length of time which the Ilizarov external fixator was in place in our patients was 8.3 months, which is consistent with the data from literature. Infection, atrophic nonunion, nonunion in 1/3 distal of tibia, and close surgery technique are risk factors of re-fracture. None of the analyzed studies assessed the proportion of patients with maintained bone union. In our study, maintained bone union was observed in 95.1% of patients at the follow-up visit at least 2 years after treatment, which indicates excellent long-term treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia treated with the Ilizarov method. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8049889/ /pubmed/32778920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03571-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Trauma Surgery
Szelerski, Łukasz
Pajchert Kozłowska, Andżelika
Żarek, Sławomir
Górski, Radosław
Mochocki, Karol
Dejnek, Maciej
Urbański, Wiktor
Reichert, Paweł
Morasiewicz, Piotr
A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia
title A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia
title_full A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia
title_fullStr A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia
title_full_unstemmed A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia
title_short A new criterion for assessing Ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia
title_sort new criterion for assessing ilizarov treatment outcomes in nonunion of the tibia
topic Trauma Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8049889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32778920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03571-8
work_keys_str_mv AT szelerskiłukasz anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT pajchertkozłowskaandzelika anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT zareksławomir anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT gorskiradosław anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT mochockikarol anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT dejnekmaciej anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT urbanskiwiktor anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT reichertpaweł anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT morasiewiczpiotr anewcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT szelerskiłukasz newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT pajchertkozłowskaandzelika newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT zareksławomir newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT gorskiradosław newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT mochockikarol newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT dejnekmaciej newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT urbanskiwiktor newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT reichertpaweł newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia
AT morasiewiczpiotr newcriterionforassessingilizarovtreatmentoutcomesinnonunionofthetibia